Quote:
Originally Posted by canbus /img/forum/go_quote.gif
"They sound veilled" is what I have read multiple, multiple, times on the internet. It was not a reference to anything said in this thread. Speaking of 'referencing this thread'. I was hoping that if someone starts bitching about their new hd650's (like me) please remember what I suggested. Dont post links or anything idiotic. I was not suggesting that. I was GUTTED with the HD650's untill they cleared up. Imo they did not sound veiled they sounded barbaric. If someone has lived like a monk to pay for these phones, then the least they can expect is an accurate description of what they sound like out of the box and what they sound like after many hours of burn in time. At first my senns sounded so bad I thought they where fake. Now they sound brilliant. Thats 100+ hours of unnessary stress. Stress which caused the formation of this thread. Why the anger? Well im very much a newbie and this newbies observation is that the only truly good thing about some hi fi products are their marketing teams (nothing I own just kit I have auditioned). Would robbery be to strong a word?
"these speakers are slightly bright"
Translation, factor 30 will not save you.
YOU ARE THE EXPERTS. I came to the EXPERTS, to find out what to look at. Im not a hi fi junkie just a very heavy 'phone user. How the hell am I supposed to audition an imod? Would 'pc world' let me rip apart the packaging of an xmod to audition it? Where can I audition a DV 336i? I went by word of mouth from the EXPERTS. That has been a costly error.
Negative attitude? I bought hd650's+ darkvoice 336i. If I was negative (pissed off), it was because I was going hungry whilst listening to what I thought where crap phones. I guess hunger does that.
I cant be bothered with conflict.
Thanks for your time.
|
Actually, this post cleared up a lot of things in terms of your perspective. Some of what you've said now makes a lot more sense to me and I do see where you're coming from.
While I can definitely see where you would regard "us" (being mostly the frequent posters here at Head-Fi) as the "experts", none of really are. Or at least very few people that I know of (actually, none that I can think of off hand) regard themselves as experts in an overall sense.
Granted, there are a small number of people who have specialized knowledge and experience in selected aspects of what is discussed at Head-Fi, so there are a select few experts who hang out in the DIY forum, or in the amp or cables forums. There are a whole lot more people who know enough to be scary.
In any case, I'm certainly not looking for conflict either. Not that I'm immune to conflict. Yet, I suspect that if you surveyed 100 frequent posters at Head-Fi, the vast majority of them would say that I'm not generally a confrontational person. At the same time, I'll stand up for something that I believe in.
In this case, I may well have misinterpreted your comments such that I got the sense that you felt "cheated" or "misled" (both are my words, not yours) by the advice that you took and relied on in your decision making. That, in turn, seemed to cause a great deal of frustration on your part, and to have created a certain "expectation" that you could rely on such opinions as though they were facts.
From there, all I was really trying to point out is that with audio gear, there is no objective truth. It's all based on subjective opinions which in turns are based on perceptions that can and do differ between individuals. This is also very much affected by the associated gear that people are using, and may be (as you've discovered) affected by break-in as well.
In any case, I hope you'll find something useful from the various responses you've received in this thread. I really didn't intend to become negative and confrontational until I read your post that I reacted to in my last post, for the reasons stated there - some of which may well have been misinterpretations on my part.