Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › [REVIEW] a-JAYS Two, a-JAYS Three and t-JAYS Two: The Budget Invasion
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[REVIEW] a-JAYS Two, a-JAYS Three and t-JAYS Two: The Budget Invasion

post #1 of 31
Thread Starter 

I think it goes without saying that the sub$100 category of the IEM market now has some of the most intense competition. It is never a bad thing for the consumer since the price / performance ratio of these IEM has been driven to a historical height. The SQ that used to be priced around $150 just a few years ago can be obtained for almost half the price now.  The only loser seems to be the big brands, which still insists on a more rigid pricing policy that makes them vulnerable to the flexible small brands when it comes to bigger bang for the bucks. Though there are still a large portion of headphone buyer who prefer to buy big brand just for the peace of mind, any smart consumer that does his/her research will know there are a lot of good offering in the market beyond the typical big chain stores’ offering. On the fact that you are reading this review is already a good indication that you are trying to avoid those IEM with too-colorful-of-a-packaging and mass marketing. Yes, you won’t eat bright and colorful fungi or animal lying around the forest in survival situation and thus you should avoid the same stuff when shopping for headphone as well.


This year we have seen a chance in JAYS’ direction as they introduced 2 new lines of a more budget / entry level products, the a-JAYS and t-JAYS. Each line consists of three models: One, Two and Three with a total of 6 models in the two lines combined. On just the look, it might seem that the only difference between the three models of the same line is the amount of accessories, which couldn’t be more wrong. In fact, a-JAYS One, Two, and Three don’t sound like each other, nor do the t-JAYS One, Two, or Three.  It seems like it is JAYS’ intention to have the six models forming a ladder of sound quality increment, with a-JAYS One in the bottom and t-JAYS Three on the top (followed by even better JAYS’ IEM  of course), fulfilling different demand from different level of market. I must say this is a very smart marketing and product development on JAYS’ part, though I also think perhaps 4 models (two each) might have been even better. Regardless, we are only going to focus on three models out of the six: a-JAYS Two, a-JAYS Three and t-JAYS Two.

 

SPEC

aJ2-01.jpg

 

aJ2-02.jpg

 

a-JAY Two
Driver: 8.6 mm Custom Speaker
Sensitivity: 96dB @ 1kHz
Impedance: 16 Ohm @ 1kHz
Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 20 000 Hz
Cord: TPE coated flat tangle free cable, L 115 cm (45 in)
Weight: 14 grams (0.49 oz)
Plug: Straight gold-plated stereo plug 3.5mm (1/8 in)
Colour: Deep High Gloss Black

 

aJ3-01.jpg

 

aJ3-02.jpg


a-JAYS Three
Driver: 8.6 mm TCD Speaker
Sensitivity: 97dB @ 1kHz
Impedance: 16 Ohm @ 1kHz
Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 22 000 Hz
Cord: TPE coated flat tangle free cable, L 115 cm (45 in)
Weight: 14 grams (0.49 oz)
Plug: Straight gold-plated stereo plug 3.5mm (1/8 in)
Colour: Rubber Coated Black

 

tJ2-01.jpg

 

tJ2-02.jpg


t-JAYS Two
Driver: 10mm Custom Dynamic Speaker
Sensitivity: 97 dB SPL @ 1 kHz
Impedance: 16 Ohm @ 1 kHz
Frequency Response: 17Hz - 22 000 Hz
Cord: L 0.60 m (~24 inch) + 0.70 m (~35 inch) extension cord, W 2/1.5 mm (0.079/0.059 inch)
Weight: 8 grams (0.28 oz)
Plug: Straight, Gold-Plated Stereo Mini-Plug 3.5 mm (1.8 in)

Colour: Deep High Gloss Black


Packaging, Build Quality and Accessories
Packaging is identical among a-JAYS and t-JAYS. It is basically a plastic elliptical shaped container where the inner housing was locked inside an outer shell. You will need to break the paper seal on top of the locking mechanism (a small hook) before you can open the package, ensuring you that you are the first person who has access to the inner goodies. These are possibly some of the best packaging in the sub$100 category.

 

aJ2-03.jpg

 

aJ2-04.jpg

 

aJ3-03.jpg

 

aJ3-04.jpg


As one of JAYS’ specialty, build quality is among the best of its price class. A few things to note are that there isn’t any real strain relief on a-JAYS. The flat cable does take stress better than typical thin cable and doesn’t seem that they will fail easily. However, the extra weight of the cable becomes a little annoying before getting used to. Also, since the cable is the rubberized type with wide surface, it doesn’t get tangled easily but tends to have just a bit more microphonics. You can still wear it over-the-ear to cut down microphonics, but the flat cable isn’t the most suited for bending around. The good news is that once it is in place, the cable will stay in well because of its own weight. On the other hand, t-JAY has much thinner cable with two pieces design. The overall design is still fairly light and doesn’t feel to be ‘weight down’ as much as the a-JAYS. The only concern is the design of the ear pieces. It is very beautiful to look at and seems smarter compared to other side-porting solutions for large dynamic transducer (i.e. Sony MDR-EX700 or Radius HP-TWF11R). However, the angle of the housing and its nozzle means it might be a little more difficult for people with very small outer ears to get a good seal without the housing pushing against the ears. Though for most people, I reckon this shouldn’t be much of a problem. Another thing about the earpiece is that t-JAYS isn’t designed to be wore over-the-ear. The only way to do it will be to swap the channels, which is ridiculous. It would have been easier for JAYS to include a channels swapping adapter so wearing the IEM over-the-ears doesn’t mean a person has to listen to left channel in right ear and vice versa. Isolation wise, both a-JAYS models are about average while t-JAYS Two is just a little above average.

 

tJ2-03.jpg

 

tJ2-04.jpg

 

tJ2-05.jpg


Accessories wise, it is quite similar between the three models. The basic stuff in the package is the 5 pair of eartips (XXS, XS, S, M, L). The 3.5mm splitter and airplane adapter are available for the Two and Three models, while the carrying case is only for the Three models. No matter which model you get however, there is still a very generous two years warranty. The new carrying case is better than the old tiny leather case that JAYS included with s-JAYS or q-JAYS on the fact that it is more spacious, but it falls short as the swivel mechanism becomes too loose after a few use and the case starts to open itself up in the backpack.  It is good for stationary storage, but I would recommend something else for carrying around.

 

aJ2-06.jpg


Sound Quality
As usual, all three IEM have been given at least 50 hours of solid burn-in before the review. Being dynamic transducer based IEM and tuned toward the general public’s listening habit, one thing can be said is that none of these IEM lacks bass. In fact, it could be just a little too much bass in some model if you are not a basshead. So if you are a self-proclaim analytical listener or like others to refer you as a very serious audiophile, these more colored sounding IEM might not be best for you. Then again if you want to try something different, these are not that bad a choice either.

 

aJ2-05.jpg


The overall sound signature of a-JAYS Two is very warm with big bass and smooth top. Bass reaches deep but bloated, though still within reason and has some control. Mid is full and has a decently sweet vocal. Treble does extend fairly high but in a smooth and sparkle-less fashion. Soundstage is average. Good for vocal and pop songs in general but not suitable for instrument or classical. An upgraded sound from the old Creative EP-630.

 

aJ3-05.jpg


The overall sound signature of a-JAYS Three is warm, fairly balanced though biased toward bass. Bass has good impact and very decent amount, not quite as much as a-JAYS Two but still a little bloated. Mid seems slightly recessed in comparison which gives a better sense of space while still maintains a decent amount of texture in vocal. Treble also extends fairly high and with decent amount of sparkle and detail, not enough to be called analytical and there are still some rough edges, though nothing out of the ordinary. Soundstage is a little above average. Good for most genre of music but don’t excel in any particular. An upgraded sound from the old Sennheiser CX300.

 

tJ2-06.jpg


The overall sound signature of t-JAYS Two is warm to slightly dark, mid centric, smooth and just a little laid back. Bass has decent impact, quantity and control, though just a tad slow. Mid is well bodied and render a sweet, but not too sweet of a vocal that is good in texture. Treble has sparkle but in much smoother fashion, rolls off just a little at the top end and misses some of the highest note, but nothing terrible. Soundstage is a little above average. Good for most vocal based music, rock and pop in general but still performs instrument and classical in decent manner. A decent choice over the now discontinued s-JAYS.


Verdict
Though not a giant killer by themselves, JAYS has created IEM that are in good balance of price, performance, build quality, accessories and warranty. Plus, the stylish and bold design is nothing but icing on the cake


The current price of a-JAYS Two, a-JAYS Three and t-JAYS Two is US$50, US$60, and US$90 respectively. If you are in UK, you might be able to pick them up for cheaper price.

 

Please refer to the list for a complete list of rating.


Edited by ClieOS - 12/8/10 at 8:21pm
post #2 of 31

nice write up as always

post #3 of 31

Thanks for the review.  I was actually about to buy these awhile ago, but after reading this I'm glad I didnt.

post #4 of 31

the THREEs are now $60 at Amazon... good buy perhaps?

post #5 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiriuslyCold View Post

the THREEs are now $60 at Amazon... good buy perhaps?


I believe $60 is the original MSRP.
post #6 of 31

are you sure - in your review you did have it at $60 but I thought you'd switched the position TWO can't be $90 can it? 

post #7 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiriuslyCold View Post

are you sure - in your review you did have it at $60 but I thought you'd switched the position TWO can't be $90 can it? 

I think you might have read the review wrongly. It is t-JAYS Two that is $90, not a-JAYS Three. Yes, their name are confusing.

a-JAYS Two - $50
a-JAYS Three - $60
t-JAYS Two - $90
Quote:
The current price of a-JAYS Two, a-JAYS Three and t-JAYS Two is US$50, US$60, and US$90 respectively.
post #8 of 31

ah ok. someone should give the product team leader a smack upside the head. they're also confusing to search

post #9 of 31

just bought A-jays two while my westone 3 are gone for replacement.

 

have to say...they give more value for money than any iem i ve heard...especially at this price.

 

and packaging is so good...Westone should learn from this company when it comes to making product look more expensive than it actually is.

 

 

ya the bass is bit bloated but not muddy at all...if u use treble booster in EQ settings..that bloat goes away.

 

great for listening to trance or rock music while commuting or while gyming..the sound should more than appeal to people who listen to mainstream music because of the sound signature.

 

 

and for an audiophile with top tier iem...these should be the perfect secondary iems.

 

post #10 of 31

I spent virtually the entire weekend going over reviews of various sub-$100 IEMs, esp ljokerl's epic thread, only to find myself ordering the aJays 3 on the basis of the fact that I could get them from an online retailer I trust. I know there are fake fullsize headphones out there, but it just seems to be an entire industry putting out fake IEMs - read some of the threads on fake Turbine Pro (Cooper and Gold) - scary stuff to think you could get lumbered with something like that.

 

Anyway, eagerly awaiting the arrival of something with more bass punch than my PL50s.

 

 

post #11 of 31
Thread Starter 

One thing you won't need to worry about JAYS is fake. They are so well made that it probably make it very difficult to match the build quality and design.

post #12 of 31

I have a-jays three, and it is fantastic for the price, given it is under $80 or something now. I also put comply foam on it, and it become even better. However, as much as I love the untangled cable, the cable creates a lot of noise...

post #13 of 31

the a- series look like the ECCI PR401. do they have the same microphonics problem due to the thick cable?

post #14 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanuka View Post

the a- series look like the ECCI PR401. do they have the same microphonics problem due to the thick cable?

 

Not as bad on PR401 since its cable is smaller and thinner (which makes it easier to wear over-the-ear).

post #15 of 31

Hello ClieOS (and the forum community). Just stumbled upon this forum today. I'm looking for a good IEM since my cheapo broke so I went to a mall and I saw these 'Jays' head/earphones. I was wondering if you could help me choose between these 3 cuz they were on my list of buying a replacement IEM. I really don't understand some of the terms here so I was wondering if you could help me out.

Here are songs I currently use as benchmarks (I should warn you that they might not be your music; merely to let you know the kind of sound I'm looking for):

1. Dark Tranquillity - Zero Distance (Death Metal)

2. Nightwish - Storytime (Power Metal)

3. Insomnium - Weather the Storm (Death Metal)

 

You don't have to recommend Jays if you think the brand isn't that suitable. I'm ok with it as long as the IEM is durable, available in Malaysia and under RM400 and has to have GOOD BASS and VOCALS. Not a fan of the sound of trebles.

 

Thanks a lot in advance.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › [REVIEW] a-JAYS Two, a-JAYS Three and t-JAYS Two: The Budget Invasion