Why do people use Windows?
Sep 21, 2009 at 8:50 AM Post #121 of 283
Quote:

I can't stand the OSX UI either, it makes me feel limited and claustrophobic. My mom has used Windows computers for over ten years and is still terrified of them. She messes them up on a regular basis. She's messed up a Mac maybe once. I don't trust her in Windows so to speak. Most users don't try learning what they're doing before they do it in my experience, and therein lies the problem.


I have given up on trying to tell people how it isn't that easy to mess up windows as long as you exercise common practice. Periodic ghosting is what I thought was gonna work, but no, they are just too lazy and unmotivated to bring themselves to learn that little.

Quote:

every driver installed out of the box on my laptop and the drivers get updated through Windows Update. Everything except my sound card was working out of the box on my desktop, even my graphics drivers were the 'real deal' instead of the basic VESA drivers in XP and Vista


I don't trust the windows update's video card driver suggestions, not as much as straight from Ati or Nvidia. On one occasion it managed to mess up my textures. Nothing a quick run of drivercleaner could not fix, just that I wouldn't be using it for something as potenially unstable and volatile as GPU driver. Same goes for getting analog-out to send output thru the wolfson dac on av710; you cannot get that done with just the driver set supplied by windows update. For most everything though, things work well enough. If I am dealing with a non-gaming machine, then I wouldn't have any issues with vga drivers either way.

Quote:

Actually you should check out the latest pwn2own results. Apparently OSX fell in seconds


Thanks for the link, I knew about the security through obscurity thing, but now I have something I can shove in my mac elitists friend's face when he goes "oh, but OSX is secure... "
biggrin.gif


Quote:

Anyway, I guess it is this time of the month again. Mac vs. PC flame war!


Let's get the facts straight here, you were the one that attacked the people 'on the other side' and contributed to what you call a flame war (maybe you just wanted to start one). This is not the only thread I have seen you post something deliberately provocative, but that's fine by me. I hope you are at least getting some kick out of it
smily_headphones1.gif


Quote:

Indeed!
But if Mac OS X do not allow you to perform a certain task then you can use MS Windows or whatever to perform this task. Read the text I replied to as well, then my answer.


So Mac by itself is not perfect. When you need to step outside its boundaries (gaming **cough cough**), it is immensely inferior to PC counterparts while costing up to a few times more. Not everyone likes to game on consoles. Dualbooting is very tedious, I would wager anyone, I mean anyone would prefer a VM for trivial tasks. Why bother with dualbooting when VMs could get everything you would have wanted? On my vista / 7 installations, I am free to run ubuntu / xp in my vbox whenever situation calls for it. Good luck trying to emulate that on your OSX
biggrin.gif
My 7 RTM has an uptime of a few weeks or longer unless I have enough essential updates accumulated, or need to swap out / add hardware. Rebooting is a chore and time consuming, why bother?

Quote:

Windows - when I ran it - needed loads of maintenance. Maybe if you're a student with lots of free time or a Microsoft admin you can devote the time to keeping Windows running. If you're working 70-90 hours a week and trying to maintain a life, scrubbing Windows clean is a monumental waste of time.


Not entirely sure about that, I dont' do much maintainig on my windows 7 box, certainly 1/100th as much time as I needed on my ubuntu just to get the damn tv card / samba share / VLC working right. I must wonder, just what do you do on windows?
redface.gif


Quote:

And don't blame me for not "knowing" enough to handle Windows. I learned to run Linux from knowing nothing about it in 2002 and have mucked with computers for the better part of 30 years. It's the same reason I don'town an unreliable car that needs to be tweaked and repaired every day or two just so I can drive to work.


Sorry about the trouble you been having with windows, I guess they just can't make everyone happy. Lucky me, I never had so much grief with it.

Quote:

If Microsoft wants to overcome the immense ill will of millions, they need to do something extraordinary


For every million that you quote, I am willing to bet there are couple more millions that would be happy with windows. Give them any variant of linux, and I am sure it won't take long for them bitch about it just as much, if not more.
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 9:07 AM Post #122 of 283
That friend of mine is a diehard mac junkie, and we agreed to disagree on topics related to mac vs pc. I acknowledge he likes the mac interface better and vice versa, so all is fine. We still talk and joke about it to find out how we each arrived at our respective positions though, it does not take a flame war to do that.

Anyway, he is currently using the earlier MacBook Pro, and feels it is a bit sluggish for daily use and wishes for an upgrade. As a PC user, I find that hard to believe; why would a core duo fitted computer be insufficient for browsing on the web, doing some office work while listening to music? To be fair, he also sites inability to play HD movies without dropped frames as one of the reasons for upgrade, which is not Mac's or OSX's fault per se. I don't understand why he would wait for a clarkdale based MacBook refresh, when he could have taken that same money and built a very decent desktop and get another lappy a long while ago without suffering all this long.
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 9:07 AM Post #123 of 283
windows is easy, nearly universal adoption, tons of 3d party apps, i like building my own rigs, AND, perhaps most important, it doesn't require you joining a cult, drinking koolaid, and living in steve jobs head ... furthermore that little mac s**t who does all the commercials leads people to believe that macs are some magic pill to one's e-life when the truth is quite the opposite ... a couple friends of mine have macs and even they gripe about woeful interoperability, frequent use of boot camp (which grew more frequent as they became comfortable with it (this was a plus for them actually)), lock ups and crashes, and, of course, high price tag
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 9:09 AM Post #124 of 283
I use computer applications. It just happens that most of the apps I use are readily available on Windows XP.

I try not to interact too much with the OS at all.

OS wars are stooopid discussions.
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 9:15 AM Post #126 of 283
Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Windows - when I ran it - needed loads of maintenance. Maybe if you're a student with lots of free time or a Microsoft admin you can devote the time to keeping Windows running. If you're working 70-90 hours a week and trying to maintain a life, scrubbing Windows clean is a monumental waste of time.


It's called a task scheduler. Use it?

I'd also like to know what you're scrubbing and how often. I'd say a wipe of registry (which takes seconds), spyware (overnight), and a defrag (also overnight) once a month is more than enough in a modern Windows environment (Vista or W7).

Quote:

Which is the same reason I run Linux on the desktop. It simply works, has the applications I need, and can ignore it for months or years while it simply does its job.


Haven't you had dependencies break after an update, or had trouble getting WPA2 to work properly? How about lack of hardware support and shoddy drivers . . . for example any ATI card?

Quote:

Further, considering the hell Microsoft has put me through over the years, they can suck it. And that's being polite. The crashes, freezes and other random crap that has cost me endless productivity and lost hours entirely pisses me off.


I doubt that was directly Microsoft's fault. Are you sure it wasn't a badly made driver, or application? Why is it that Microsoft is to be blamed for code they did not make on a regular basis by people?

Quote:

I do not think I am being unfair. Apple is far from perfect and Linux has its shortcomings. But both pretty much work as they're supposed to and give me very little grief. Microsoft, on the other hand, has given me so much grief that they're not worth considering.


Sure you are. You have yet to prove the OS was directly at fault for any of your grief. You have yet to eliminate other variables from what I've seen. Any time I had a BSOD I could trace it back to something I did, bad software, or a hardware failure.

Quote:

And don't blame me for not "knowing" enough to handle Windows. I learned to run Linux from knowing nothing about it in 2002 and have mucked with computers for the better part of 30 years.


That means you know something about Linux which has nothing to do with Windows. Hence saying you don't know enough about Windows to keep it running may very well be an apt judgment of your knowledge. Also your argument requires me to accept your experience as intelligence or wisdom on the matter. I've seen people, some with degrees for the matter, do things wrong for years. As such I'm not willing to grant you any benefit of a doubt on the matter.

Quote:

It's the same reason I don'town an unreliable car that needs to be tweaked and repaired every day or two just so I can drive to work.


Windows is like a race car using manual transmission that needs oil changes regularly. Mac OSX is like a commuter car you take ten miles to work everyday and that's it.

Both work, but one does have a performance edge surely.

Quote:

If Microsoft wants to overcome the immense ill will of millions, they need to do something extraordinary.


They've done more than enough by developing standards for computer usage that others can merely hope to accomplish. Whether you believe it or not you benefit from them in the market no matter what OS you use.
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM Post #127 of 283
My xp computer hasn't froze, crashed, etc. ever. I keep it on for months at a time. The only time I ever shut it off or restart is for the occasional update, blowing out dust, adding new hardware, etc. BTW, you can schedule antivirus scans, defragmenting, etc.

CPU:Intel E8400 c0 w/ Zalman CNPS9500AT
Motherboard:EP35-DS3R Rev. 2.1
Graphics Card:8800 GT 512MB w/ Thermaltake DuOrb
Memory:Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2 800 Cas4
Hard Drive:4x Seagate 300GB
Optical Drive:2x Samsung SH-S202J DVD-RW
Power Supply:Antec NeoHE 550W
Display:Dell 2005FPW 20.1" S-IPS Panel
Case:Antec P182
Sound Card:X-Fi Platinum (Asus Essence ST soon)
Speakers:Logitech Z-5500 (Taking suggestions)
Headphones:Icemat Audio Siberia ($100-300 replacement soon)
Mouse:Logitech G500/MX Revolution
Mouse pad:Steelseries SP
Keyboard:Logitech UltraX/diNovo Edge
Operating System:WinXP x64/Win7 Pro RTM/Ubuntu 9.04/Mac OSX 10.5.4
Other 1: Scythe Kaze Master Fan Controller
Other 2:Trendnet TEW-643PI Wireless N PCI Adapter
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 10:08 AM Post #128 of 283
... plus ... i betcha couldnt do this as a mac for $1200 ...
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM Post #131 of 283
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikoLayer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I don't trust the windows update's video card driver suggestions, not as much as straight from Ati or Nvidia. On one occasion it managed to mess up my textures. Nothing a quick run of drivercleaner could not fix, just that I wouldn't be using it for something as potenially unstable and volatile as GPU driver. Same goes for getting analog-out to send output thru the wolfson dac on av710; you cannot get that done with just the driver set supplied by windows update. For most everything though, things work well enough. If I am dealing with a non-gaming machine, then I wouldn't have any issues with vga drivers either way.


Agreed on updating drivers through Windows Update. I always manually download and update my drivers, but for the average user it's nice being able to update them right inside Windows.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikoLayer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
So Mac by itself is not perfect. When you need to step outside its boundaries (gaming **cough cough**), it is immensely inferior to PC counterparts while costing up to a few times more. Not everyone likes to game on consoles. Dualbooting is very tedious, I would wager anyone, I mean anyone would prefer a VM for trivial tasks. Why bother with dualbooting when VMs could get everything you would have wanted? On my vista / 7 installations, I am free to run ubuntu / xp in my vbox whenever situation calls for it. Good luck trying to emulate that on your OSX
biggrin.gif
My 7 RTM has an uptime of a few weeks or longer unless I have enough essential updates accumulated, or need to swap out / add hardware. Rebooting is a chore and time consuming, why bother?



Oh man do I love Sun VirtualBox. I don't actually use it to run any applications from other operating systems, I have an XP virtual machine to run "ancient" games like Alpha Centauri. (which doesn't have windowed mode either, but VirtualBox does!)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shike /img/forum/go_quote.gif
It's called a task scheduler. Use it?

I'd also like to know what you're scrubbing and how often. I'd say a wipe of registry (which takes seconds), spyware (overnight), and a defrag (also overnight) once a month is more than enough in a modern Windows environment (Vista or W7).



And the nice thing is that defragging happens automatically in Vista/7 during pretty obscure hours, like 3am *looks at the clock* err... I should be going to bed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iriverdude /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Macs seem like throwaway devices? Especially the imac. It wouldn't be too bad if the motherboard was accessible and user replaceable. I re-use bits in my computers for newer machines.


You mean the "logic board" don't you?
wink.gif
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM Post #132 of 283
Quote:

Originally Posted by iriverdude /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Macs seem like throwaway devices? Especially the imac. It wouldn't be too bad if the motherboard was accessible and user replaceable. I re-use bits in my computers for newer machines.


In my humble observation, I don't think too many people buy iMacs these days; rather, it is MacBooks that are becoming more and more prevalent. They stand relatively a better chance against non-macs than their desktop siblings do since

1. it is nearly impossible to build your own laptop even if isn't a mac, and when you do it isn't all that cheaper or practical

2. most people don't game on laptops or expect to do other serious tasks. macs might be just good enough for that

3. people tend to care more about looks with laptops as they are exposed to the rest of the world, and the whole mac affair seems to be a fashionable thing to do these days. There are other manufacturers on the PC side that charge you more for 'better' looks (e.g. sony)

Since I am one of those that don't follow the whole i-pod fad either, so you can count me out
smily_headphones1.gif
I am merely stating that with laptops, they are a tad bit more competitive. Still, I don't like the OS and the hardware is waaay overpriced.
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM Post #133 of 283
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikoLayer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
3. people tend to care more about looks with laptops as they are exposed to the rest of the world, and the whole mac affair seems to be a fashionable thing to do these days. There are other manufacturers on the PC side that charge you more for 'better' looks (e.g. sony)


And then they'll be sorry when everyone else has the exact same laptop and they have to buy something different to look cool, edgy, and different again.
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 10:35 AM Post #134 of 283
Quote:

Originally Posted by somestranger26 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And then they'll be sorry when everyone else has the exact same laptop and they have to buy something different to look cool, edgy, and different again.


well, I guess the idea is to be different from us unenlightened PC fools, not amongst themselves
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Sep 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM Post #135 of 283
From what i see, people use windows because:

- Windows is pre-installed on most of PCs in the market
- PC system can be built/customized easily
- Much more applications for this OS than Mac or Linux

I tried many OS such as OS X, Linux Redhat (the first day it comes out) and Ubuntu. Honestly i see no reason to leave windows for what i do: games, music, overclocking, office work... the most important thing for me is that i can find every application i need in windows platform but not with Mac or Linux. Driver for high end hardwares is another big problem for Linux (Mac? oh no
smily_headphones1.gif
)

I'm using Windows 7 Ultimate and for me it is the best OS now in term of compatiblity, stability and i simply love its interface.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top