I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the opinion you responded to. I'm sorry if I didn't make that more clear.
OK, no problem.
I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the opinion you responded to. I'm sorry if I didn't make that more clear.
It was clear from my post that I was conveying my personal experience having given it a preliminary listen before burning it in.
I shall suppose that you accidentally misunderstood me. Please read more carefully and respond more considerately.
I think RooMe was referring to this post:
TBH I don't think it's possible for a set to be more overrated (on here) than the Mikros 90. I haven't even heard them but for a pair of $300 headphones marked down to $60 you'd think they're the greatest product to grace the audio world from the way that threat goes bananas over them. I've never heard of people stockpiling a single kind of headphone before.
That's not an unreasonable judgment if the thread is really like that.
Honestly, stop giving His Dudeness grief.
That's not an unreasonable judgment if the thread is really like that.
Honestly, stop giving His Dudeness grief. If he had pretended to hear them and bashed them, by all means let him have it because that's a foul. But he wrote outright that he hadn't heard them and explained why he's dubious. I don't have such a problem with that.
's cool if I put more than one headphones in both right? Please note that this only applies to the Head-Fi community
Most overrated headphones:
-> Sennheiser HD600/650 (the second recommended candidate right after M50 to any newcomer/starter)
-> V-Moda M-100 (poor price to performance ratio relatively)
-> Monster Turbine series (honestly for the price you pay for them you can get better)
-> Every wood audio-technica (self-explanatory; some people like to pay premium more than the non-wood version/model just to damage the environment)
-> and lastly the ATH-M50 (it's like nothing else is better for a newbie to get as their first headphone)
Most underrated headphones:
-> Klipsch Image X7i (ceramic housing, excellent isolation, and very balanced and neutral. Too bad nobody cares about it here)
-> Every Phillips circumaural headphone (they're worth every penny. Until you get told by 10 people to just get the M50s...)
-> Every Victor branded (Japan exclusive) high end flagship headphones i.e. Kenwood KH-1000 (regional availability is no excuse!)
-> Red Giant dynamic IEMs (technically superior drivers, great accessories and low profit margin)
my honest opinions.
I've never heard any audio-technica's but I seriously doubt that wood has anything to do with them sounding bad. There are a lot of tone woods that in particular give a pleasant sound.
Overrated: Sennheiser 600/650 (midrange suckout)
Overrated: Sennheiser 600/650 (midrange suckout)
Underrated: Grado PS500
Although I didn't like the HD650 and ended up selling my pair, I can totally understand why people love them.
What do you mean by 'suckout' ?
Suckout means it measures below the flat FR line in the midrange. So you hear less midrange than is there.
I can too but they are often mistakenly held up as an example of neutrality which isn't true.
Agreed on both points. TBH I think the HD650s are almost underrated from the audiophile perspective. I'd rather have those than any >$1000 pair I've tried.