|
Nov 14, 2014 at 11:18 PM Post #13 of 17
jagster2k said:
  Actually what do people think about the ad900x's vs the MA900, seriously considering the MA900's after doing my homework and looking at the specs.  The only downside on the MA900's that I have heard of is that a slightly smaller soundstage than the ad900x's, but better overall specs.
Click to expand...

 
I won't disagree with that thumbnail comparison.  The MA900 is lightly built.  While the 900X is no tank, it will probably take a bit more careless use.  If you're careful with your cans, it's probably not an issue--even a minor one.
 
You might want to read this about the 900X's very similar immediate predecessor:
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/634201/battle-of-the-flagships-58-headphones-compared-update-audeze-lcd-2-revision-2-6-4-13#user_ATHAD900
 
Nov 15, 2014 at 12:14 AM Post #14 of 17
http://www.head-fi.org/t/654161/review-comparison-ath-ad900x-vs-ath-ad1000x-vs-mdr-ma900-its-still-over-900

There's a comparison made by Lachlan. I haven't heard the AT but I love my MA900, like really really love it
 
Nov 15, 2014 at 12:27 AM Post #15 of 17
I wouldn't worry about electronic music and AD900s unless what you listen to is horribly quality and needs a bunch of bass to cover up or distract you from it's mastering flaws.  I had the same concern and it's all a matter of taste IMO if your source material is good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top