Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › SoundMAGIC HP100/HP150 Review and Impressions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

SoundMAGIC HP100/HP150 Review and Impressions Thread

post #1 of 1006
Thread Starter 

SoundMAGIC HP100 review

 

I would like to thank tony at soundmagic for asking me to review their First full size circumaural headphone, and I must say they have done a very good job.

 

I will try and write as honest a review as possible, and any opinions expressed are my own and others may not agree.

 

These have had 100 hours of burn in, as suggested by soundmagic, and differences were noticed, so do not judge them straight out of the box.

 

Gear Used:

IPod Classic 7G 160gb (rockboxed) > HP100

IPod Classic 7G 160gb (rockboxed) > Fiio L3 > JDS Labs C421 (AD8620) > HP100

 

_MG_4971.JPG

 

Specs:

Transducer: Dynamic 53mm

Frequency response: 10hz-30khz

Impedance: 32Ω

Sensitivity: 95db at 1Khz/mw

Max input power: 100mw

Cable length: 1.2m (4m extended)

Weight: 288g

Price: $200

 

DSC_0261.jpg

 

Packaging, Accessories, Build Quality and Comfort:

 

Packaging is quite attractive, with a simple white box with a picture of the HP100 on the front, a frequency graph and some info on one side, and various positions you can use the headphones in (folding, one ear etc…) on the other side. On the back it has the specifications and some more info.

 

Accessories are very good, a nice hard case, for transportation with a clip to clip it onto your bag, a flight adapter, a 3.5mm to 6.3mm screw on adapter and a cleaning cloth. Overall a very nice package, not missing anything, I do love the hard case.

 

_MG_4962.JPG

 

Build quality seems very sturdy, the headband is very flexible and is covered in pleather, the cups are plastic but the shiny plates are all metal. The extender arms are reinforced with metal and the single sided cable is detachable via a 3.5mm lock in plug (so no aftermarket cables I’m afraid). The cable is coiled but not particularly bulky or heavy and perfect size for portability, the strain relief on both jacks are very good and made of flexible rubber, the cable is medium in thickness. The pads are pleather and very soft, and also replaceable, I want to try some Beyerdynamic DT770 velour pads one day.

 

(One thing that bothers me is that the metal cup plates are like the backs of iPods, easily scratched, I mean very easily. I keep them in their case and baby them but they still have some minor scratches)

 

_MG_4969.JPG

 

Comfort is amazing, so many companies get it wrong and make uncomfortable headphones, these are fairly heavy but well padded, the headband has very soft padding and the pleather ear pads are super soft too, but soft in a comfy way and not compressed so you feel the plastic way. These rival the Beyerdynamic DT770 in the comfort department. My ears only get sweaty after long listening sessions

 

The isolation isn’t great but good enough for walking about with, but I don’t think these were made to be particularly portable.

 

The whole headphone kind of reminds me of the DT770 in style, with the circular cups and pads, and general shape. These can fold inward neatly (like the audio technica ATH-M50 and Shure SRHXXX), and the cups can rotate 90 degress to the back so you can use them on one ear, dj style. All hinges are metal and sturdy.

 

_MG_4972.JPG

 

Sound:

 

Heres the part you’ve all been waiting for:

 

Lows:

 

Not bass monsters, so bass heads need not apply, but the bass they do have has very good punch when needed and extends low with great control and detail. The bass is full bodied but not extremely fast in recovery, I think the full body of the bass helps as like this they don’t sound cold or thin and give an overall great body to the sound. I find the amount of bass perfect, if slightly above neutral. They handle EDM and Dubstep very well in my opinion and the bass does not bleed into the mids.

 

Mids:

 

I find the mids on these very transparent in the way that on some tracks the mids sound slightly behind, but not exactly recessed, but on others the mids are perfectly balanced between the lows and highs. The mids are detailed but never harsh and they don’t throw detail in your face. The mids are very smooth with only the slightest hint of sibilance (mainly on bad recordings). They portray vocals very naturally but electric guitars do lose some power.

 

Highs:

 

Great is a good word to describe the highs, never harsh or bright, with the right amount of presence (a little bit more forward wouldn’t hurt though). Details in the highs are easy to pick out and they extend very well with a good amount of sparkle. The decay and shimmer is perfect for my liking. Every tap and crash of cymbals can be heard with great detail and never become splashy.

 

Soundstage, Imaging and Instrument Separation:

 

The soundstage is one of this cans strong points, it reminds me of the DT770 with great width, depth and height.

 

Imaging is also done very well but not quite as good as my Shure SRH440.

 

Instrument separation is good, there is enough space between the lows, mids and highs, but these don’t have an airy presentation so the space between the instruments isn’t that big.

 

Conclusion

 

I think soundmagic have done a marvelous job with their first full sized closed cans. There are a lot of options in the sub $200 zone and these do a great job at fitting in. I think depending on your preference there are better options, but for a great all rounder that you can throw anything at and it will sound great, then these are very good. They are easy to listen to and have no real weak points, with a smooth non fatiguing sound with amazing comfort you cannot go wrong.

 

They are balanced, but not neutral with a sense of warmth and thickness to the sound, but they just sound very natural playing whatever genre you like. I cannot hear any major dips or peaks in the frequency response.

 

I must say I can’t think of a better option for music, gaming, movies or TV, they out do the DT770 in my opinion.

 

Amping

 

These really do benefit from amping, as i find them to sound flat and boring just driven from my iPod, adding an amp brings out the bass, and widens the soundstage and just brings out the best in them. Also they are not very sensitive so you will have to crank up the volume of you portable source to get decent listening volumes.

 

_MG_4970.JPG

 

I hope you enjoyed this review, any comments are welcome with tips to make my reviews better

 

Tracks Used:

Skrillex – First Of The Year (Equinox) (320kbps MP3)

Paramore – Franklin (320kbps MP3)

Diana Krall – The Girl In The Other Room (FLAC)

Deolinda – Passou Por Mim E Sorriu (live) (ALAC)

Suicide Silence – Unanswered (FLAC)

Massive Attack – Angel (ALAC)

Eat Static – Dzhopa Dream (ALAC)

The XX – Crystalised (FLAC)

Funeral For A Friend – Bend Your Arms To Look Like Wings (ALAC)

Mumford & Sons – Little Lion Man (FLAC)

The Scene Aesthetic – Humans (259kbps MP3)

A Hero A Fake – Swallowed By The Sea (254kbps MP3)

Vivaldi – The Four Seasons, Spring Allegro (ALAC)

Johnny Craig – Children Of Divorce (161kbps MP3)

Deadmau5 + Kaskade – I Remember (Caspa Remix) (320kbps MP3)

Black Uhuru – Utterance (ALAC)

We Are The In Crowd – Never Be What You Want (226kbps MP3)

Silverstein – Discovering The Waterfront (320kbps MP3)

Concept Of Thought – Our Thought (FLAC)

Nirvana – Something In The Way (Unplugged) (ALAC)

 

Oscar Stewart


Edited by ostewart - 7/1/12 at 1:46pm
post #2 of 1006

Nice review! Good job :)
 

post #3 of 1006

how much are they?

post #4 of 1006
Thread Starter 
$200
post #5 of 1006
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleaK View Post

Nice review! Good job smily_headphones1.gif

 

Thanks smily_headphones1.gif
post #6 of 1006

Nice review. Good job!

Very detailed headphones but still not understand what AMP source need to use for geting deep bass)))

post #7 of 1006
Thread Starter 
They have bass out of a portable source, but amping them just brings out the tones better, it doesn't add more bass, it just improves it, with better control and impact. Hope that helps explain a bit.
post #8 of 1006

Ok, I will try with E17 AMP

post #9 of 1006
Thread Starter 
I'll be getting an E17 to review soon, will be interesting to see how it matches with the HP100
post #10 of 1006
Thread Starter 

The HP100 with E17 works very well, and are a good match, and also with the treble and bass controls you can tailor the sound to your liking.

these really do need an amp.

post #11 of 1006

How do you think these compare to Shure 840? Also, are they portable?

post #12 of 1006
Thread Starter 
Ive only had the SRH440 and much prefer these, as these sound more natural, but the 440 is more balanced and a bit cold. They are quite big but they could be used as portable cans, the isolation isnt as good as the Shures though, and these benefit a lot from amping. These are very versatile and do everything well.
I sold my 440's after I got these.
post #13 of 1006

Ok, thank you!

post #14 of 1006
Thread Starter 
Just got news that advancedmp3players.co.uk week be stocking these beauties soon!
post #15 of 1006

I just noticed the AMP3 have the HP100 on their front page, although like most of their stuff it says OOS at the moment :(.

 

I just got a pair for review and so far I am loving them very much. I have been using the VModa M-80 mostly at work but found them a little too uncomfortable to wear for too long so have been looking for a nice well isolating over-ear to take their place (although I have also ordered the M-100). So far the SoundMAGIC is totally doing it for me. The bass is nicer (generally smoother and more controlled), it is a surprisingly neutral sound, but it changes a lot depending on amps. I first had it through the Yulong D100 mkII and it's great but then tried it through the Arcam rPAC and OMG the bass!! Damn this bass is so nice with this combo. I sanity checked this by giving them to an audio guy at work and he plugged them directly to his computer (****ty soundcard), he liked them but not as much as his ATH-M50s. Then the next day I gave him the headphones again, but this time with the rPAC, this time he comes to me and tells me how much better than the M50s they were. Now I am not a huge fan of the M50s, but this is coming from a big, big fan of them.

 

For me the HP100 bests the V-Moda M-80, not only because of the fit and the isolation (oh and the isolation is almost as good as an active noise cancelling HP), but also the bass and the highs are more punchy and the detail retrieval is better. I'm very curious to see how the M-100 copes with this level of competition... 

 

Next week I will have the M-100 and the Mad Dog (Fostex T50rp Mod)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › SoundMAGIC HP100/HP150 Review and Impressions Thread