analogsurviver
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Posts
- 4,480
- Likes
- 373
I listen to a lot of music with strong bass presence and find B3 Pro I satisfying. Merely curious why others don't. I do find it inadequate for electronic / hip-hop music with gobs of sub-bass where a sub-woofer is called for, but not a lot of IEMs can handle that well - at least not any I've owned...
I can understand where are you coming from - it can be perfectly satisfiying the way described.
Havi B3 Pro 1 (old version ) is capable of good bass and sub-bass AND it can take EQ in the bass really well; it will not distort (within reasonable limits ). This is better than majority of IEMs.
However, its bass is not totally neutral - it is a bit shy the lower it goes in frequency. That is why I apply that 3-4 dB boost at 20 Hz, with live music as reference. With recordings one has not been there while making/mastering it, it is hard or downright impossible to say whichever amount of bass/mids/treble is correct ; it is OK to say that Havi B3 Pro 1 ( old version ) is better than other IEMs heard - but that does not make it necesarilly apriori accurate.
With a bit of bass boost, Havi B3 Pro 1 ( old version ), while monitoring live microphone feed, does come very close to the real sound heard live. So much in fact that I no longer crave to get rid of IEMs the second the recording is over, witha a until recently ( Havi... ) LOUD sigh of relief of "coming to the surface from the underwater at long last". Remember, monitoring the recordings means the use of IEMs for hours at an end - a typical live classical concert will have two parts, each at least 45 minutes long. A "studio" recording can span over 6-8 hours, with a break of 15 or so min every 2-3 hours.
It is hard to praise an IEM ( or anything else audio ) even more highly than that.