Audio-Omega
Headphoneus Supremus
The Expendables 2 - 4.5/10
Rate The Last Movie You Watched
- Thread starter Agent Kang
- Start date
midoo1990
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Posts
- 2,035
- Likes
- 23
Irreversible 0.5/10 .
Safe House. 8.5/10 . not a fan of Denzel in general,but i enjoyed that movie in most aspects.well excuted.
Safe House. 8.5/10 . not a fan of Denzel in general,but i enjoyed that movie in most aspects.well excuted.
Focker
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
lol, I loved seeing him in this film...the guy is a true showman! I have always been interested in "fish out of water" stories, so I got a kick out of this one. I thought J.Depp was great, as was Chloe Grace Moretz. Critics didn't seem to care for this film, but I thought it was fun.
lol, I loved seeing him in this film...the guy is a true showman! I have always been interested in "fish out of water" stories, so I got a kick out of this one. I thought J.Depp was great, as was Chloe Grace Moretz. Critics didn't seem to care for this film, but I thought it was fun.
Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
Me too! I wonder why such a low score?
I had to watch it a couple times to really get into it. I actually saw it when it came out on DVD for the first time and no one knew a thing about it. There was no reviews on line or anything. It made it a little of a mystery, which I liked.
Some folks I would guess would feel like the director was rude in his cinematic style. Some folks just get sea-sick from the handheld work in the flick.
It took me the longest time to get used to the style, then I loved it.
Still though .5?
I had to watch it a couple times to really get into it. I actually saw it when it came out on DVD for the first time and no one knew a thing about it. There was no reviews on line or anything. It made it a little of a mystery, which I liked.
Some folks I would guess would feel like the director was rude in his cinematic style. Some folks just get sea-sick from the handheld work in the flick.
It took me the longest time to get used to the style, then I loved it.
Still though .5?
paradoxper
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
I'm going to guess the cinematography and content of the film was too much. I could understand why it might not be liked.
Have you seen Enter The Void? I absolutely love the direction of that film, pretty cool concept as well.
I had to watch it a couple times to really get into it. I actually saw it when it came out on DVD for the first time and no one knew a thing about it. There was no reviews on line or anything. It made it a little of a mystery, which I liked.
Some folks I would guess would feel like the director was rude in his cinematic style. Some folks just get sea-sick from the handheld work in the flick.
It took me the longest time to get used to the style, then I loved it.
Still though .5?
I'm going to guess the cinematography and content of the film was too much. I could understand why it might not be liked.
Have you seen Enter The Void? I absolutely love the direction of that film, pretty cool concept as well.
Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
Enter The Void?
I'll have to get a look out for it!
I'll have to get a look out for it!
tdockweiler
Headphoneus Supremus
Home Alone - 10/10 (seriously)
When this came out I saw this with my friends about 5 times in the theater. I think I was 10 and movie tickets only cost $1.50.
I think i've seen this one at least a hundred times by now and it's still entertaining (and funny).
Every character in it is perfect to me. BTW I wonder why Culkin's acting was so good in this movie but it was so awful in part 2? In part 2 it's as if he was reading a script.
I actually watched this tonight and then immediately watched the commentary all the way through! For the commentary I was kind of working.
Did you know they had an adult stunt double for Kevin when he fell off the shelves in the bedroom? Same size they said. Old Man Marley's stunt double (shown in the movie) was still in high school and played a 75 year old!
All the scenes of Paris are stock footage due to the low budget of only 18 million.
I still remember how this stayed at theaters for nearly an eternity..
When this came out I saw this with my friends about 5 times in the theater. I think I was 10 and movie tickets only cost $1.50.
I think i've seen this one at least a hundred times by now and it's still entertaining (and funny).
Every character in it is perfect to me. BTW I wonder why Culkin's acting was so good in this movie but it was so awful in part 2? In part 2 it's as if he was reading a script.
I actually watched this tonight and then immediately watched the commentary all the way through! For the commentary I was kind of working.
Did you know they had an adult stunt double for Kevin when he fell off the shelves in the bedroom? Same size they said. Old Man Marley's stunt double (shown in the movie) was still in high school and played a 75 year old!
All the scenes of Paris are stock footage due to the low budget of only 18 million.
I still remember how this stayed at theaters for nearly an eternity..
Focker
Headphoneus Supremus
Regretfully, this one was a disappointment. I loved the music, and about half the film was great, but it got watered down by a bunch of sappy crap. It could have truly been great if they would have stuck with the rock stuff and avoided the teenie bopper romance. If I never have to hear Alec Baldwin try to sing again, I'll be fine with that. Tom Cruise was much better than I expected. But even though Julianna Hough is a cutie, I really got tired of hearing her sing like every song. Once Mary J. Blige hit the screen (in a relatively small part) you got to hear what real female vocals sound like. Anyway, loved taking a trip back through some of the best 80s music and I'm glad I saw it....but overall it missed the mark.
I give it a 6.2/10
I give it a 6.2/10
oqvist
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Posts
- 8,150
- Likes
- 308
Quote:
It´s good too but not quite as good as Irreversible. Only reason I can see people not enjoying it is being to much. But it´s beatifully filmed and feel quite original. I didn´t feel one scene was out of place or anything.
Speaking about the Void must recommend Touching the Void as well. Serious woah movie for me.
midoo1990
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Posts
- 2,035
- Likes
- 23
Quote:
i dont like this type of movies in general,Where there are alot of nude scenes and rough sex.it disgusts me.
the first 20 minutes of the movie where they track down the guy was just annoying to me.i kept scipping every scene from annoyance of the camera man.the rape scene was waay over the top.10 minutes is just ridiculous. it was vulgar and unnecessarly over the top imo. i was watching the movie with a girlfriend and one of my buddies and no one was fond of what they saw.
yes its basically the most important scene of the movie,but i thought it was overdone for the average viewer especially in a very delicate subject like this where most of us,atleast me can get emotionally affected especially since i have sisters...
i wasnt impressed with the 10-15 minutes the lovers spent naked as well.again overdone imo.
The end was ridiculous and i thought the producer forced his opinion when he wrote"Time Ruins everything".
Overall,unnecessary movie to watch just like that serbian crap.i dont think i will ever watch films of that nature again.
OTOH:
The Expandables 2: 5/10. It was Ok despite the amazingly terrible act of Van Dam.
Dark Shadows: 9/10 .I never thought i would enjoy that movie,but it was one of the best ive seen this year.
i dont like this type of movies in general,Where there are alot of nude scenes and rough sex.it disgusts me.
the first 20 minutes of the movie where they track down the guy was just annoying to me.i kept scipping every scene from annoyance of the camera man.the rape scene was waay over the top.10 minutes is just ridiculous. it was vulgar and unnecessarly over the top imo. i was watching the movie with a girlfriend and one of my buddies and no one was fond of what they saw.
yes its basically the most important scene of the movie,but i thought it was overdone for the average viewer especially in a very delicate subject like this where most of us,atleast me can get emotionally affected especially since i have sisters...
i wasnt impressed with the 10-15 minutes the lovers spent naked as well.again overdone imo.
The end was ridiculous and i thought the producer forced his opinion when he wrote"Time Ruins everything".
Overall,unnecessary movie to watch just like that serbian crap.i dont think i will ever watch films of that nature again.
OTOH:
The Expandables 2: 5/10. It was Ok despite the amazingly terrible act of Van Dam.
Dark Shadows: 9/10 .I never thought i would enjoy that movie,but it was one of the best ive seen this year.
5aces
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2009
- Posts
- 769
- Likes
- 32
Mostly Van Damme's stuff is borderline unwatchable for me but this one,6 Bullets,makes the leap to good or surprisingly good.
You know what your getting going in,so on that basis it is a worthwhile action/thriller,with some degree of depth.
Decent effort and worth a look if you like this genre.
Daanvand
Head-Fier
Safe 5.5 out of 10
A decent action movie, to me the story was very bad (even for a action movie
)
A decent action movie, to me the story was very bad (even for a action movie
)
Users who are viewing this thread
