☯️ Cavalli Audio's Liquid Carbon... a $599 Cavalli amp???
May 17, 2015 at 11:31 PM Post #1,546 of 5,932
Looks like I'll be using the LC/HE-1000 combo as well, congrats!
 
May 17, 2015 at 11:38 PM Post #1,547 of 5,932
I have a feeling this thing will be sold out before August. The price point and performance make it a no-brainer for me. Also, the last couple of posts by Dr. Cavalli shed some light as to just how powerful and capable it will be for driving our exotic toys 
smily_headphones1.gif
 I'm excited.
 
May 18, 2015 at 2:18 AM Post #1,548 of 5,932
I have....The Crimson is clearly more powerful. They are both wonderful. One is transportable the other is a killer desktop device. If I could have only one, it would be the Crimson. 

you also ordered a LC Eric?
 
May 18, 2015 at 7:30 AM Post #1,549 of 5,932
 
I have....The Crimson is clearly more powerful. They are both wonderful. One is transportable the other is a killer desktop device. If I could have only one, it would be the Crimson. 

you also ordered a LC Eric?

I have not. There is a limit to how many amps you can use!  I am very impressed with the LC though. Alex has a strong lineup and this provides a very high value option.
 
May 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM Post #1,551 of 5,932
 
I have....The Crimson is clearly more powerful. They are both wonderful. One is transportable the other is a killer desktop device. If I could have only one, it would be the Crimson. 


Have you compared the Carbon vs Crimson or are you just leaning on the specs?

I reviewed the Crimson for Headphone.guru. Check out my sig line. At the time I was reviewing the Crimson there were only two units in existence. I also spent time with both at CanJam in March. I really like the LC. It is an awesome value. However, it is not at the Crimson or Gold's level. This is not a surprise given the cost difference as well as power. 
 
May 18, 2015 at 5:00 PM Post #1,552 of 5,932
I reviewed the Crimson for Headphone.guru. Check out my sig line. At the time I was reviewing the Crimson there were only two units in existence. I also spent time with both at CanJam in March. I really like the LC. It is an awesome value. However, it is not at the Crimson or Gold's level. This is not a surprise given the cost difference as well as power. 


Okey, can you describe the diffrence in sound?
Do the LC lack of base or dynamics or what is your impressions in more detail?

And the leap btw Crimson and Gold are as big as btw Carbon vs Crimson or?
 
May 18, 2015 at 5:18 PM Post #1,553 of 5,932
 
I reviewed the Crimson for Headphone.guru. Check out my sig line. At the time I was reviewing the Crimson there were only two units in existence. I also spent time with both at CanJam in March. I really like the LC. It is an awesome value. However, it is not at the Crimson or Gold's level. This is not a surprise given the cost difference as well as power. 


Okey, can you describe the diffrence in sound?
Do the LC lack of base or dynamics or what is your impressions in more detail?

And the leap btw Crimson and Gold are as big as btw Carbon vs Crimson or?

First, the Carbon is a terrific amp and will put pressure on a lot of $1k+ amps given its quality. It is bested by the Crimson IMO in dynamic's. The Crimson's increased power reserves gives it an ability to manage music with large scale presentation. Orchestral, Metal, music with a lot of power faired better with the extra reserves from the Crimson. I did not find big differences with Folk or intimate Jazz as these tend to require finesse and both amps had that in spades. The LAu takes the power up to another level but would likely be most useful for less efficient headphones. For example, the Abyss 1266 and the HE-6 can both be driven effortlessly from the LAu while taking the Crimson to its limits. The LC would not be a good match for those headphones. If you are not using them, then there will be a lot of sonic similarity between all three. The Crimson and LAu will have higher quality internals that a higher price tag allows for so there are some additional sonic advantages to be squeezed out with higher end cans. I like all three very much. The Crimson is my favorite simply because of its bang for the buck status in my own head. YMMV.
 
beerchug.gif

 
May 18, 2015 at 6:04 PM Post #1,554 of 5,932
Also if using iems I doubt the Crimson or greater powered amp with give you any benefit whatsoever
Even the crimson starts with 4x gain and no unity gain mode so there would be no travel at all for your volume pot with sensitive iems.

I am a sucker for iems and only have big can (HE500) so for my use case the Carbon is better.
 
May 18, 2015 at 6:46 PM Post #1,555 of 5,932
First, the Carbon is a terrific amp and will put pressure on a lot of $1k+ amps given its quality. It is bested by the Crimson IMO in dynamic's. The Crimson's increased power reserves gives it an ability to manage music with large scale presentation. Orchestral, Metal, music with a lot of power faired better with the extra reserves from the Crimson. I did not find big differences with Folk or intimate Jazz as these tend to require finesse and both amps had that in spades. The LAu takes the power up to another level but would likely be most useful for less efficient headphones. For example, the Abyss 1266 and the HE-6 can both be driven effortlessly from the LAu while taking the Crimson to its limits. The LC would not be a good match for those headphones. If you are not using them, then there will be a lot of sonic similarity between all three. The Crimson and LAu will have higher quality internals that a higher price tag allows for so there are some additional sonic advantages to be squeezed out with higher end cans. I like all three very much. The Crimson is my favorite simply because of its bang for the buck status in my own head. YMMV.

:beerchug:


Thanks for your detailed answer!

Unfortunately i have the Abyss AB-1266 and have placed an order on the Carbon, just because of the convenient size and price.

And i know i should order a Gold, but my thaughts go like; it will have like 4,5 times greater power than my current Hugo that have 320mW @47 Ohm, but im struggle with my wallet if i should buy a Rolex Submariner or a Crimson. But eaven if i buy the Crimson it will bottom out with my abyss maybe, so i need the Gold probably;(

Hard task:sweat:
 
May 18, 2015 at 6:57 PM Post #1,556 of 5,932
Thanks for your detailed answer!

Unfortunately i have the Abyss AB-1266 and have placed an order on the Carbon, just because of the convenient size and price.

And i know i should order a Gold, but my thaughts go like; it will have like 4,5 times greater power than my current Hugo that have 320mW @47 Ohm, but im struggle with my wallet if i should buy a Rolex Submariner or a Crimson. But eaven if i buy the Crimson it will bottom out with my abyss maybe, so i need the Gold probably;(

Hard task:sweat:

 
Well if you think of it in terms of actual functionality, the LAu will give you what the LC can't:  enough power to drive your Abyss.  The Rolex is a very overrated watch, functionally speaking.  An Orient Mako will keep time better.   So with one purchase you're getting more than just a status symbol, you're getting added utility.
 
EDIT - BTW, very tongue in cheek post, in case it wasn't clear.  Enjoy your Rolex if that's the way you decide to go.  
biggrin.gif

 
May 18, 2015 at 8:25 PM Post #1,557 of 5,932
Oh I don't know.  I wear my Orient Mako just about everyday and for sure it is a nice watch.
Notwithstanding, the Rolex Submariner is just a very fine thing, indeed.  
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top