- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Posts
- 713
- Likes
- 165
Hey guys, I just wanted to clarify some issues regarding discrepancies which I found when comparing reviews by different posters.
In terms of bass and soundstage, I think the general consensus is the same.
For for the mids, most posters (GeneralPsycho, K.T e.t.c) have said that the mids are very (almost too for some people) pronounced, which makes vocals really take centre stage. Those who have this view general are of the consensus that the S680 is balanced, with great bass and mids, while treble is slightly tamer.
However, there are also a couple (Aillas being one) who have said that the mids are instead recessed, whereas the bass and treble are what shines, which fits the description of a V-shaped sound signature.
May anyone address the differences? I am relatively new to headfi, so perhaps some of my knowledge regarding sound and how to describe it are insufficient.
Cheers!
In terms of bass and soundstage, I think the general consensus is the same.
For for the mids, most posters (GeneralPsycho, K.T e.t.c) have said that the mids are very (almost too for some people) pronounced, which makes vocals really take centre stage. Those who have this view general are of the consensus that the S680 is balanced, with great bass and mids, while treble is slightly tamer.
However, there are also a couple (Aillas being one) who have said that the mids are instead recessed, whereas the bass and treble are what shines, which fits the description of a V-shaped sound signature.
May anyone address the differences? I am relatively new to headfi, so perhaps some of my knowledge regarding sound and how to describe it are insufficient.
Cheers!