jamont
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2002
- Posts
- 673
- Likes
- 10
I've got the heatsinks mounted and I'm setting the bias now. I'm wondering about the opamp bias measurement, shouldn't we be measuring the voltage across R5 rather than R7?
I'm wondering about the opamp bias measurement, shouldn't we be measuring the voltage across R5 rather than R7? |
Originally Posted by morsel Yes, use R5. You just found a typo in amb's documentation. |
Originally Posted by jamont Here's the board on the desktop, coming to thermal equlibrium for the final bias checks: Next step will be to hook up temporary input/output jacks for testing. Eventually it will wind up in a custom Pars-metal case (I hope), but that's a ways off. |
Originally Posted by Magsy Ohh I'm jealous, hope my board has arrived by the time I get home |
Originally Posted by amb 1.6mV DC offset is very low and there is no need to worry about it. Short of swapping opamps there is really nothing you could do to reduce it further. As you state your amp is already a superb performer. If for some reason you want to make the square wave even more "square" in the ultrasonics, see the notes on the my parts list web page about further optimizing the value of the L and R channels' compensation caps based on the opamp you're using and the voltage gain. |
Originally Posted by n_maher jamont, And idea what the total parts cost was? I know that there are a bunch of us waiting to see how much this is going to hurt. Thx, Nate |
Originally Posted by n_maher (excel spreadsheet) PM me if you're up for the task, also it'd make a good starting point for someone looking to compare configurations and costs and I'm happy to give it to whoever wants it. |