Latest Thread Images

Multi-IEM Review - 352 IEMs compared (Pump Audio Earphones added 04/03/16 p. 1106)
Apr 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM Post #6,661 of 16,931
Apr 20, 2012 at 12:41 PM Post #6,662 of 16,931
 
Quote:
ljokerl said:
It's amazing that you a. remember and b. were able to find that link. I was just dreading having to go looking for that post 
tongue.gif
Click to expand...

 
Now that I have proved that I am stalking this thread far too much and for far too long than I care to admit, can I have the TF10 review?  
wink.gif

 
Apr 20, 2012 at 1:16 PM Post #6,663 of 16,931
GILLY87
Hey you read that wrong, it's only $63 in us funds and they do have them in stock in the U.S.   They ship fron IL and takes like 3 days to get them...NOTHING under $100 can touch them..They are that good..
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 1:34 PM Post #6,664 of 16,931
yes yes yes , do that , it will help to compare the dba-02 and gr07 , triple ba vs dual vs dynamic . i like eu signature if it has retained or not , and hows the bass against ue 700 , cuz ue 700 got some nice bass . turn up the music and i hope she dont mind , cb and sean paul .
 
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 1:38 PM Post #6,665 of 16,931
Hi |joker|! This is probably difficult since the FXT-90's were a loan, but should you remember, how would you compare the mid-range (particularly distorted guitar?), treble, and prat/speed of the JVC's against the CK-10's? To one-up Niyologist's inquiry, what balanced-armature or dynamic in your opinion, would best the JVC's in terms of attack, aggression, and transparency?
 
Thank you!
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM Post #6,666 of 16,931
Apr 20, 2012 at 4:50 PM Post #6,667 of 16,931
vaed said:
Hi |joker|! This is probably difficult since the FXT-90's were a loan, but should you remember, how would you compare the mid-range (particularly distorted guitar?), treble, and prat/speed of the JVC's against the CK-10's? To one-up Niyologist's inquiry, what balanced-armature or dynamic in your opinion, would best the JVC's in terms of attack, aggression, and transparency?

Thank you!
Click to expand...


Regarding the the FXT90, is it better than GR07 for distorted guitars? By this I mean a real aggressive bite to the sound? Or any other IEM in this price range for that matter....EPH100?
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 4:57 PM Post #6,668 of 16,931
 
Quote:
nuckinfutz said:
Regarding the the FXT90, is it better than GR07 for distorted guitars? By this I mean a real aggressive bite to the sound? Or any other IEM in this price range for that matter....EPH100?
Click to expand...

 
Read this post: http://www.head-fi.org/t/563722/jvc-ha-fxt90-appreciation-thread-user-info-buying-guide-reviews-on-page-1#post_7623915 in the appreciation thread, there are many comparisons made to the GR07 for your pleasure. I don't want to comment too much since I haven't heard the GR07, and that I haven't really heard enough headphones to plot an accurate distribution of what would constitute "aggression", but distorted guitars certainly have a bite on these things.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 5:29 PM Post #6,669 of 16,931
 
Quote:
nuckinfutz said:
Regarding the the FXT90, is it better than GR07 for distorted guitars? By this I mean a real aggressive bite to the sound? Or any other IEM in this price range for that matter....EPH100?
Click to expand...

 
Well I have all 3 of thoughs and for me the GR07 and EPH-100 sound better for distorted guitars in rock and metal for instance.  At first I liked the FXT90 but theres just something about them that just doesn't click for me.  They are very capable IEM's just not a sound signature I can really get into.
 
Now both the GR07 and EPH-100 have a similar sound in that they both have a more laid back non-offensive sound signature and both have good detail and excellent separation.
 
All 3 are very good IEM's so it comes down to what signature you want.
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM Post #6,670 of 16,931
I just got my cc51 yesterday. So far, I noticed That on left channel, when the song going to high note or pitch, I hear a bit of echo and sound very annoying. Is the technical term for this is that it to bright? Is this normal for this set of iem? Will it go away with burn in?
 
Apr 20, 2012 at 9:11 PM Post #6,671 of 16,931
 
Quote:
esanthosh said:
 
Now that I have proved that I am stalking this thread far too much and for far too long than I care to admit, can I have the TF10 review?  
wink.gif
Click to expand...

 
Fine, I'll do it after the FitEar MH334 
tongue.gif

 
 
Quote:
vaed said:
Hi |joker|! This is probably difficult since the FXT-90's were a loan, but should you remember, how would you compare the mid-range (particularly distorted guitar?), treble, and prat/speed of the JVC's against the CK-10's? To one-up Niyologist's inquiry, what balanced-armature or dynamic in your opinion, would best the JVC's in terms of attack, aggression, and transparency?
 
Thank you!
Click to expand...

 
The FXT90 is much warmer and thicker than the CK10. I really don't think you can compare the midranges of the two because they are so different but if you like your guitars up front the FXT90 is likely the ticket. The CK10 has slightly hotter treble and nothing beats it for speed from what I've heard. The EX1000 and FX700 are both dynamic-driver upgrades to the FXT90 in some ways. In the armature world, maybe the DBA-02, W3, or j-Phonic K2 SP (not that you can buy one anymore). 
 
 
Quote:
zerocrack said:
I just got my cc51 yesterday. So far, I noticed That on left channel, when the song going to high note or pitch, I hear a bit of echo and sound very annoying. Is the technical term for this is that it to bright? Is this normal for this set of iem? Will it go away with burn in?
Click to expand...

 
 
Sounds like a QC issue if it's consistent across recordings. I'm sure it's something they'll warranty.
 
Apr 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM Post #6,675 of 16,931
Joker, how does EPH-100 timbre compare to FXT90?
 
And both above compared to GR07
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 14 (members: 0, guests: 14)
Back
Top