Hifiman HE1000 Planar Dynamic Headphone
Mar 26, 2015 at 12:01 AM Post #2,791 of 14,673
Yeah even if you've got a hundred million bucks, if you know nothing of the industry, a $2999 pair of headphones seems outrageous on first hearing about it.  
 
Same thing would happen if you only ever used point and shoot cameras then found out that some professionals pay $10,000+  just for a lens.  Just depends how deep you want to get into the hobby.
 
Mar 26, 2015 at 1:17 AM Post #2,794 of 14,673
Quote:Up Late
 then I'm not earning enough
wink.gif

FTFY.. 
wink_face.gif

 
Mar 26, 2015 at 3:05 AM Post #2,797 of 14,673
Yeah even if you've got a hundred million bucks, if you know nothing of the industry, a $2999 pair of headphones seems outrageous on first hearing about it.  

Same thing would happen if you only ever used point and shoot cameras then found out that some professionals pay $10,000+  just for a lens.  Just depends how deep you want to get into the hobby.

Well said sir, to the average Joe on the street, 3 grand is ludicrous, especially when most of the people, think Beats Headphones are the best ( that hurt to say).
 
Mar 26, 2015 at 3:18 AM Post #2,798 of 14,673
Quote: 
 
Beats Headphones are the best

 
Oh my god I can't believe you said that!
 
lol sorry I had to 
tongue_smile.gif

 
 
Watched a documentary yesterday on the Bugatti Veyron.  A set of tyres only lasts 6000 miles and cost $17,000 to replace.  That's more than 1x HE-1000 per tyre...
 
...Have I justified the cost yet?  
wink_face.gif

 
Mar 26, 2015 at 3:25 AM Post #2,799 of 14,673
Oh my god I can't believe you said that!

lol sorry I had to :tongue_smile:


Watched a documentary yesterday on the Bugatti Veyron.  A set of tyres only lasts 6000 miles and cost $17,000 to replace.  That's more than 1x HE-1000 per tyre...

...Have I justified the cost yet?  :wink_face:

Lol a fool and his money are easily parted lol :D
 
Mar 26, 2015 at 3:54 AM Post #2,801 of 14,673
The folks that buy a Veyron probably make $17,000 in a day, or an hour. Chump change to them. A world I will never know, that's for sure.

+1 to some, 3 grand is chump change. I once was fixing a flat tire, and a limo stopped and the chauffeur, let out the middle-aged chap and his young son. The kid had never seen a flat tire and asked permission to touch it. For letting his son touch a old flat tire, the chap, whipped out his wallet and offers me 300 dollars. To some like people, it be chump change lol. I am not part of that world. But if Oh I did take the 300 bucks, it was near Christmas and used it for gifts.
 
Mar 26, 2015 at 4:04 AM Post #2,802 of 14,673
So self deprecating, are you not?

Some of the posters calling out polemically against spending money on audio gear in the last few pages of posts are themselves guilty of the same. I am honestly baffled by the irony, unless the posts were written as knives to slit their own author's throats.

The problem with comparing the experience of audio to the experience of whatever else is simply that they are not comparable, nor may they be quantified or reduced and dismissed as merely superficial indulgences, only if such empty pretenses to moral superiority would suggest they are occupying the incorrect forums--that is, these boards dedicated to phenomenological experience of headphone audio--in the first place.

These are not indisputable claims, but they are rather rudimentary. At this point in the game, such prescriptive moralisms fall flat. These are the Summit-fi forums.
 
Mar 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM Post #2,804 of 14,673
I see the discussion has drifted quite a bit to price and income.. Even if they're unaffordable for most, isn't it nice to dream. I'll probably never own a Ferrari, but I still enjoy reading about them, and experiencing them second hand through others. 
 
Technological advancement is always expensive when first introduced, but becomes the affordable standard after many years. But it has to begin somewhere..
 
Mar 26, 2015 at 10:23 AM Post #2,805 of 14,673
While you are all correct about this being summit-fi, at the end of the day, it's just a title at the top of the page that doesn't really mean much... I think a lot of people browsing this thread are HiFiMan fans in general and are used to their more affordable range of high end performers.  They are definitely entitled to their opinions and I can understand the frustration over such a large price jump in their latest release.  I used to share their views and thought headphones costing 2 or 3 thousand dollars (or more) were unnecessarily extravagant products that I would never buy, but a year or two after being introduced to these products, I ended up buying an Abyss.  I was sharing my experience of why my views changed and keeping in mind that I am not necessarily wealthy - I am in an average paying job on wages and took a year of putting money aside in my sock drawer (not literally) to buy something that I really liked and why it was worth it to me.  I thought it might be a valid experience to other people looking at the he1k thinking how stupid hifiman is for doing this and how they'll never buy one, because I was in exactly their position not that long ago.  Cost may be of no object to some people here, but there are a lot of loyal hifiman customers who aren't in that position so talking about cost is relevant to some.


don't own a hifiman but have heard the he6 a few times and was impressed. the announcement of the he1000 interested me and i'm looking forward to giving it a listen sometime but i won't pay $2999 for it or any other can no matter how great it sounds. it's entirely arbitrary but i can't justify paying more than $1500 for a totl can which puts me in he6, hd800, t1, th900, k812, lcd2 territory. beyond that the law of diminishing returns is too compelling for me to ignore.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top