Jack Johnson - Dreams be Dreams
Massive Attack - Protection
Michael Jackson - Liberian Girl
Jack Johnson - Dreams be Dreams
Massive Attack - Protection
Michael Jackson - Liberian Girl
I noticed that you also have a Parasound HD1600. Have you had the chance to listen to the SR-009 with it?
Would definitely love to hear your impressions of the LCD-2s on the stackerII as well. :)
Just a generalized question here: Overall, do you like the LCD-2 better than the 009? Also, did you give the 009's enough burn-in time?
I have a feeling that the mid of the SR009 is a little more forwading than the LCD2, while the bass quantity
impact has to go to the LCDs. The treble of the SR009 is much better and exttended high, not too overbright.
The soundstage and detail of the SR009 is definitely better.
Please compare the SR009 with the O2mkI or O2mkII
Hi Currawong,
Too funny. I was also thinking about my old HD-800 thread as I was trying to tear apart the build quality and design of the 009. Yes, I have been studying your photos for quite a bit and the 009 seems to be built without compromise (your photos are excellent, by the way). I am keeping my fingers crossed that headphones like the 009, LCD-2, HiFiMan HE-6, and the Ultrasone Edition 10 have set the new standard for build quality in headphone design. I look forward to reading more of your listening impressions. Take care.
Some more thoughts. Rather like the LCD-2s did originally, the 009's capabilities crept up on me with use. With initial comparisons, the brighter 009s, using what I have, do seem to take the lead. The usual cliché about hearing things in the music not heard before applies here. I think Lunatique was spot-on about the 2-3kHz range in the LCD-2s needing a boost though, so I will be springing for the new, thicker pads. With both headphones, they stay more towards the "neutral" side of things, allowing the music itself to shine through. This is very apparent if you EQ up the bass and treble with the LCD-2s. My original Symphones Magnums, with a FR more akin to the 325is they were based upon, were very like the 009s -- bright with more forward mids. They too had pinpoint imaging and were glorious with instruments and vocals, if not having quite as much bass as some tracks could do with.
I'm amazed you can listen to Norah Jones any anything that is revealing. The first time I tried to listen to The Fall was at a meet with HD800s and I could only take about 15 seconds.
Interesting read, thanks.
I’d be willing to bet that Stax Mafia hardliners would blame any SR-009 bass impact and extension limitations on the relatively modest amp you currently have. And I’d have no reason to doubt them.
These impressions are still extremely useful for those of us ichin’ to take the Stax plunge without already having an uber amp. Please keep the impressions coming Currawong.
Moar power is always better but it will still be an electrostatic. If you listen to those almost all of the time you don't really notice that they might lack a bit here and you really start to appreciate their other qualities (e.g. very airy and effortless). But the headphones that I listen to most of the time (HD250II) have quite a big kick in the bass so it can be felt (but on other aspects, it is no contest against the O2).

Moar power is always better but it will still be an electrostatic. If you listen to those almost all of the time you don't really notice that might they lack a bit here and you really start to appreciate their other qualities (e.g. very airy and effortless). But headphone that I listen to most of the time has quite a big kick in the bass so I did notice it.
Definitely. Before sitting down and doing the comparison, I only felt like listening to the 009s exclusively. I didn't think I'd enjoy going back to the LCD-2s (and missed the 009s while I was waiting for a replacement pair). But focussing on a variety of music made me reconsider my feelings somewhat. It helps with both pairs to listen to music with them exclusively for this kind of reason.
I'm curious how the LCD-2 with my custom EQ curve sounds compared to the SR-009. If you ever get the chance, and are interested, could you maybe try using my EQ curve on the LCD-2 and then compare to the SR-009?
My latest fine-tuning of the custom EQ curve for the LCD-2 looks like this:
The bass boost is not meant to be neutral/accurate. I sometimes have it for those times when I want to really feel the visceral impact of the bass so I can somewhat get back the satisfaction I would get with speakers. For critical listening, you should not boost the bass as shown in the screencap.
The treble and mids are fine-tuned to fill out any dips I can perceive when A/B with my Klein + Hummel rig (with ARC System and custom EQ), as well as taking the FR graph Audez'e included into consideration. Obviously you should never fill out all the dips so it's perfectly flat, because that would be way too bright, so I placed more emphasis on just listening and comparing with all my other headphones and speakers, in order to arrive at the most neutral sound IMO for the LCD-2.
BTW, this is my LCD-2's FR graph:
I also have a custom EQ curve for the SR-007mk2, so if you're interested, I can post that one too.
I have long been advocating that instead of spending money on more headphones and amps, it's much better to learn how to EQ like a professional audio engineer and "upgrade" your headphones for no cost (even freeware audio plugins get the job done beautifully). I can make mid-range headphones sound like headphones that cost double or triple, and I can get rid of all the little "regrets" that we have with high-end headphones and make them sound essentially perfect (according to my ideal of neutrality and accuracy, and on occasions, pushed a bit more for extra satisfaction).