Hi
@analogsurviver , the tips on the link is the same as the ones that came with the recent package.
I have selected mediums for these 3 eartip types for comparison (all the comparisons are for my ears and
readers should now person to person differences may occur):
1- Comply Tips (CT) (not real comply but quality is fairly good, these are newly designed foam tips that came with B3's. They have 2 round grooves on each side)
2- Senn Double Flanges (SDF)
3- White Silicone Havi's (WSH)
Clarity:
WSH >= SDF > CT
Soundstage:
SDF = WSH > CT
Bass:
WSH > SDF >= CT
Fit/stay On ears:
CT > SDF > WSH
Comfort:
All nearly equal to me.
Isolation:
CT > SDF = WSH
Other thoughts:
Warm sound-signature and smoothing of highs occurred with the new foam tips. They are better sounding than the previous foams that came with Havi B3. Anyone who needs (smoother highs, slightly less clarity) to change the sound-signature of B3 can try the new foams.
WSH is so shallow on the tip bore that every kind of wax can enter on the filter while pushing it in
SDF stayed more secure compared to WSH for my ears.
Clarity and/or presence of highs are head to head for WSH and SDF. I can give slightly edge to WSH. But this part is near the level of undetectable.
Now the measurements of lengths and photos:

CT - SDF - WSH

CT - SDF - WSH

I have 2 calipers at the office (ATM) so you're lucky
Inner diameter of WSH is apprx. 4mm. Outer diameter on the largest part is 12mm.

Inner diameter of SDF is apprx. 6mm. Outer diameter on the largest part is 11mm.
These values for SDF also applies for the CF. But CF bore diameter is closer to 5.5mm rather than 6mm.

Overall length of the WSH and CT is nearly the same while the SDF is shorter.
Check the round groove on the side of the CF!
Tip bore depths after fitting:

SDF measured as (apprx.) 3mm depth.

WSH measured as (apprx.) 2mm depth.

CT measured as (apprx.) 6mm depth.
Largest bore on SDF and CT, shallowest bore depth after fitting is with WSH tip.