inthere
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2012
- Posts
- 2,588
- Likes
- 1,003
Nighthawk scales very well from iPhone to tube amps of varying sorts.
How are you liking the Nighthawk with Dave?
Nighthawk scales very well from iPhone to tube amps of varying sorts.
How are you liking the Nighthawk with Dave?
hey can anybody tell me: is the nighthawk cable propreitary or can you u use any cable that is 2.5mm dual to 1/4 ? how much is the replacement cable and ear pads from audioquest?
what kind of tube amp is that? Is it otl? I saw nighthawk is low impedance, does that mean it won't be good with otl tube amps but good with non otl tube amps?
what kind of tube amp is that? Is it otl? I saw nighthawk is low impedance, does that mean it won't be good with otl tube amps but good with non otl tube amps?
It has output transformers. Nighthawk is pretty easy to drive. Should be easy with any tube amp.
I finally got to try these at the Best Buy Magnolia store nearby.
Overall, they felt blurrier than the PM-3s I wore into the store (playing both right of my iPhone 6+), but there were these weird moments where certain songs sounded a lot more 'speaker-ish' than my planars. I don't know quite how to explain it.
There's a good attempt at explaining the "blurriness" you are hearing on the website (the Nighthawk has its own microsite if you haven't seen it) - I won't attempt to paraphrase now, but it's the section with the two pictures of the eagle about half way down, from memory. I have both 'phones at the moment and the more I listen to the Nighthawks, the harder it is to go back to the PM3s.
I was just about to post the same and I'm happy to provide paraphrase although I recommend reading the info on the Nighthawk site.
In short, the distortion that most headphones exhibit, combined with deliberate tuning to create specific "sharpness" in the sound will create an artificial sense of clarity / detail in most headphones. This can seem engaging and exciting at first, but ultimately leads to fatigue over longer periods of listening. Skylar's approach to the Nighthawk was to get the lowest achievable distortion and to tune it without added "sharpness" so the result may seem less detailed at first, but if you give it a little time you might actually find that the Nighthawks are actually more transparent and allow you to hear more subtle details in the sound (across all frequencies) because there isn't the 'masking' effect created by enhanced treble and excess distortion.
Of course, we all perceive sound differently, but I'm definitely a fan of Skylar's approach and haven't even thought about buying another headphone since getting the Nighthawk. Now I just need a portable, in-ear Nighthawk (nudge, nudge, wink, wink @SkylarGray
)
+1 to the portable idea - anything in the pipeline, AQ team?
If you are looking for a portable solution with a similar signature (and approach regarding minimising distortion and not emphasising anything artificially) them you might want to check out the Flare Audio R2A or R2Pro iems if you haven't come across them already. I owned a pair of R2As (and my girlfriend still does) and they are very similar in sound signature to the NH, despite being about the size of the eraser on the end of a pencil.
I finally got to try these at the Best Buy Magnolia store nearby.
Overall, they felt blurrier than the PM-3s I wore into the store (playing both right of my iPhone 6+), but there were these weird moments where certain songs sounded a lot more 'speaker-ish' than my planars. I don't know quite how to explain it.