Do you consider the mids to be more neutral? Or is there more of a V-shaped frequency w/ 3.2?
I may be losing my mind but I think I'm liking the 3.0 these better than my beloved HD600. Probably just infatuation and all...but the HD600 is sounding so thin in comparison..
I think the 3.2 tune up brought a more balanced and full sound. The changes aren't night an day, but definitely noticeable. The 3.0 is slight too dark/warm in comparison to the 3.2. The presentation of the 3.2 is definitely a step in the right direction to become more more full sound.
3.2 > 3.0 IMO (Some may find the thicker, more intimate sound to be more engaging, especially with specific genres)
Edited by Greed - 8/16/13 at 4:41pm