daltonlanny
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2007
- Posts
- 1,629
- Likes
- 209
I preferred the HD 650 as well.
Better bass extension, smoother upper mids, more organic sounding.
I always found the 600 thinner, brighter, and a touch grainy in the upper mids/highs compared to the 650.
The subbass was also alittle weaker on the 600's.
I also actually felt the 650's had a tad more resolution and a slightly wider soundstage.
On the other hand, the 600's maybe had a touch more treble extension, or maybe it was more treble energy?.
But still, in all honesty, they really don't sound that much different, unlike the Hifiman HE-500 vs HE-6, or Beyer DT880 vs DT990, for example.
As always though, YMMV.
Better bass extension, smoother upper mids, more organic sounding.
I always found the 600 thinner, brighter, and a touch grainy in the upper mids/highs compared to the 650.
The subbass was also alittle weaker on the 600's.
I also actually felt the 650's had a tad more resolution and a slightly wider soundstage.
On the other hand, the 600's maybe had a touch more treble extension, or maybe it was more treble energy?.
But still, in all honesty, they really don't sound that much different, unlike the Hifiman HE-500 vs HE-6, or Beyer DT880 vs DT990, for example.
As always though, YMMV.