keanex
Keeper of The All-New Headphone Buyer's Guide
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
- Posts
- 2,169
- Likes
- 727
http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
Read em up boys.
Read em up boys.
Everyone on this board knows that, it's the rest of head-fi you have to convince. Which is difficult since head-fi themselves are sponsered by HDTracks...
Yeah. Why buying lamborghini when speed limit is 40 mph?
I am a bit aghast at some of the opinions displayed in this thread. On a high resolution system, the benefits of 192K over 96K is clearly audible.
I am a bit aghast at some of the opinions displayed in this thread. On a high resolution system, the benefits of 192K over 96K is clearly audible.
Then it should be trivially easy for someone to demonstrate that under controlled conditions. No one has as far as I'm aware.
se
The controlled condition, I really want is the most resolving audio system known to man. Then, if it still cannot distinguished, and only then, I will side with the rebel alliance here.
Why not just do a little googling and find out what additional benefits higher bitrates and sampling rates offer, then compare that to the thresholds of perception and you'll have your answer.
higher bitrate = lower noise floor
higher sampling rate = extended frequency response
Since 16/44.1 already has a noise floor so low you would have to turn the volume up to hearing damage levels to hear it all, and since it has a frequency response that covers the full spectrum of human hearing, what can you possibly expect to hear?