or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The JVC HA-S680 - S400's and S500's big brother is here!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The JVC HA-S680 - S400's and S500's big brother is here! - Page 44

post #646 of 995

Hey guys, I just wanted to clarify some issues regarding discrepancies which I found when comparing reviews by different posters.

In terms of bass and soundstage, I think the general consensus is the same.

For for the mids, most posters (GeneralPsycho, K.T e.t.c) have said that the mids are very (almost too for some people) pronounced, which makes vocals really take centre stage. Those who have this view general are of the consensus that the S680 is balanced, with great bass and mids, while treble is slightly tamer.

However, there are also a couple (Aillas being one) who have said that the mids are instead recessed, whereas the bass and treble are what shines, which fits the description of a V-shaped sound signature.

May anyone address the differences? I am relatively new to headfi, so perhaps some of my knowledge regarding sound and how to describe it are insufficient.

Cheers!

post #647 of 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by gyx11 View Post

Hey guys, I just wanted to clarify some issues regarding discrepancies which I found when comparing reviews by different posters.


In terms of bass and soundstage, I think the general consensus is the same.


For for the mids, most posters (GeneralPsycho, K.T e.t.c) have said that the mids are very (almost too for some people) pronounced, which makes vocals really take centre stage. Those who have this view general are of the consensus that the S680 is balanced, with great bass and mids, while treble is slightly tamer.


However, there are also a couple (Aillas being one) who have said that the mids are instead recessed, whereas the bass and treble are what shines, which fits the description of a V-shaped sound signature.


May anyone address the differences? I am relatively new to headfi, so perhaps some of my knowledge regarding sound and how to describe it are insufficient.


Cheers!
I suspect your source could be the real differences here. The 680s scale up and or down depending on source.
post #648 of 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreamang View Post

The bass and sub-bass on the JVC ha-s500 is fantastic, tum-tum-tum vibrating the cups " src="http://files.head-fi.org/images/smilies/gs1000.gif" />



On the 680????



And what is the differences between the JVC 660 and 680???



 



Today I listened again to the 660 and I would like to understand what are the differences with the 680 ...


 



Too be honest, after all the reviews and comments here, if you still cant make see what the differences are and manke up your mind you never will without actually buying them
post #649 of 995
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreamang View Post
 

The bass and sub-bass on the JVC ha-s500 is fantastic, tum-tum-tum vibrating the cups :gs1000smile:

On the 680????

And what is the differences between the JVC 660 and 680???

 

Today I listened again to the 660 and I would like to understand what are the differences with the 680 ...

I love S680's bass and sub-bass, no complaints.

 

S660 is crap, S680 is great.

http://www.head-fi.org/t/586909/the-discovery-thread-new-zero-audio-doppios-pg1197-kef-m200-pg835-philips-fidelio-s2-pg-724/16050#post_9937702

post #650 of 995
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by musubi1000 View Post


I suspect your source could be the real differences here. The 680s scale up and or down depending on source.


+1

S680 sounds really great with anything Sabre-based, not so much with Wolfson-based (e.g. FIIO E17).

post #651 of 995
I have fiio e10
post #652 of 995

Thanks for the replies guys.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but should that only change the overall tonality of the sound, and at most a slight change in the sound character? Whereas what we are talking about here are complete opposite ends of the spectrum (recessed vs pronounced, v-shaped vs balanced)

I apologize unreservedly if my queries are ignorant. I really appreciate all the time some of you guys put into this thread, especially you Ben.

post #653 of 995
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreamang View Post

I have fiio e10


Then may be they wouldn't be a great match.

post #654 of 995
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gyx11 View Post
 

Thanks for the replies guys.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but should that only change the overall tonality of the sound, and at most a slight change in the sound character? Whereas what we are talking about here are complete opposite ends of the spectrum (recessed vs pronounced, v-shaped vs balanced)

I apologize unreservedly if my queries are ignorant. I really appreciate all the time some of you guys put into this thread, especially you Ben.

 

 

You are welcome!

Trust me, S680 sounds very different out of ODAC+E12 vs E17.

The vocals are seriously off through E17.

post #655 of 995

Ahh I see. I have not had any experience with different amps (coincidentally mine is the E07K, which uses the same Wolfson chip as the E17) perhaps that was why I did not understand how sound could vary so much.

I will likely be getting a Sabre DAC in the near future as an alternative/complement to my E07K. Perhaps afterwards I will purchase the HA-680 :D

Cheers

post #656 of 995
A lor of problems, any headphone in this range price are good with any amp...
post #657 of 995
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andreamang View Post

A lor of problems, any headphone in this range price are good with any amp...


This is true for any price range. Synergy between a headphone and an amp/DAC is a real thing.

HD800 is notorious for being very picky.

post #658 of 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by gyx11 View Post
 

Hey guys, I just wanted to clarify some issues regarding discrepancies which I found when comparing reviews by different posters.

In terms of bass and soundstage, I think the general consensus is the same.

For for the mids, most posters (GeneralPsycho, K.T e.t.c) have said that the mids are very (almost too for some people) pronounced, which makes vocals really take centre stage. Those who have this view general are of the consensus that the S680 is balanced, with great bass and mids, while treble is slightly tamer.

However, there are also a couple (Aillas being one) who have said that the mids are instead recessed, whereas the bass and treble are what shines, which fits the description of a V-shaped sound signature.

May anyone address the differences? I am relatively new to headfi, so perhaps some of my knowledge regarding sound and how to describe it are insufficient.

Cheers!

 

 

Hi,

 

At the current state of burn-in, which I think is near the end, I would say the S680 presents a fairly balanced frequency response. That's with my FiiO X3 or HTC One V (running Neutron player) through a Schiit Vali amp.

 

At the very beginning, it was indeed the vocal and the midrange that stood out. That range seemed most prominent and noticeable.

 

 After burn-in, however, things seem to have balanced out. So in my case, the frequency response seems more balanced than V shaped.

 

Interestingly, through most of the burn-in process, the bass seemed to be very attenuated. There just wasn't enough of it and it didn't have much impact. So I didn't experience that mega bass that some were reporting.

 

Near the end however, the bass firmed up, but seems to be in line with the rest of the frequency response. Not bumped up compared to everything else

 

Also, before everything came together, there was a point where none of the sound had much impact or conviction. Everything was muddy and indistinct. The vocal/midrange seemed very recessed and distant. Bass and treble were like a murky soup. That went away, but I got very concerned about the health of my phones at around that time.

 

So I'm liking what I'm hearing now, but don't know if this is the final settling point for these carbon nano-tube drivers. But in my experience with these phones, I would say the frequency range is fairly balanced.


Edited by K.T. - 4/1/14 at 10:51am
post #659 of 995

hello guys..can anyone help me to choose between jvc ha-s680 and sony mdr-zx600? i need to choose only and i prefer sound quality than design..

i want to use this with my fiio x3..

please someone help me 

post #660 of 995

Read the comments and I understand that 680 is similar to 660 hahaha

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › The JVC HA-S680 - S400's and S500's big brother is here!