MrSpeakers Alpha Dog Revealed! - The World's First Production 3D-Printed Headphones
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:12 PM Post #3,091 of 9,071
There's always a disparity of opinions when it comes to any major TOTL launch; it's pointless to fight over it. The Abyss even has its avid supporters (though they're sometimes too embarrassed to be forthright about it); the HD800 has vehement detractors. Even when it comes to the factual realm of what a headphone sounds like in the most objective terms possible, there's still room for wild varations.
 
There's no one thing to point to for an explanation of this, but we've covered almost all the contributing factors.
 
Variation in source and amp equipment can vastly effect our opinions of our newest purchases, especially if our equipment isn't electrically well-matched to what we've bought. Somebody driving their AD off a uDAC2/cMoyBB setup is going to have a vastly different experience from somebody with a Bitfrost Uber/Mjolnir combo or somebody who uses a WA7.
 
Somebody whose main cans are open will have completely a different soundstage experience from those who use closed cans almost exclusively.
 
Somebody with a lust for midrange will hear things differently from a basshead, since they're both being more critical about different sonic ranges.
 
And so on and so forth...
 
The "buy it yourself" argument is valid, but it doesn't take into account the fact that the majority of us can't just plop $700 plus shipping down on a whim and hope that we like what arrives. Regardless of Dan's great return policy, that's a lot of cash to have tied up at once. Meets are great, but they're noisy and you tend to only be allowed a cursory listen before passing it onto the next visitor.
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM Post #3,092 of 9,071
Subjective sound is subjective.
 
I am currently debating whether or not to go through with the upgrade when it comes through given how much I like my mad dogs.
They will become my work/home cans, but the I will need a new pair for the commute as I think the cable is going to become an issue lengthwise then as a "portable" (I sit on a train for hours, not exactly walking teh streets.).
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM Post #3,094 of 9,071
   
Hey...easy. While the AD is clearly better, I love the hd650 for more than just relaxing music. 
tongue.gif

+1 
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:34 PM Post #3,095 of 9,071
^Also, doesn't the return policy snab %10 from your refund? Just saying.

I don't know about that; I haven't really paid that much attention because I know for a fact that I won't be returning mine when I finally get around to ordering them.
 
The cost is also a huge issue for those of us who are upgrading, since it's non-returnable in that case.
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:46 PM Post #3,096 of 9,071
Wow!!! sound stage comparable to high quality open HPs huh.  Maybe, I should try the AD on different amps to make this happen.  Cuz at the CA meet, I surely didn't have this impression.  The sound stage was not comparable to my cheap Q701.  But then, what is the definition of sound stage again? 
confused.gif
 
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:48 PM Post #3,097 of 9,071
  Wow!!! sound stage comparable to high quality open HPs huh.  Maybe, I should try the AD on different amps to make this happen.  Cuz at the CA meet, I surely didn't have this impression.  The sound stage was not even close to my cheap Q701.  But then, what is the definition of sound stage again? 
confused.gif

This was my impression also, yes it was a good soundstage, but not an open headphone soundstage by any means.
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:52 PM Post #3,100 of 9,071
  This was my impression also, yes it was a good soundstage, but not an open headphone soundstage by any means.

Hey wolfetan44, wup young man.  Good seeing u posting and sharing your impression about the AD.  I haven't seen BillP in here for a while.
He listened to the AD the most at the meet out of all of us.
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 10:57 PM Post #3,101 of 9,071
 
  This was my impression also, yes it was a good soundstage, but not an open headphone soundstage by any means.

Hey wolfetan44, wup young man.  Good seeing u posting and sharing your impression about the AD.  I haven't seen BillP in here for a while.
He listened to the AD the most at the meet out of all us.

BillP is still around :D
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 11:10 PM Post #3,102 of 9,071
  Wow!!! sound stage comparable to high quality open HPs huh.  Maybe, I should try the AD on different amps to make this happen.  Cuz at the CA meet, I surely didn't have this impression.  The sound stage was not comparable to my cheap Q701.  But then, what is the definition of sound stage again? 
confused.gif
 

I have the K 701s at hand so when the Tour Dog comes around I'll post some impressions. To me, the K 701's soundstage is very wide, but not very deep. I also have the SRS-2170, which has a more natural-sounding soundstage.
 
Oct 17, 2013 at 11:49 PM Post #3,103 of 9,071
Wow!!! sound stage comparable to high quality open HPs huh.  Maybe, I should try the AD on different amps to make this happen.  Cuz at the CA meet, I surely didn't have this impression.  The sound stage was not comparable to my cheap Q701.  But then, what is the definition of sound stage again? :confused:  


This was mostly addressed by Jude when referencing a silent listening environment. Soundstage is probably not an attribute that could be deduced very well, if at all, in noisy room.
 
Oct 18, 2013 at 12:11 AM Post #3,104 of 9,071
  I have the K 701s at hand so when the Tour Dog comes around I'll post some impressions. To me, the K 701's soundstage is very wide, but not very deep. I also have the SRS-2170, which has a more natural-sounding soundstage.

Please do.  At the meet, it was noisy so please let us know your comparison.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top