Baycode
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
- Posts
- 1,911
- Likes
- 1,612
@Baycode after some extended listening time to O2/ODAC --> Havi B3, I can conclude that the pairing is not up to par with Fiio X3 --> Pico Slim --> B3, GO1000 --> B3 or HDP-R10 --> B3. I tried to give it as much love as I could, but unfortunately the sound was just too sterile for my liking. Midrange and especially vocals suffer because of this.
Regarding what I mentioned about fuzzy imaging, this weird problem still exists, and I don't think it's a fault of the Havi B3 because I ran the exact same tracks on my other current DAPs/DACs/AMPs, but none of them exhibited this character. I also separated the ODAC and O2 and them separately, and I do believe the culprit is in fact the ODAC.
Anyway, I did a bulk of my testing using the R10 as a yardstick of comparison, and I ended up listening to the combination throughout the entire evening and till the wee hours in the evening whilst studying for my exams. I must say, I think it bests both the GO1000 and Pico Slim in synergy with the Havi B3 (I no longer have the GO1000, and unfortunately I did not try the 47Ohm line out to a standalone amp, so I can't answer your query from a few pages back). The HDP-R10 is slightly warm sounding, with amazingly smooth mids, and a rather forward presentation. It is also very accurate, and up there with the O2/ODAC in terms of transparency, clarity and detail. The low frequencies are also accentuated, akin to Pico Slim, but even better IMHO. Sub-bass has rumble, texture, hits hard, and is very well controlled. Mid bass amount is perfect to me as well. The B3 is north of bass neutral as such. I have mentioned countless times what sonic enhancements benefits the Havi B3, and pretty much everything I have typed in this paragraph ticks all the boxes.
I will go out on a limb and say that the R10 --> B3 is synergetically the best pairing of any and everything I have ever owned thus far. There is absolutely zero fault that I can find with how it sounds, and is pretty much the ultimate sound signature that suits my taste. I would not change a single thing about it. I don't find myself missing my SE846s as much as I would expect, and if someone told me that this will have to be my endgame set-up, I would be totally happy with that (for now).
YMMV of course.
WOW! Your feedback is very valuable for the thread @gyx11 ! Thanks a lot!
Since you don't have the GO1000 while doing the comparisons I conclude they are from the memory (for that part)?
I'll be adding this on FP as well.
Now I want to put the equipments in your comparisons in to numbers (as USD):
O2/ODAC (DAC/AMP)= 250+ USD
X3 + PicoSlim (DAP + AMP) = 600 USD
GeekOut 1000 (DAC+AMP) = 299 USD
iBasso R10 (DAP) = 800+ USD
Shure SE846 (IEM) = 1000+ USD
So...:
iBasso R10 + B3 Pro1 = 890 USD
As I start typing I remember that another user, @Tamirci also commented that he reached his iem-nirvana with the iBasso DX90+NX1+B3 Pro1 combo.
At the same time I remember that:
@analogsurviver commented countless times that B3 Pro1 needs best of the sources to reach its limits. And he did compared the situation of the B3 Pro1 with Extrama Amator speaker and amp setups:
Let's remember the Quote of @analogsurviver:
If for any reason you have to decide Havi B3 Pro ( Original Version ) vs some more efficient IEM using a feeble source and no way of adding an amp ASAP - get the efficient one. Mind you, Havi will still probably wow you - but after hearing all it can do with appropriate associated equipment and comparing what of that remains with a feeble source, it is simply too much.
Reminds me of the Extrema Amator loudspeaker; relatively "inexpensive" loudspeaker say 20 or so years ago - ( if 5000 German Marks, an equivalent of say 2500 EUR ( + inflation) can be considered inexpensive ). But IT WAS INEXPENSIVE - compared to amps that could bring that beauty/beast to sing. At LEAST three times more money was needed for the first amp I heard to bring Extremas to life.
Still, there are people with Extremas and underachiever amps - they can not part with the speakers yet can not afford to power them properly. They would have been FAR better off with a bit lesser speakers and an amp within their budget that can handle them properly.
Think - 20 or so years of having to be constantly remindered ( or at least when these combos are being used ) *what if*...
Luckily, here the $ involved are incomparably lower - yet the principle remains the same.
While mentioning these posts ad writing my sentences I don't want to mislead someone to think that "B3 Pro1 can't play music through mid quality sources". No, you can get music from anything else. But the volume level, richness and fullness of the sound, soundstaging capabilities, clarity, freq response gets only better and better with more quality and powerful sources. This character makes the B3 Pro1 a keeper IMO. Because in the future upgrades of your DAP, DAC or AMP there is only one outcome is waiting for you: A better sounding B3 Pro1. Also the music type you listen is important while choosing a player (IMO). From Galaxy S2 (with Voodoo Louder App) I love to listen London Grammar for example... But I feel that the music which needs "punch" doesn't come alive if I don't add an amp.