The JVC FX850..Woodie perfection?. (A review)
Jul 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM Post #1,651 of 3,535
Never tried Wagnus before... sounds like a fantastic cable 
normal_smile%20.gif


My balance amp is not those 4 figures, only the affordable Yulong A28, which I couldn't recommend for those who is going to use the unbalanced headphone output, because the unbalanced headphone output is not even as good as the headphone output of my Yulong DA8. But the balanced output is pretty good, worth the money.

And I didn't have 'expensive' cable for balanced MMCX, only cheap Shure 1440 cable that I cut and terminate with 4 pin XLR.

But that setup was good enough to make FX850 wowed me
normal_smile%20.gif
 


Lovely! Lets hope my 13s comes back asap too so I can hang out on whatever balanced setup demo that Jaben Singapore could offer.

Sourcing cables and amps/dacs for both 13s and woodies, that just sounds plainly looking for trouble on a poor man's wallet. Damn the head-fi :frowning:
 
Jul 20, 2014 at 1:47 PM Post #1,652 of 3,535
Quick comparison of HA-FX850 with ASG-2, now that my otitis has gone:
 
Set-up:
- ASG-2 with stock cable, about 1 year of HEAVY use, and MEELEC clear monoflange tips, XL size to fit my huge ear canals.
- HA-FX850 with stock cable, about 140 hours of burn-in (thanks to my otitis, they had plenty of time for burn-in). Same tips, to minimize variations (see pictures below to appreciate the shape/size of these MUSHROOMS).
- A&K AK120 player with EQ deactivated, which has always been a great match with the ASG-2.
- Music: a nice mix of rock, progressive rock, progressive metal with male/female voices (Stream of Passion, The Reasoning, Marillion, and a bit of Supertramp and Pink Floyd to focus on details)
 


 
Results:
 
- Overall clarity: very good for both IEMs, I would say top of the range for dynamic drivers. I thought I could hear a bit more treble details on some songs for the HA-FX850, but it may be my ears still being a bit sensitive to treble after my otitis.
 
- Instrument separation: again, very resolving IEMs, I couldn't really tell a difference when trying to isolate an instrument.
 
- Soundstage: there is where there is FINALLY a difference between ASG-2 and HA-FX850. To make it simple, the ASG-2 makes you feel like you're in a nice music bar with a band (which is usually my preference over the huge soundstage of IE-800 for example). The HA-FX850 takes you one step closer, like you're in the same room as the band, with the singer 2 meters from you). Basically, the HA-FX850 have an intimate soundstage similar to Shure SE535SE (the Red ones), although their signatures are largely different of course.
 
- Balance: well, even with the bass port close, ASG-2 were always quite heavy on the bass, although overall they would still seem pretty flat for my taste, with good mids and nice treble without sibilance. ASG-2 were my first IEMS where I did not use the equalizer at all. HA-FX850 continue with this trend, with a warm signature but not V-shaped like HA-FX700 were, with mids forward enough to make the overall balance natural.
 
- Bass: plenty for both IEMs but they still feel different. Bass on the ASG-2 is a beast barely contained (high ipact, but not much bleed into the mids) thanks to the huge driver (and don't you dare opening that bass port!). Bass with the HA-FX850 is equally impressive but with a faster decay making it more controlled. Nice progress over the HA-FX700.
 
- Medium: warm and nicely present on both IEMs. Voices feel a bit closer on HA-FX850 although the clarity is remarkable for both IEMs. JVC has gone a long way from HA-FX700 where clarity was already awesome but where the lower part of the midrange was largely hidden behind the bleeding bass.
 
- Treble: mellow and relaxed on the ASG-2 (no sibilence, unlike the shrieking ASG-1), so easy to listen. Treble on the HA-FX850 has faster decay, like the bass, making it sound more lively, but it's far from being harsh or dry.
 
- Confort: ASG-2 fit my ears like a hand in a glove, I tend to forget them fast. HA-FX850 are heavier, they stick out of the ear a bit more and I had to fiddle to get a proper seal, not to deep, not too shallow. Once it's in place though, they're confortable. But I wouldn't imagine doing sport with the JVCs, while it's an awesome experience to do sport with ASG-2.
 
- Build quality: good for ASG-2, although I have to send them back after one year because the left connection starts to cause problems, the Epic cable is excellent. HA-FX850 look like a luxury item, the finish is impeccable although they're made in China, unlike their predecessor the HA-FX700 (made in Japan). The cable is very good , with sturdy connectors and not much memory. Too bad it's difficult to use replacement cables for Shures on the HA-FX850, since they often come with over-the-ear guidewires. The HA-FX850 are not easily worn over the ear.
 
- Noise isolation: average for both IEMs, partially due to the monoflange I used. it would get better with dual or triple flange tips, but these are too small for my ear canals even in L size. Also, I tend not to like longer tips because they make IEMs sound less natural.
 
Conclusion: for people who like warm signature with rich bass and forward vocals, JVC has done an awesome job with the HA-FX850. For half the price of ASG-2, you get IEMS with a signature which is pretty close, with a bit more tightness in the bass and treble, and a more intimate soundstage. They feel a bit heavy for sports (due to their high quality build and long shape).
 
 
Warning: fans of multi-BA IEMs with uber clarity and analytical sound should stay away from these, same thing for people who appreciate cathedral-like soundstages (IE-800...).
 
Jul 20, 2014 at 1:57 PM Post #1,653 of 3,535
tienbasse thanks for your great review!

Would be awesome to see more review and opinions coming in for these great woodies!
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 12:36 AM Post #1,654 of 3,535
Great comparison and thoughts tienbasse. I'm also looking forward to more impression with an amp in the chain as there's a few who mentioned the scalability of the 850. It would be greatly appreciated.
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM Post #1,655 of 3,535
  Quick comparison of HA-FX850 with ASG-2, now that my otitis has gone:
 
Set-up:
- ASG-2 with stock cable, about 1 year of HEAVY use, and MEELEC clear monoflange tips, XL size to fit my huge ear canals.
- HA-FX850 with stock cable, about 140 hours of burn-in (thanks to my otitis, they had plenty of time for burn-in). Same tips, to minimize variations (see pictures below to appreciate the shape/size of these MUSHROOMS).
- A&K AK120 player with EQ deactivated, which has always been a great match with the ASG-2.
- Music: a nice mix of rock, progressive rock, progressive metal with male/female voices (Stream of Passion, The Reasoning, Marillion, and a bit of Supertramp and Pink Floyd to focus on details)
 


 
Results:
 
- Overall clarity: very good for both IEMs, I would say top of the range for dynamic drivers. I thought I could hear a bit more treble details on some songs for the HA-FX850, but it may be my ears still being a bit sensitive to treble after my otitis.
 
- Instrument separation: again, very resolving IEMs, I couldn't really tell a difference when trying to isolate an instrument.
 
- Soundstage: there is where there is FINALLY a difference between ASG-2 and HA-FX850. To make it simple, the ASG-2 makes you feel like you're in a nice music bar with a band (which is usually my preference over the huge soundstage of IE-800 for example). The HA-FX850 takes you one step closer, like you're in the same room as the band, with the singer 2 meters from you). Basically, the HA-FX850 have an intimate soundstage similar to Shure SE535SE (the Red ones), although their signatures are largely different of course.
 
- Balance: well, even with the bass port close, ASG-2 were always quite heavy on the bass, although overall they would still seem pretty flat for my taste, with good mids and nice treble without sibilance. ASG-2 were my first IEMS where I did not use the equalizer at all. HA-FX850 continue with this trend, with a warm signature but not V-shaped like HA-FX700 were, with mids forward enough to make the overall balance natural.
 
- Bass: plenty for both IEMs but they still feel different. Bass on the ASG-2 is a beast barely contained (high ipact, but not much bleed into the mids) thanks to the huge driver (and don't you dare opening that bass port!). Bass with the HA-FX850 is equally impressive but with a faster decay making it more controlled. Nice progress over the HA-FX700.
 
- Medium: warm and nicely present on both IEMs. Voices feel a bit closer on HA-FX850 although the clarity is remarkable for both IEMs. JVC has gone a long way from HA-FX700 where clarity was already awesome but where the lower part of the midrange was largely hidden behind the bleeding bass.
 
- Treble: mellow and relaxed on the ASG-2 (no sibilence, unlike the shrieking ASG-1), so easy to listen. Treble on the HA-FX850 has faster decay, like the bass, making it sound more lively, but it's far from being harsh or dry.
 
- Confort: ASG-2 fit my ears like a hand in a glove, I tend to forget them fast. HA-FX850 are heavier, they stick out of the ear a bit more and I had to fiddle to get a proper seal, not to deep, not too shallow. Once it's in place though, they're confortable. But I wouldn't imagine doing sport with the JVCs, while it's an awesome experience to do sport with ASG-2.
 
- Build quality: good for ASG-2, although I have to send them back after one year because the left connection starts to cause problems, the Epic cable is excellent. HA-FX850 look like a luxury item, the finish is impeccable although they're made in China, unlike their predecessor the HA-FX700 (made in Japan). The cable is very good , with sturdy connectors and not much memory. Too bad it's difficult to use replacement cables for Shures on the HA-FX850, since they often come with over-the-ear guidewires. The HA-FX850 are not easily worn over the ear.
 
- Noise isolation: average for both IEMs, partially due to the monoflange I used. it would get better with dual or triple flange tips, but these are too small for my ear canals even in L size. Also, I tend not to like longer tips because they make IEMs sound less natural.
 
Conclusion: for people who like warm signature with rich bass and forward vocals, JVC has done an awesome job with the HA-FX850. For half the price of ASG-2, you get IEMS with a signature which is pretty close, with a bit more tightness in the bass and treble, and a more intimate soundstage. They feel a bit heavy for sports (due to their high quality build and long shape).
 
 
Warning: fans of multi-BA IEMs with uber clarity and analytical sound should stay away from these, same thing for people who appreciate cathedral-like soundstages (IE-800...).

i used them(850) over the ears as like you dais they are quite heavy and tends to loosen the seal when worn straight down. Initially was quite difficult as the wire tends to fall to the front when worn over ear. now the cable has kinda like form into shape and curls quite nicely behind the ears. i have very good fit with them.... meanwhile still waiting for the silver cable....5 weeks already.
 
agree that they are to the warm side. That day i saw my tf10 lying on the shelf and thought just do a quick impression vs fx850. was surprised that the 850 seem so dark compared to the tf10....
 
anyone tried the 850 w RSA sr-71A/B? an thinking of getting one to go w the 850. reading pass threads on RSA seems to suggest mustang as a better pairing for iems. using tomahawk now.
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 2:23 AM Post #1,656 of 3,535
  Quick comparison of HA-FX850 with ASG-2, now that my otitis has gone:
 
Set-up:
- ASG-2 with stock cable, about 1 year of HEAVY use, and MEELEC clear monoflange tips, XL size to fit my huge ear canals.
- HA-FX850 with stock cable, about 140 hours of burn-in (thanks to my otitis, they had plenty of time for burn-in). Same tips, to minimize variations (see pictures below to appreciate the shape/size of these MUSHROOMS).
- A&K AK120 player with EQ deactivated, which has always been a great match with the ASG-2.
- Music: a nice mix of rock, progressive rock, progressive metal with male/female voices (Stream of Passion, The Reasoning, Marillion, and a bit of Supertramp and Pink Floyd to focus on details)
 


 
 
Conclusion: for people who like warm signature with rich bass and forward vocals, JVC has done an awesome job with the HA-FX850. For half the price of ASG-2, you get IEMS with a signature which is pretty close, with a bit more tightness in the bass and treble, and a more intimate soundstage. They feel a bit heavy for sports (due to their high quality build and long shape).
 
 
Warning: fans of multi-BA IEMs with uber clarity and analytical sound should stay away from these, same thing for people who appreciate cathedral-like soundstages (IE-800...).

 
Very nice comparison!
Allow me to put the link to this comparison in my review :)
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 2:34 AM Post #1,657 of 3,535
Quick comparison of HA-FX850 with ASG-2, now that my otitis has gone:

Set-up:
- ASG-2 with stock cable, about 1 year of HEAVY use, and MEELEC clear monoflange tips, XL size to fit my huge ear canals.
- HA-FX850 with stock cable, about 140 hours of burn-in (thanks to my otitis, they had plenty of time for burn-in). Same tips, to minimize variations (see pictures below to appreciate the shape/size of these MUSHROOMS).
- A&K AK120 player with EQ deactivated, which has always been a great match with the ASG-2.
- Music: a nice mix of rock, progressive rock, progressive metal with male/female voices (Stream of Passion, The Reasoning, Marillion, and a bit of Supertramp and Pink Floyd to focus on details)






Results:

- Overall clarity: very good for both IEMs, I would say top of the range for dynamic drivers. I thought I could hear a bit more treble details on some songs for the HA-FX850, but it may be my ears still being a bit sensitive to treble after my otitis.

- Instrument separation: again, very resolving IEMs, I couldn't really tell a difference when trying to isolate an instrument.

- Soundstage: there is where there is FINALLY a difference between ASG-2 and HA-FX850. To make it simple, the ASG-2 makes you feel like you're in a nice music bar with a band (which is usually my preference over the huge soundstage of IE-800 for example). The HA-FX850 takes you one step closer, like you're in the same room as the band, with the singer 2 meters from you). Basically, the HA-FX850 have an intimate soundstage similar to Shure SE535SE (the Red ones), although their signatures are largely different of course.

- Balance: well, even with the bass port close, ASG-2 were always quite heavy on the bass, although overall they would still seem pretty flat for my taste, with good mids and nice treble without sibilance. ASG-2 were my first IEMS where I did not use the equalizer at all. HA-FX850 continue with this trend, with a warm signature but not V-shaped like HA-FX700 were, with mids forward enough to make the overall balance natural.

- Bass: plenty for both IEMs but they still feel different. Bass on the ASG-2 is a beast barely contained (high ipact, but not much bleed into the mids) thanks to the huge driver (and don't you dare opening that bass port!). Bass with the HA-FX850 is equally impressive but with a faster decay making it more controlled. Nice progress over the HA-FX700.

- Medium: warm and nicely present on both IEMs. Voices feel a bit closer on HA-FX850 although the clarity is remarkable for both IEMs. JVC has gone a long way from HA-FX700 where clarity was already awesome but where the lower part of the midrange was largely hidden behind the bleeding bass.

- Treble: mellow and relaxed on the ASG-2 (no sibilence, unlike the shrieking ASG-1), so easy to listen. Treble on the HA-FX850 has faster decay, like the bass, making it sound more lively, but it's far from being harsh or dry.

- Confort: ASG-2 fit my ears like a hand in a glove, I tend to forget them fast. HA-FX850 are heavier, they stick out of the ear a bit more and I had to fiddle to get a proper seal, not to deep, not too shallow. Once it's in place though, they're confortable. But I wouldn't imagine doing sport with the JVCs, while it's an awesome experience to do sport with ASG-2.

- Build quality: good for ASG-2, although I have to send them back after one year because the left connection starts to cause problems, the Epic cable is excellent. HA-FX850 look like a luxury item, the finish is impeccable although they're made in China, unlike their predecessor the HA-FX700 (made in Japan). The cable is very good , with sturdy connectors and not much memory. Too bad it's difficult to use replacement cables for Shures on the HA-FX850, since they often come with over-the-ear guidewires. The HA-FX850 are not easily worn over the ear.

- Noise isolation: average for both IEMs, partially due to the monoflange I used. it would get better with dual or triple flange tips, but these are too small for my ear canals even in L size. Also, I tend not to like longer tips because they make IEMs sound less natural.

Conclusion: for people who like warm signature with rich bass and forward vocals, JVC has done an awesome job with the HA-FX850. For half the price of ASG-2, you get IEMS with a signature which is pretty close, with a bit more tightness in the bass and treble, and a more intimate soundstage. They feel a bit heavy for sports (due to their high quality build and long shape).


Warning: fans of multi-BA IEMs with uber clarity and analytical sound should stay away from these, same thing for people who appreciate cathedral-like soundstages (IE-800...).


Nice comparison!
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 7:31 AM Post #1,658 of 3,535
I just received my FX850 and have been listening for the last few hours from my Fiio X3. I find the smaller foam tips the best fit overall. I was very very shocked by how deep and strong the bass can kick on these. I was listening to some Zedd, Pendulum, Gramatik, Justice and assorted kpop and western pop and it hits hard and rumbles. Every bit as satisfying as the Philips X1 bass if not more fulfilling. The treble is nice and controlled for me and female vocals are forward and detailed to my liking. Much better for my styles than the Heir 4.ai I heard, which is a completely different sound. That one was too dry and not thick enough. Soundstaging and imaging are awesome, better than the Heir - which is already fairly above average for an iem. I just keep thinking how awesome these are, especially for contemporary music. 
 
New toy syndrome maybe, but these kick copious amounts of backside. All while looking like the classiest kid on the block. JVC you've outdone yourself 
basshead.gif
 
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 5:10 PM Post #1,659 of 3,535
Great comparison and thoughts tienbasse. I'm also looking forward to more impression with an amp in the chain as there's a few who mentioned the scalability of the 850. It would be greatly appreciated.


Well, my choice of amp is quite limited at the moment, I have a Pico Amp (not exactly powerful but usually quite good at revealing a bit more treble ^^) and a FiiO E7 (not that great for anything in my opinion).
I'll give it a try next week-end.
 
Jul 21, 2014 at 9:42 PM Post #1,660 of 3,535
Well, my choice of amp is quite limited at the moment, I have a Pico Amp (not exactly powerful but usually quite good at revealing a bit more treble ^^) and a FiiO E7 (not that great for anything in my opinion).
I'll give it a try next week-end.


Very much appreciated. I also have the E7, and never really use it's amp section but use it as a dac docked on the E9.

I do want to have a nice dac/amp to replace the E7. But it must be one that will mate up well with the 850. I have been thinking about the iDSD Nano but if there's others to be considered, I'll be interested to learn more. So, thanks in advance and looking forward to more thoughts and inputs
 
Jul 22, 2014 at 7:23 AM Post #1,661 of 3,535


With the current setup state I was only able to test out FX850 with the iDAC (with iUSBpower) and my ol'93spec cable (did not bring the stock cable due to impromptu visit)

Listening to Dr.Chesky's binaural recordings were a treat, partly accounting to the silver cable, the entire sound is wide open, each instruments from the trumpets and horn duo to my left, another to the right on "Back Home Again In Indiana"-

-each nuances and pops of the vocals on the following track 'phrases', clean and quick drum kicks and rumbles-

-switching to more vocal tracks, the entire presentation boldens up and come more forward but gives up the air and transparency on Lisa Ono's 'Quizas Quizas Quizas'-

-jumping to more modern genre namely 'jpop' and 'kpop', the FX850 continues to sounds effortless, however on this genre the difference in presentation between this and DX90 headphone out became apparent-

-idac seems to push/compress the spatial cues in a linear line from my 3 o clock to 9 o clock but I could still pick out each cues and is overall more lively and discharges more dynamic energy; DX90 on the otherhand does not yield to the pop genre in terms of presentation and sounds more smoother in contrast to the more energetic sound of the idac.


I felt that the stock cables or even a premium copper cable would pair the FX850s up better to the idac imo last but not least.
 
Jul 22, 2014 at 9:56 AM Post #1,663 of 3,535
[UPDATE]

Since its on the way back home, I hopped over to another outlet where I was finally able to audition the iCAN Micro.

First impression was that these sounded completely different from the iDAC.

The iDAC had a shrilly quality to it that reveals itself gradually over a short time which made it unlistenable for long sessions; the iCAN micro on the otherhand, doesn't really adds anything to the FX850s, only heightening its dynamics and wider, realistic imaging via its 3D Holographic tweaked to the max.

Treble-wise these adds more twinkling sparkle to the FX850, something that the 93spec cable has already did, despite the twofold extensions from both the cable and the ican micro, the FX850 remained clean and smooth. The treble in this state allows the FX850 to be able to stand up to several multi-ala-treble-proud-BA offerings.

Midrange - Vocals gains a sense of airiness backed up by a notch up its level of timbre and tonal accuracy, instruments shines through with even more effortless transparency than it did with the iDAC.
 
Jul 22, 2014 at 9:59 AM Post #1,664 of 3,535
Bass (with X-Bass - Rather than saying that mid-bass has been reduced, I would say that the iCAN micro has did a decent job shifting the bass south a little towards the rumbling sub-bass region. This retains or in fact heigtened the overall fun factor while having more clarity and imaging when the 3D-Holo mode is being turned to the optimum.

Presentation - The presentation of the FX850 on 3d-Holo mode at optimum, deserves the most mention imho.

While the spatial arc is a mere increment (from my 10'o clock to 2'o clock)-

-this is not that simple. The iCAN micro takes imaging within this spatial range to another level, resulting in even more musicality, intangibly flexibility in adapting to different recordings, henceforth delivering more sense of space and airiness, rending it with more resolution, power and control over the entire spectrum.

For reference, the ican micro just made the FX850 on 93spec sounds like a considerable fraction of the Unique Melody PP6 but at a even smaller fraction of the price.

Dsnuts truly deserves another big thumbs-up for yet another great discovery for fellow FX850 users.


If i do not find out-performers or planning any savings for big purchase, looks like this is on my next list once my payday arrive, let's hope the upcoming iDSD micro is going to be even better!
 
Jul 22, 2014 at 10:04 AM Post #1,665 of 3,535
Nice write up kendric. Thanks for the effort. Anyway, is there a hissing issue from your listening session? 


The iDAC sounds just fine hissing-wise, however there seems to be more noise floor whenever I adjust the volume knob when compared to the iCAN micro (with all 4 gain switches on the bottom being turned off)

The iCAN micro was silent even when adjusting the volume knob, although hisses and audible noise floor would start to occur even at overall medium gain (with switch 3 and 4 being turned on at the bottom)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top