sodesuka
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
- Posts
- 821
- Likes
- 259
It's ALIVE 
http://penonaudio.com/DUNU-DN-2000J
Bit torn between this and R2Pro.

http://penonaudio.com/DUNU-DN-2000J
Bit torn between this and R2Pro.
It's ALIVE
http://penonaudio.com/DUNU-DN-2000J
Bit torn between this and R2Pro.
A DUNU DN-2000J/AKG K3003 comparison would be highly interesting!
It's ALIVE![]()
http://penonaudio.com/DUNU-DN-2000J
Bit torn between this and R2Pro.
DUNU DN-2000J, shot on Canon EOS 6D with EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
Single gridded reflector shooting into medium-sized white foam core overhead, with white reflector cards.
Impressions (from May 2015)
Synopsis (by @tomscy2000)
The DN-2000J is a classically U-shaped earphone, with a sound signature that sounds most similar to a mixture between the AKG K3003 with Reference filters and High Boost filters, tending toward an analytical, detail-filled, and exacting nature. DUNU has long professed a desire to create an earphone that matches or outperforms the K3003, and has released a couple of well-regarded and affordable hybrid IEMs in the DN-1000 and DN-2000 over the last couple of years.
With the DN-2000J, originally created for the Japanese market as a more peppy and more petite version of the DN-2000, they've managed to create their best hybrid earphone yet, and manages to emulate the essence of its target AKG K3003 while preserving its unique identity and lineage from the DN-2000.
Perhaps owing to its custom-spec TWFK driver, the AKG K3003 manages to take the edge off some of the harshness in the treble region a little better than does the DN-2000J, but the DN-2000J comes close to the K3003 in spite of the price difference. Harshness between 8.5-10 kHz is controlled in the retail version over the prototypes, but can still be grating to treble-sensitive individuals, especially with silicone tips. Due to the slightly less refined nature of the DN-2000J's treble, Comply foam tips such as the included Ts-500 are recommended for long-term listening. However, as individual preferences vary, users will need to experiment between different tips to find their most preferred sonic experience.
The DN-2000J possesses very slightly more warmth but yet is very slightly less forward in presentation for the midrange than is the K3003. The two are remarkably similar in this area, however, and possess a similar degree of forward projection for vocals. Thus, potential buyers should be aware that the DN-2000J is not an especially intimate IEM, but is rather neutrally-positioned in sound space --- neither forward nor overtly laid-back. Its U-shaped nature does implicitly mean that the bass and treble will ever so slightly sit ever so proud of the midrange, making the DN-2000J most suitable for low-volume, Fletcher-Munson compensated listening.
In terms of bass performance, while there is some natural bass roll-off, the DN-2000J possesses some of the most capable, naturally-textured, yet extremely well-controlled bass response around. Apropos this writer's opinion, the DN-2000J's bass performance is top-tier amongst universal IEMs, able to go toe-to-toe with products like the Shure SE846, Sony XBA-Z5, and others --- and managing to outstrip its role model, the K3003, in performance.
With this kind of performance, the DN-2000J is a clear winner at $349 USD --- it improves on the performance of its predecessor the DN-2000 (itself a well-regarded IEM), and is of the top tier for sound quality in universal IEMs. Its weaknesses are predicated largely upon its reliance on the polarizing TWFK driver for the mids and highs, as well as its general sound signature tending toward the analytical. Individuals looking for this type of sound, however, will be delighted by the DN-2000J. DUNU deserves a resounding round of applause for a job well done.
I've revamped the OP to reflect current understanding of the DN-2000J, added an impressions/review list for the write-ups that will be pouring in over the next few weeks, and have done my own synopsis of the DN-2000J. My lengthy review with measurements analyses will be published in CYMBACAVUM, but the current review on head-fi will be an evolving write-up, and will reflect the specific attentions of the head-fier.
...I would say that the treble control here is better than one of the highly regarded hybrid out here, the Tralucent 1 Plus 2, as I am currently loaning out my 1Plus2 to other member with the potential of buying, I had a quick A/B between 1P2 and 2000J, and one area that 2000J excelled is the treble control, to my ear, it is better than 1P2, and to note that my 2000J has only done 3-4 hours of usage at that point. Using foam tips certainly help for treble sensitive user, though personally, I found that foam (comply) tips mask some of the details, and alters the signature to be closer to Fidue A83. Silicone is the way to go, as this thing really, seriously outputs the most incredible amount of details - I would be doing some detailed comparison here with it's closest competitor, the A83, in my review...
Made video with first impressions
Nice video cleg - thanks!
And "holy accessories Batman!". Wow - lots of accessories and tuning capabilities.
Made video with first impressions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Yk9Sv5eWjPk