[kiling92]

outside of the criticism regarding the lack of attention abiut certain details of construction... you can’t really say nothing to ibasso for the sound quality that has created on this dap. It’s like listening "pure water", I’ve never heard a sound so transparent but at the same time enveloping, with a dynamic and a clinical precision, as far as I’m concerned.. the best sound I’ve ever heard.

. purity, control, authoritarian and natural.. so I would describe the sound from this ibasso

 

[kiling92]

I’m asking personally-and I hope also for many other owners-
Please Ibasso team,I think you created a seriously a piece of cake device,the sound is simply perfect.
The only real cons here is to adjust the volume,one step more on the volume knob is enough to made the sound way louder than I expected;update inside the software the ability to use the physical side keys to raise the volumes of the DAC instead of changing songs,IMO in this way would be seriously the perfect dap

 

[jamato8]

I’m asking personally-and I hope also for many other owners-
Please Ibasso team,I think you created a seriously a piece of cake device,the sound is simply perfect.
The only real cons here is to adjust the volume,one step more on the volume knob is enough to made the sound way louder than I expected;update inside the software the ability to use the physical side keys to raise the volumes of the DAC instead of changing songs,IMO in this way would be seriously the perfect dap

Have you tried lowering the digital volume? I find that from 90 to 100, the sound quality does not degrade.

 

[kiling92]

Have you tried lowering the digital volume? I find that from 90 to 100, the sound quality does not degrade.

The digital volume would be the volume dacs right?from 83 to 100
Yes,the problem is that the various songs have different loud,so if I set,example 90 as dacs volume,it will be great for one album,but for other it would be too loud/weak,and the difference from one attenuator and the nex one is very loudly
Hope you understand..you know..my Italian English lol

 

[justanut]

The digital volume would be the volume dacs right?from 83 to 100
Yes,the problem is that the various songs have different loud,so if I set,example 90 as dacs volume,it will be great for one album,but for other it would be too loud/weak,and the difference from one attenuator and the nex one is very loudly
Hope you understand..you know..my Italian English lol

I agree. It is simply not user-friendly to change digital volume from song to song. I too would rather have the side buttons allows me to change digital volume rather than skip tracks, or at least given the choice to choose what it functions as.

Still, even without adjusting digital volume, I can usually find the sweet spot on the volume knob - sometimes it's not just lowering volume but also changing the impedance knob as well. The issue only arises when I'm at the lowest/highest impedance and limited to the volume knob only. Not a deal breaker, and I'll usually just skip the song if it's just simply incompatible haha..

 

[McCheese]

The digital volume would be the volume dacs right?from 83 to 100
Yes,the problem is that the various songs have different loud,so if I set,example 90 as dacs volume,it will be great for one album,but for other it would be too loud/weak,and the difference from one attenuator and the nex one is very loudly
Hope you understand..you know..my Italian English lol

Why not use replaygain or a similar feature?

 

[kiling92]

Why not use replaygain or a similar feature?

Because IMO the best way to listen the 320 is trough mango os,the black background,the heavier sound and stronger dynamic makes mango os the winner,hands down.
Unfortunately is not possible to customize it