Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Sony MH1 R&D Story ...and discussion.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sony MH1 R&D Story ...and discussion. - Page 15

post #211 of 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by higbvuyb View Post

 

Thanks for coming here to answer our questions, Sead.

 

I wanted to ask about the MH750. I read that it was based on the FR of the MH1. Were you involved in the MH750? How does it differ?

 

Yes, i was involved in MH750, and since MH1 and MH750 can be seen as relatives I will mention few words about it. MH750 is a more economical version of MH1 with somewhat slightly different signature as can be seen below...  

 

1000

... most part of the midrange is similar but there are some differences at the lower and upper range. Subbass is slightly higher, while treble roll offs somewhat earlier. So compared to the MH1, overall sound signature of the MH750 can be perceived as slightly darker... further, as there is less energy at the top-end in combination with some more presence in mid-treble will lead to impression of some small treble coloration, and less overall detail compared to MH1.   

post #212 of 218
Quote:

Originally Posted by kiteki View Post

 

On my computer in uLilith media player using the MH1, I reduced the bass -7dB from 100Hz to 250Hz, then increased 16kHz by 4dB.  Since then I've been listening to the same 5 songs for a few hours on repeat (CD - L'Ame Imortelle - Fallen Angel), it is pretty insanely dazzling for a smartphone bundled IEM, especially for the typical user.

 

Kiteki! Between the MH1 and the MH1C, which do you prefer? According to Rin and forum member Tangster who compared both, MH1C has more bass? But ClieOS and Sead said that they should be the same?

 

Which one should I get?

 

Thanks.

post #213 of 218

Here is a brief bit about them in a round up review video!

 

post #214 of 218
I'm new to the world of quality headphones. Thanks to head fi I've been introduced to test only the ksc75 8320 so far and now the mh1c.

At first they don't sound great. So smooth I wasn't sure it sounded correct. With the bass drowning the soundscape. It's not bad in fact it makes apparent how lacking the 8320 is.

With the air vent blocked it's still a tad too much. Dropping -2 eq in bass with the mod sounds great.

I tried the treble foam mod. Found the treble noticeably clearer but at the expense of not being able to listen as loud because of an instant harshness fatigue feeling. With the foam back in an increase of 4 in treble that's recommended by some makes high vocals sound static low bit rate like. Cutting the foam in half to get the balance right works superbly. Treble is now clear rather than smooth sounding and further reaching.

At the end of it all it's become a great sounding headphone. So smooth yet pronounced, so wide and well ranged. Thanks to all involved in making this budget iem noticeable and available. smily_headphones1.gif:thumbup::beer:

ߐ谟ВߐⰟҁߒ°ߒàGalaxy S3 ߙ˰ߙΰߙͰߙǰߙŰߙ̀ǰߙŰߙ̀
Edited by InfyAsiX - 1/6/13 at 12:18am
post #215 of 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sead View Post

 

Yes, i was involved in MH750, and since MH1 and MH750 can be seen as relatives I will mention few words about it. MH750 is a more economical version of MH1 with somewhat slightly different signature as can be seen below...  

 

 

Hi Sead, are you involved in developing other IEM's or is there anything else with similar sound signature as MH1? Thank you.


Edited by Jakkal - 2/3/13 at 4:01pm
post #216 of 218
 

 

 
Stereo Headset MH-EX300AP
 
[@ClieOs] will u review this?
 
Bundle with new Sony Xperia Smartphone lineup
post #217 of 218
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkkm007 View Post

 
 
Stereo Headset MH-EX300AP
 
[@ClieOs] will u review this?
 
Bundle with new Sony Xperia Smartphone lineup


Not unless Sead sent me a pair for free.

 

Just kidding. It looks like a regular EX300 turned into headset, I don't think I'll review it since we already has reviews on EX300 around.

post #218 of 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfyAsiX View Post

I'm new to the world of quality headphones. Thanks to head fi I've been introduced to test only the ksc75 8320 so far and now the mh1c.

At first they don't sound great. So smooth I wasn't sure it sounded correct. With the bass drowning the soundscape. It's not bad in fact it makes apparent how lacking the 8320 is.

With the air vent blocked it's still a tad too much. Dropping -2 eq in bass with the mod sounds great.

I tried the treble foam mod. Found the treble noticeably clearer but at the expense of not being able to listen as loud because of an instant harshness fatigue feeling. With the foam back in an increase of 4 in treble that's recommended by some makes high vocals sound static low bit rate like. Cutting the foam in half to get the balance right works superbly. Treble is now clear rather than smooth sounding and further reaching.

At the end of it all it's become a great sounding headphone. So smooth yet pronounced, so wide and well ranged. Thanks to all involved in making this budget iem noticeable and available. smily_headphones1.gif:thumbup::beer:

ߐ谟ВߐⰟҁߒ°ߒàGalaxy S3 ߙ˰ߙΰߙͰߙǰߙŰߙ̀ǰߙŰߙ̀
I just tried cutting the foam in half, and the sound signature now sounds a lot more appealing to me. On bass heavy songs the bass is still prominent, but on everything else they sound brilliant.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Sony MH1 R&D Story ...and discussion.