The AK100ii is a DAP I've had my eye on for quite some time. At first glance, it's obvious that it's a premium piece of kit, with it's clean efficient lines, quality touch screen, minimal physical interruptions, and compact size. Reading up on it's specs and the fact that it keeps (and improves) on it's previous iteration leads one to believe that for the asking price, this should be a one stop product, where a bunch of tweaking, additional cables, outboard DACs or amps shouldn't be necessary.
And ya know what? It lives up to the hype.
The Hits
The Misses
My Thoughts
To give you an idea of where I'm coming from, my head-fi DAP history has included a plethora of iPods, a sample of Sansas, a cache of Colorflies, a basket of iBassos, and a few Fiios. Some like the iPods, C3, and DX50 were used with additional amps & DACs, while the X3, X5, and DX90, have been standalones.
For a while, the X5 was my go to as it checked off just about everything on my list. After all, most of my music is redbook quality, my main headphones are very easy to drive and I have no desire to have to carry a giant stack of gear around. Portable audio should be portable after all!
Sound
The X5 never left me feeling like I was missing much on the sound end of things, but when a nice deal on a secondhand AK100ii came up, I pulled the trigger. Figured if for whatever reason, I didn't like it, I'd be able to move it along quickly. After giving it the full run-through with my RS1, GH1, and 1+2 however, there's no doubt in my mind that the X5 has been usurped.
Starting from the bottom, the bass is truly and completely audiophile quality. There's no bloat, no over-the-top sub-bass, and no Earth-shattering mid-bass lift (unless they're already in the recording). What I'm hearing is bass that is incredibly textured, articulate, fast, and dynamic. When called for, it can certainly bring the rumble, but that's only when I'm listening to hip hop or EDM which have that sound in the recording. The AK has made me realize that the X5's low end was a little warmer than I realized, perhaps to strike a happy medium between the budding audiophile and average consumer.
In a word, the midrange is... neutral. I'm definitely a mid-centric listener. My entire desktop rig is designed around the RS1's incredible midrange. And while I loved the thick and lush vocals and crunchy guitars that the X5 gave me, going to the AK has shown me that I was losing out quite a bit on texture and depth. The 100ii doesn't just rush voices to the front of the mix. They stay a little further back so they sound more cohesive with the rest of the track, rather than isolated to give them the spotlight. I'll admit sometimes I miss the warmth that the X5 lent to Norah Jones and John Mayer, but I think what I've gained in my upgrade is easing my suffering
Treble. Clean, airy, textured, and sometimes, a touch too clean. If there's one sonic characteristic about the AK that gave me pause when I first received it, it was the upper end. It's incredibly uncolored and detailed. A clear step up from the X5 and the DX90. However, every once in a while the Grados and the Tralucent would get a little abrasive on abundant cymbal crashes or peaky female vocals. I added just a bit of EQ and rolled some foam tips onto my IEM's and now we're good to go. Now bear in mind, I'm a little treble sensitive, so fear not, I'm not saying that this headphone is nails-on-a-chalkboard screechy at all. It's overall presentation is very clean and neutral. It's gonna give you what's on the recording. If you've got treble-happy headphones, they're not going to be tamed. And if you've got warmer cans, the extra clarity on the upper end may be a nice synergy for you! YMMV.
With regards to soundstage/separation/depth/etc. the AK is the best I've heard in a portable solution. This is where I feel like DAP's really separate themselves and the AK shows that it's clearly a force to be reckoned with. Because of that ultra-clean treble, instrument separation is excellent; leaps and bounds ahead of anything I've heard from Fiio or iBasso. Soundstage width is only a little above average, but depth is quite good! The 100ii really shows off how capable the 1+2 is in this regard.
Function
I don't care to spend too much time in this section because frankly I don't need to. I read a post recently about how a company choosing to employ the computer power of something of this caliber should make the UI almost cell-phone like and I agree... partially. If you're trying to market a premium product, IMHO premium sound is only half the battle. A premium UI is the other half. Luckily, the Android-based UI that AK has developed is very straightforward and easy to use. Granted there have been several firmware updates and as far as I know, they are still continuing to improve, but mine is running 1.25 and I don't feel like anything is missing. Menus are intuitive, controls are easy, there is minimal lag, and I've yet to experience a freeze or crash. When I rolled with the X5 and the DX90, I could navigate well enough, but I definitely felt like the UI was an afterthought.
The only real qualm I have with this player is the file transfer protocol for Mac users. You have to download an app called Android File Transfer and quite frankly, it sucks. It's inconsistent. It's slow. It often hangs up. And it's incredibly limited in it's capabilities. Makes a new DAP owner a little bummed that he's got to try half a dozen times just to get his music on his player! Would love to see this little feature fixed either on AK or Android's end.
I should also mention that the 'extra' features that AK chose to include arewell-done EDIT: ok and appreciated. These include wi-fi capability for streaming, Bluetooth for wireless play, and USB DAC functionality that works very smoothly. The only one I really wanted was the USB DAC, but now that I have the others, I'm certainly feeling like I got more of my money's worth.
EDIT: Went back to further confirm these and didn't have a lot of success. They worked, but were a little inconsistent. Luckily for me, I don't use either of those functions very often.
Conclusion
In summary, the AK100ii, a.k.a. The Gatekeeper (for the land of portable high resolution listening) is a very well-made and designed product that anyone (that's ready to pony up for it's asking price) should consider. Now that it's been out for a while, firmware is very solid, and finding one on the used market makes it even more affordable.
If you want neutral, clean sound with a slew of extra capabilities, then the Astell & Kern 100ii should be on your short list of players!
And ya know what? It lives up to the hype.
The Hits
- Support for every lossless format under the Sun
- USB DAC capability
- Wi-fi and Bluetooth capabilities
- Smoothest, most natural UI I've encountered
The Misses
- Physical button layout
- FILE TRANSFER FOR MAC USERS
My Thoughts
To give you an idea of where I'm coming from, my head-fi DAP history has included a plethora of iPods, a sample of Sansas, a cache of Colorflies, a basket of iBassos, and a few Fiios. Some like the iPods, C3, and DX50 were used with additional amps & DACs, while the X3, X5, and DX90, have been standalones.
For a while, the X5 was my go to as it checked off just about everything on my list. After all, most of my music is redbook quality, my main headphones are very easy to drive and I have no desire to have to carry a giant stack of gear around. Portable audio should be portable after all!
Sound
The X5 never left me feeling like I was missing much on the sound end of things, but when a nice deal on a secondhand AK100ii came up, I pulled the trigger. Figured if for whatever reason, I didn't like it, I'd be able to move it along quickly. After giving it the full run-through with my RS1, GH1, and 1+2 however, there's no doubt in my mind that the X5 has been usurped.
Starting from the bottom, the bass is truly and completely audiophile quality. There's no bloat, no over-the-top sub-bass, and no Earth-shattering mid-bass lift (unless they're already in the recording). What I'm hearing is bass that is incredibly textured, articulate, fast, and dynamic. When called for, it can certainly bring the rumble, but that's only when I'm listening to hip hop or EDM which have that sound in the recording. The AK has made me realize that the X5's low end was a little warmer than I realized, perhaps to strike a happy medium between the budding audiophile and average consumer.
In a word, the midrange is... neutral. I'm definitely a mid-centric listener. My entire desktop rig is designed around the RS1's incredible midrange. And while I loved the thick and lush vocals and crunchy guitars that the X5 gave me, going to the AK has shown me that I was losing out quite a bit on texture and depth. The 100ii doesn't just rush voices to the front of the mix. They stay a little further back so they sound more cohesive with the rest of the track, rather than isolated to give them the spotlight. I'll admit sometimes I miss the warmth that the X5 lent to Norah Jones and John Mayer, but I think what I've gained in my upgrade is easing my suffering

Treble. Clean, airy, textured, and sometimes, a touch too clean. If there's one sonic characteristic about the AK that gave me pause when I first received it, it was the upper end. It's incredibly uncolored and detailed. A clear step up from the X5 and the DX90. However, every once in a while the Grados and the Tralucent would get a little abrasive on abundant cymbal crashes or peaky female vocals. I added just a bit of EQ and rolled some foam tips onto my IEM's and now we're good to go. Now bear in mind, I'm a little treble sensitive, so fear not, I'm not saying that this headphone is nails-on-a-chalkboard screechy at all. It's overall presentation is very clean and neutral. It's gonna give you what's on the recording. If you've got treble-happy headphones, they're not going to be tamed. And if you've got warmer cans, the extra clarity on the upper end may be a nice synergy for you! YMMV.
With regards to soundstage/separation/depth/etc. the AK is the best I've heard in a portable solution. This is where I feel like DAP's really separate themselves and the AK shows that it's clearly a force to be reckoned with. Because of that ultra-clean treble, instrument separation is excellent; leaps and bounds ahead of anything I've heard from Fiio or iBasso. Soundstage width is only a little above average, but depth is quite good! The 100ii really shows off how capable the 1+2 is in this regard.
Function
I don't care to spend too much time in this section because frankly I don't need to. I read a post recently about how a company choosing to employ the computer power of something of this caliber should make the UI almost cell-phone like and I agree... partially. If you're trying to market a premium product, IMHO premium sound is only half the battle. A premium UI is the other half. Luckily, the Android-based UI that AK has developed is very straightforward and easy to use. Granted there have been several firmware updates and as far as I know, they are still continuing to improve, but mine is running 1.25 and I don't feel like anything is missing. Menus are intuitive, controls are easy, there is minimal lag, and I've yet to experience a freeze or crash. When I rolled with the X5 and the DX90, I could navigate well enough, but I definitely felt like the UI was an afterthought.
The only real qualm I have with this player is the file transfer protocol for Mac users. You have to download an app called Android File Transfer and quite frankly, it sucks. It's inconsistent. It's slow. It often hangs up. And it's incredibly limited in it's capabilities. Makes a new DAP owner a little bummed that he's got to try half a dozen times just to get his music on his player! Would love to see this little feature fixed either on AK or Android's end.
I should also mention that the 'extra' features that AK chose to include are
EDIT: Went back to further confirm these and didn't have a lot of success. They worked, but were a little inconsistent. Luckily for me, I don't use either of those functions very often.
Conclusion
In summary, the AK100ii, a.k.a. The Gatekeeper (for the land of portable high resolution listening) is a very well-made and designed product that anyone (that's ready to pony up for it's asking price) should consider. Now that it's been out for a while, firmware is very solid, and finding one on the used market makes it even more affordable.
If you want neutral, clean sound with a slew of extra capabilities, then the Astell & Kern 100ii should be on your short list of players!