frix
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Posts
- 726
- Likes
- 522
Since it is a parametric EQ I think it's superior and smoother
than a band based graphic EQ.
than a band based graphic EQ.
I noticed on your profile that you have a Lyr. Care to give a concise impression on how does it compare to WA6 with HD800?
Haha, last night I plugged my HD 800 into my iPhone 4S and listened to some music and it sounded exactly like your description of the Lyr. I remember a couple of years ago when the Lyr was FOTM and everyone was saying how amazing it was.
Funny how that works...
Haha, last night I plugged my HD 800 into my iPhone 4S and listened to some music and it sounded exactly like your description of the Lyr. I remember a couple of years ago when the Lyr was FOTM and everyone was saying how amazing it was.
Funny how that works...
Here are my comparison notes between the 2 (I am in Finance & accounting, i do not do prose, I do to-the-point, concise notes) .
- System used :- Mac Mini running Pure Music (Wave files) - Weiss Int 202 - Audio GD NFB 7 DAC - Amp - HD 800
- Running WA6 with Sophia Princess rectifier & 6FD7 drivers & Lyr with Amperex Orange Globes
- HD 800 sounds lean / flat on the Lyr, Treble has a bit of grain, causes fatigue after some time, not very smooth
- Sound stage is much wider & deeper on WA6, Sounds much more musical &engaging
- Bass is one dimensional on the Lyr, more 3D / textured on the WA6
- Treble extends further, no grain on the WA6
- I can tailor the sound of the WA6 the way i want by using my collection of tubes, you can do the same on the Lyr to some extent but the WA6 gives you 10 times more flexibility for this considering the number of driver & rectifier combinations possible.
I hadn't used the Lyr for some weeks & only plugged it in today for this comparison. In fact as a direct result of this comparison I have now realised that the Lyr is now redundant for me. Seems like will have to sell it
@Lugbug1: you're banned from the game, Vintage gear are too old. Period.