[Not-So-Poor Man Reviews] Final Audio Design's Lab I (1500 Dollar Legacy)
Nov 2, 2014 at 4:23 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 151

thatonenoob

Reviewer: PMR Audio
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Posts
2,404
Likes
2,028
FINAL AUDIO DESIGN'S LAB I


<<Nocs NS-800                                 
Quick Navigation Panel
          Etymotic Research ER-4PT >>
 
DISCLAIMERThis will be the longest review I have ever written, but I feel that the Lab I is a pair of earphones that deserves an extremely comprehensive writeup.  I hope you will enjoy reading this review as much as I enjoyed writing it.  As always, I am neither an employee, nor an affiliate of FAD and all photos (except for the forest one) are owned by me.  Without further ado, let's get started.
 
INTRODUCTION

“Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village, though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.”
 
―Robert Frost, Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening (excerpt)
 
There is simply so much going on in today’s audio world.  New and exciting products are released on a regular basis, wowing users with great panache and in many cases, quickly subsiding back into anonymity.  Don’t get me wrong –FOTM is one of the reasons why pursuing high-end audio is so exciting!  However, every once in a while, something comes along that seems like it just might exhibit a stroke of lasting genius
 
Enter the Final Audio Design Lab I: a limited run earphone (150 production models total) that was priced at the astronomically high MSRP of 1500 USD.  In many ways, the Lab I is a very direct reflection of the unique (if not maverick) Final Audio Design philosophy.  Founded in 1974, the company has been producing audio equipment that “exceeds common sense” for over 35 years.  In 2009, after two years of collaboration with Molex, it entered the in-ear market with a lineup of truly novel products. 
 
The Lab I seems to defy expectations in every sense.  At 1500 dollars, it makes no intention to emulate any of its competitors, which include numerous highly capable, well-known CIEMs.  In addition, the limited run means that getting your hands on one now might be harder than finding the Fountain of Youth.  Before I go any further, a big thank you to Yoko @ Final Audio Design for sending a review unit.  I’m truly honored to have been given this opportunity to review the Lab I.   
 
SPECIFICATIONS

TYPE: Dual Balanced Armature Full Range Driver with BAM
SENSITIVITY: 1I2 dB
IMPEDANCE: 8 ohms
WEIGHT: 26 grams
PRICE: 1500-2000 USD (depends on seller)

 
PACKAGING/ INCLUDED ITEMS


 
The Lab I comes in a monolithic faux snakeskin box.  There’s a certain gravitas to the whole package that immediately captures one’s attention.  The top right corner features Final Audio Design’s logo, and on the back is a quick summary of the Lab I (not that a buyer of a Lab I should be needing one).  Opening the box reveals a luxurious faux fur material on which the Lab I rests.  Simply stately. 
 
 
 
Removing the fur platform uncovers the extra eartips and an unassembled leather pouch.  The unassembled leather pouch is truly the epitome of eccentricity.  It’s a raw statement that characterizes Final Audio Design’s bold philosophy.  Whereas most earphones in this price range seek to deliver a full package in which the user simply has to remove the earphones, plug-in, and enter audio heaven, the Lab I’s package tells the user to “go figure”.  It took me well over half an hour to assemble the leather pouch (I am a little OCD about these things), during which time I didn’t even touch the earphones.  After tying a simple overhand knot to finish the process, I felt like I had in some way been involved in the process of making the earphones.  The fruit of my labor was a high-quality leather pouch that I probably wouldn’t be using.  In fact, I did a bit more tinkering before finally settling on a Pelican case with foam inserts (which I now transport the Lab I in).
 
 
 
While practicality (and the limited number of eartips) may not be one of the strengths of the Lab I’s packaging, the experience as a whole is distinctive and tactile.  From the textured snakeskin to the soft fur to the leather pouch, handling the package itself was incredibly rewarding, and it’s an unboxing experience like none other.  
 
 ​
 
BUILD/ DESIGN QUALITY

 
Let’s start with some technical details.  The Lab I features a 3D printed Titanium 64 housing, which is also classified as Grade 5 titanium.  This particular alloy is known for its strength and corrosion resistance, both of which are very desirable traits for an earphone.  According to Final Audio Design, the 3D printing process actually required a significant amount of human resources, which came in the form of “digital craftsmanship”. 
 
The actual printing process required irradiating metal powder over an extremely small area with a laser, and then proceeding to melt and harden it.  This leaves the surface extremely rough and pocked with marks.  However, Final Audio Design worked closely with a coordinator with knowledge in specially processed metals to create the finely polished surface seen in the final product.
 
The checkered design on the Lab I is meant to show off the fruit of this labor-intensive process.  The main squares feature a beautiful mirror like finish while the sunken ones feature the grainy texture of the unfinished product.  It’s really a testament to how much engineering went into the build of the earphones alone.  
 
The Lab I’s fit is rather interesting.  The earphone does not have an ergonomic fit that is present on many other earphones in this price range.  However, they worked with my ears, and I didn’t even have to change the eartips (which, while limited in selection, are very good quality).  Isolation is relatively good, and will block most environmental sounds (not that you should even be bringing these outside).
 
The cable is flat and high quality, but unfortunately is not detachable (really wish it was though).  Microphonics is surprisingly limited, and there is very little memory maintained in general. The 3.5 mm jack plug is well built (and looks just as good as the earphones), but I wish it was titled at 90 degrees instead.  The split is similarly durable.
 
 
 ​
Naturally, the design portion of this review is arguably one of the more subjective points I will raise.  Personally, I really liked the overall look of the Lab I, but the luxurious, “jewelry” styling of the housing might not be a hit with everyone. One has to keep in mind that the Final Audio Design Lab I was not supposed to achieve mass appeal though.  It is a statement piece, a earphone that is meant to show off what can be done when a company pours all its resources into producing a top of the line flagship model.
 
SOUND QUALITY

 
Second photo is by the Pennsylvania Bureau of State Parks.
 
Once again, I’ll begin this section with a few technical specifications.  The Final Audio Design Lab I makes use of full range dual balanced armature drivers (i.e., wired in parallel with no crossovers) and balanced air movement technology to achieve “overwhelming realism” through “weighty bass tones”. 
 
The bass performance of the Lab I is stunning.  One of its greatest strengths is the natural depth of its sound.  The bass feels like it is being drawn out from a fathomless source, and when released, creates an incredibly profound sound that is truly enveloping.  A bit abstract?  I’ll try explaining this in slightly more objective terms.  The quantity of the bass is significant (even weighty), but not in the least bit bloated.  However, the defining characteristic of the bass is not to be found in its quantity, but a certain aspect of its quality.  The Lab I’s bass has its strength not in fast attack, but in extremely well controlled decay.  The titanium housing and the specially engineered form of the earphones do an amazing job of creating an impactful sound while instantly being able to stop decay/reverberations when necessary. In Odesza’s Kusanagi, the low frequency notes are powerfully rendered, but are very well controlled, making room for the triangles and vocals.  The result of all this is a magnificently compelling sound that is also surprisingly composed.
 
The mids are good, but sometimes unpredictable.  Occasionally, it might appear to even be a little laid back, giving the misconception that the mids are slightly veiled.  However, when paired with songs that feature strong leading vocals, the Lab I suddenly springs to life, and renders the mids with marvelous enthusiasm and energy.    
 
The treble is clear and precise, being well integrated into the overall SQ of the Lab I.  It retains enough texture and detail to satisfy a discerning listener, without creating the generally exhausting sound that is associated with many brighter earphones.  The treble also helps to open up the soundstage of the Lab I.  While it isn’t huge by any means, the airiness and excellent instrument separation prevent it from being overly enclosed or claustrophobic.  
 
After many, many hours of close listening, I came to realize that the Lab I’s SQ is actually filled with a huge amount of detail that might be initially missed due to its equally impressive macrodynamic performance.  While re-listening to all my bossa nova albums, I became increasingly aware (and impressed) by the microdynamics going on behind the main sound.  Triangles and other percussive instruments were very well reproduced, and the Lab I’s never seemed to miss a beat.
 
It is safe to say that the Lab I has a truly unique SQ.  Its ability to effortlessly reproduce music stands in stark contrast to some earphones that sound almost contrived due to their emphasis on producing a "certain" sound.   It is the product of endless refinement and reflects an intelligent taste.  In short, the Lab I is one of the most elegant earphones that I have ever used. 
 
FINAL THOUGHTS

 
I quoted Frost at the start of the review because I believed that Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening captured the nature of the Lab I perfectly.  In the poem, an unknown narrator stops by the woods on a dark night to marvel at the beauty of snowfall (think of an idyllic New England countryside during winter).   Although it might initially be difficult to make things out in the darkness, sustained observation reveals beautiful details that might otherwise be missed during a casual once over.  Observe long enough, and perhaps you might find yourself lost in the wondrously magical woods that is the Lab I.  
 
Thank you for reading, and good listening!
 
Best Regards,
Thatonenoob
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 6:49 AM Post #3 of 151
Great review! An admirable work that describes the qualities of bass, mids and trebles well.
 
$1500 is a good price for the Lab 1 though. Most paid $1600 or more.
 
And to clarify, that that red Pelican case did not come with your Lab 1, right? Good choice though. I am using an Otterbox 100 plus an inner pouch for the earpieces.
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 7:01 AM Post #4 of 151
  Great review! An admirable work that describes the qualities of bass, mids and trebles well.
 
$1500 is a good price for the Lab 1 though. Most paid $1600 or more.
 
And to clarify, that that red Pelican case did not come with your Lab 1, right? Good choice though. I am using an Otterbox 100 plus an inner pouch for the earpieces.

Thank you! This was honestly one of the more difficult earphones to review as it really seems to have a life of its own.  Maybe I'm going crazy...but at least I'm doing so in the midst of great audio!
 
Yep, the case did not come with the Lab 1.  I felt that it really need that level of protection lol.  My only gripe is that the case is a little unwieldy.  The otterbox seems like a much sleeker solution! 
tongue.gif

 
Nov 2, 2014 at 7:13 AM Post #5 of 151
Yes the Otterbox is a fair bit smaller (here with the Calxy M which it accompanies). However the Otterbox has no padding. I have this old spring-lipped pouch from some early earbuds which is been hanging around for ages and now has found good use. I insert the Lab 1 eartips in the pouch. It is not padded but it prevents the tips from rattling around. The result is very secure.
 

 
And I do use the included leather pouch for storage at home...
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 8:10 AM Post #6 of 151
  Yes the Otterbox is a fair bit smaller (here with the Calxy M which it accompanies). However the Otterbox has no padding. I have this old spring-lipped pouch from some early earbuds which is been hanging around for ages and now has found good use. I insert the Lab 1 eartips in the pouch. It is not padded but it prevents the tips from rattling around. The result is very secure.
 

 
And I do use the included leather pouch for storage at home...

Wow very nice setup! 
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 10:23 AM Post #8 of 151
From SQ standpoint, is Lab 1 better than DN2000?

It's really hard to compare...considering that the Lab 1 is 5-6 times the price of the DN-2000.  The Lab 1's bass is much more natural and effortless, but the overall SQ is far less "mainstream".  I'm not too sure of your needs (don't want to make assumptions), but the DN-2000 is a great mid-range contender in the world of high-end audio.   The Lab 1 is like an avant garde piece of art that really takes a little while to get used to.  However, if resources permit, and an opportunity arises, I would gladly snap up a Lab 1.  
etysmile.gif

 
 
Nice review; the prose quite befitting as I find, despite the engineering feat, there's more art than science in the Lab 1. It's a special one.

Agree 100%. I think a lot of the engineering went into the aesthetics (not discrediting the BAM tech though), which makes for a truly distinctive pair of earphones.
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 10:57 AM Post #9 of 151
Very nice review! And about time too, I reckon most Lab1 owners are too busy enjoying to post a dedicated in-depth review the Lab1 so richly deserves :) it truly is a magical experience to engulf oneself with music as presented by the Lab1. I especially agree on the single description that it is 'elegant', there is this effortless grace, poise and finesse that the Lab1 exudes. It simply does not 'try', emulate or announces, but draws, lulls and teases you out of your own world into its own. Cliched but the Lab1 succinctly represents the 'Final' Audio design with such conviction, as it very well may be with it's lasting genius.
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM Post #10 of 151
Very nice review! And about time too, I reckon most Lab1 owners are too busy enjoying to post a dedicated in-depth review the Lab1 so richly deserves
smily_headphones1.gif
it truly is a magical experience to engulf oneself with music as presented by the Lab1. I especially agree on the single description that it is 'elegant', there is this effortless grace, poise and finesse that the Lab1 exudes. It simply does not 'try', emulate or announces, but draws, lulls and teases you out of your own world into its own. Cliched but the Lab1 succinctly represents the 'Final' Audio design with such conviction, as it very well may be with it's lasting genius.

Agreed! when doing background research, I was a bit surprised to find that there wasn't actually all that much info on these out there,  Then again, only 150 were ever made, so that might explain why.  It is definitely a magical experience, and one that can truly change the way a listener perceives hi-fi.  The effortlessness is simply great....really haven't heard anything quite like this.  
etysmile.gif
 
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 1:03 PM Post #11 of 151
Ha, I guess I'm the only one who keeps the LAB in a regular case. SoundFreaq built some kind of bomb safe for his which he attached to the foundation of his home lol. I'm glad you mentioned the LAB's very strong sense of dynamics; it's its sheer headroom which surprised me. As you've mentioned, it's very unpredictable in nature. I actually wasn't taken by the LAB I on the first day or two. I was coming from the UERM and while the LAB felt competent, it didn't exactly grasp me from the start.

As you mentioned, the LAB's effortless portrayal of music leaves other phones feeling contrived or artificial sounding by comparison. It's the sort of thing that sneaks up on you as I kind of had to unwire how my brain perceived and evaluated sound to appreciate it (since I was coming from more treble intensive phones at the time. You know the brand of mischief, in which jacked up treble equates to faux detail at the expense of fatigue). I think it was Muppetface who said something along the lines of, "the LAB is for those who love music more than they love gear". I thought that was a pretty brilliant way to sum up this phone.

I think the only thing I would disagree on is with the assertion that the amount of bass on the LAB is significant. I think it carries the potential to deliver so called "weighty" bass (that is bass with a palpable sense of heft behind it), but most of the time, I find the bass to be about a notch above that of the UERM's bass. Again, it's unpredictable in that sense.

You ought to try to get a FIBASS or PF IX in your ears at some point, especially the latter; very esoteric phone, completely unlike anything else and capable of some truly wondrous moments
 
Nov 2, 2014 at 6:10 PM Post #12 of 151
Ha, I guess I'm the only one who keeps the LAB in a regular case. SoundFreaq built some kind of bomb safe for his which he attached to the foundation of his home lol. I'm glad you mentioned the LAB's very strong sense of dynamics; it's its sheer headroom which surprised me. As you've mentioned, it's very unpredictable in nature. I actually wasn't taken by the LAB I on the first day or two. I was coming from the UERM and while the LAB felt competent, it didn't exactly grasp me from the start.

As you mentioned, the LAB's effortless portrayal of music leaves other phones feeling contrived or artificial sounding by comparison. It's the sort of thing that sneaks up on you as I kind of had to unwire how my brain perceived and evaluated sound to appreciate it (since I was coming from more treble intensive phones at the time. You know the brand of mischief, in which jacked up treble equates to faux detail at the expense of fatigue). I think it was Muppetface who said something along the lines of, "the LAB is for those who love music more than they love gear". I thought that was a pretty brilliant way to sum up this phone.

I think the only thing I would disagree on is with the assertion that the amount of bass on the LAB is significant. I think it carries the potential to deliver so called "weighty" bass (that is bass with a palpable sense of heft behind it), but most of the time, I find the bass to be about a notch above that of the UERM's bass. Again, it's unpredictable in that sense.

You ought to try to get a FIBASS or PF IX in your ears at some point, especially the latter; very esoteric phone, completely unlike anything else and capable of some truly wondrous moments

Really do hope to getting around to the FI Bass or PF IX at some point!  I agree that the Lab 1 is truly a musical piece of equipment, and not one driven by pure tech. 
biggrin.gif

 
Nov 2, 2014 at 7:33 PM Post #13 of 151
Whoa. This is just...
 Before I go any further, a big thank you to Yoko @ Final Audio Design for sending a review unit. 

^ This. The review is great, sure, but this...this just takes the cake. Just reading this one line nullifies any praise for the review. This is just up front and center right now.
I'm pretty sure everyone here didn't seem to notice this detail, so I'll take charge and ask: How the f'k did you pull this off?!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top