Quote:
Quote:
I don't doubt you, but could you please elaborate?
Kinda hard to elaborte. The question was if the New Cks's could match the old CKS bass and the answer is no, not at all. Be it Punch, or rumble the cks77 comes out on top. The new CKS are waaaay more focused on mids than the bass imo. Extremely bigger soundstage and better clarity on these new ones as well. Bass and general full bodied-ness the 77 eats the newer ones whole. If you want a bass upgrade to the 77, I have to recommend the JVC FXZ200, I honestly said "where the hell did the bass go" when I tried to go back to my cks77's after the JVC.
This is exactly the comparison I had been looking/waiting for. That is, the change in bass impact between the CKS77 and the newer "solid bass" ATH IEMs. The upgrade challenge with the CKS77 is to keep the same bass impact with better mids and highs. Getting better mids and highs with a reduction in bass impact is not an upgrade. Call it something else, but not an upgrade. Those who like a lot of bass, but would be happy with less bass impact than that provided by the CKS77, will think of the new solid bass as an upgrade even if they were not. Those of us who would not be as happy with a lower bass impact than what the CKS77 have, such as quisxx, SAM63 and I, would only see as an upgrade something with the same or greater bass impact and better mids and highs.
I gave my CKS77 to a friend of mine, knowing that he enjoyed them as much as I did. Since I see him often, I borrowed them for the weekend. Listening to them again, I have just realized that cleaning the mids and highs at the expense of less bass impact would not be an upgrade for me.
Look at the posts linked below to have a better picture of what quisxx is writing about. It seems like SAM63 had not found the FXZ200 bass until his last post. But, quisxx did!
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/1365#post_9006220
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/1515#post_9016681
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2010#post_9049031
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2625#post_9197200
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2625#post_9197236
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2625#post_9197253
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2625#post_9197382
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2625#post_9197845
http://www.head-fi.org/t/632273/jvc-ha-fxz-100-200/2625#post_9197852
Now, I have a question for you, quisxx: How do the mids and highs of the FXZ200 compare to those of the CKS77?