Has anyone here heard significant improvements by throwing more expensive/powerful solid-state amplifiers at the HD650? I used it with a Fiio E10K (High Gain), O2, Schiit Magni 2, Violectric HPA V90 and JDS Labs The Element. Changes were extremely subtle, almost non-existant.
What really appears to bring the very, very best out of the HD650 is an amplifier w/ a damping factor of 50 +. In my case I use the HD650 exclusively w/ my vintage Kenwood KA-8300 integrated amplifier (1976) & I'll tell you, with the right amplifier, as I believe my vintage amp to be, the HD650 is as good as just about any headphone on the market including orthos. I've owned & listened to the following headphones over the years : the HD600 (like that one also), HD598, HD700, HD800, HD800 S, Beyer T1 Gen.1 & Gen.2, DT990/ 600ohm, AKG K702, K712, K702-65th annies, Grado PS1000e, PS500e, GS1000e & i, GH1, SRS325e, RS1i, & e, LCD 2 rev.2, Shure SRH1540, SRH940 & a few more mid-high end which I can't recall & based on my personal taste & based on the "perfect" amplification for them : the HD650 is my personal favourite headphone amongst all of those headphones I've listed.
One important point which at times seems to be forgotten about these headphones is that for a number of years, the HD650 was Sennheiser's flagship headphone. Grant you, that was a few years ago but that doesn't necessarily mean that headphones with newer technology are much better or simply better than the HD650. Price isn't always a true indicator either.
A former member of Head-fi who really knows his stuff put it best when it comes to the HD650 (copy & paste from "a part" of what he wrote on another Internet audiophile site, 3 years ago ) :
Quote : First off, the HD-650 is not a mid-ranged headphone. It was Sennheiser's flagship for years and is still a better headphone than quite a few in the $1,000-$3,000 range. Yes. Seriously.
For those here who don't know me, I usually run the setup in my flair. However, I also have the AKG K-1000, Stax Omega II Mk. 1, Grado HP-2, and a dozen other headphones. I have owned the HD-650, HD-600, DT880, K-701, K-501, and a bunch others. I've been to several large meets and have listened to pretty much everything on the market. Yes, even the Orpheus. My other amp is a Moth Si2A3 and I'm bringing a Barbour Brute Force and Cuiffoli SESS (5842) online pretty quick, followed by a Pete Millett SRPP ECC99 in the grounded cathode configuration. I like speakers, too, and run ProAc Response 2.5 clones I built and Quad ESL-63s.
So when I say that the HD-650 is a high end headphone, I mean it. It's a great headphone and a tremendous value considering that some of the expensive headphones are just ordinary headphones tarted up with aluminum and leather and a really big price tag.
The HD-650 is picky about amplification. This is where the veil myth comes from. The HD-650 is not veiled; amplifiers are veiled. Use a good one and it can sound almost as quick and transparent as an electrostat."
My favourite part of what he wrote & that I happen to agree with is the following :
"The HD650 is picky about amplification. This is where the VEIL MYTH comes from. The HD650 is NOT VEILED; AMPLIFIERS ARE VEILED. Use a good one and it can sound almost as quick and transparent as an electrostat."
I fully agree with this opinion because I'm experiencing it now with the proper amping. This headphone is an exceptional piece of audio technology.