Good luck on lowering the voltage by using NJM7815, which hopefully will not affect other components that may require +18V. There must be a reason why 18V regulators were used.
Assuming you also replace NJM7918 to NJM7915 as well for -15V.
Hi again,
Looks like I did it after all.

| 
|
| |

| 
|
| |
 | 
|
NJM7915 | NJM7815 |
I was actually able to get rid of existing JRC7818/7918 by removing all the 12 screws from both lateral black aluminum heat-sinks from power transistors, then with a small clipper/cutter I cut, one by one, all the legs for each power regulator. The new NJM7815/7915 were placed above by carrefull soldering (legs were also carefully cut to accommodate with heat-sink holes, of course). I choose NJM manufacturer because they say noise from 10-100KHz would be 90uV/170uV RMS for 7815/7915 regulators, quite a decent value I'd say; bought them from PROFUSION UK, authorized JRC/NJM/MUSES dealer.
First thing I noticed was a lower noise than original LME49860, which is quite an improved I'd say, because with max. gain of +20dB and sensitive 32 ohms headphones we all know that there is some noise out there, especially when volume is fully max.
Noise estimation was done by comparing left channel with right channel with AKG K550 headphones and my own ears. Right channel had installed the default LME49860 op-amp and left channel had installed the below op-amps, in order of background noise estimated by my own ears:
- BURSON V5-dual: about 30-40% lower noise than original LME49860
- MUSES8920: about 25% lower noise than LME49860
- LM4562: about the same noise
- AD8599: about 3 times the noise of LME49860 (have no idea why, I thought this op-amp is low-noise, based on it's datasheet).
Headphones used for these tests: AKG K701 (used for scene presentation and layering), BEYERS DT880/600 (used for details, saxophone and women voices) and AKG K550 (used to get background noise and overall musicality).
CONCLUSION: I perceived a very good sound presentation from BURSON V5-D solid state op-amps and I can strongly recommend them for serious DIY-ers. I very much liked women voices and instrument separation, so I'm going to keep the BURSONs inside my HPA-3B for awhile and I hope I'll have the time to do some more tests and reviews.
Please keep in mind that besides replacing both power regulators you also need to remove both DIP8 sockets and to solder V5s directly onto the PCB, because HPA-3B case can't be perfectly closed otherwise; BURSON V5s are about 2mm taller than HPA-3B can support!
PROS:
- BURSON V5-D are definitely having a lower noise than original HPA-3B's op-amps, so great job BURSON! These are definitely the lowest noise op-amps I ever tested.
- I liked women voices and instrument separation a lot.
- Cymbals sound a bit more clean and natural with V5s.
NEUTRALS:
- Details are about the same as LME49860, with just a slight advantage for V5s (BURSON V5 did a great job in revealing more details and clarity with my Objective2 amplifier: http://www.head-fi.org/t/616331/o2-amp-odac/4965#post_12382477).
- Sound-scene is about the same as original op-amp, but I'll test this again the next days and get back to you.
CONS:
- Need to replace power regulators for decreasing the voltage from +/-18V to +/-15V, otherwise lifetime of V5s will decrease.
- Height is 2 mm more than it should be to perfectly fit inside HPA-3B, so you'll need to remove the DIP-8 sockets and solder V5s directly onto motherboards to fit the case
- A bit pricey (about 25% of the price of Matrix HPA-3B).
Note: Many thanks to BURSON for providing these solid-state op-amps for this test!
Will get back here when I'll have the time to compare more op-amps and more songs,
Raul.