Maxvla
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2002
- Posts
- 8,565
- Likes
- 654
Right...
With regard to your speakers, how do you know they are "flat?" Where are they flat - measured at one foot? 3 feet? listening position? anechoic room?
With regard to the HD 600, neutral sounding is not necessarily the same as flat. Ears are shaped differently, different listening volume results in different perceived frequency response - it's all very subjective.
There's no Analixus mod for the LCD-3, after all.
Don't deny it. You're at the point in the relationship where you know deep down it's not going to work out in the end, but out of loyalty, principle, and perhaps pride, you're simply trying to rationalize why you should keep it. The best thing to do is let go now and live your life with nothing to hold you back and with your true soul mate, the HD800. I'm sure someone else will treat your HE-500 better, with the neglect that will follow soon enough.
damn, you should be a shrink.but no seriously, I can still handle multiple her just fine at this point. I am notorious when it comes to selling stuff I know I won't use no more.
Sell the HE-500 and make some room for the HE-560.
Based on your multiple recommendations for GEC 6AS7G with WA2 & HD 800, I bought one (for my Bttlhd Crack). Wow, Wow, Wow......Thanks.
They are flat when measured at 6.5 feet in an anechoic chamber. Obviously I don't live in an anechoic chamber, but I've listened to the speakers in well-treated rooms and the sound is pretty similar from one room to another - no differences stand out like the treble spike in an un-EQed HD800.
As to subjectivity, I just pulled up a frequency response curve on headphone.com for the HD 800, the HE-500, the LCD-3 and the HD600. The HD800 measures significantly louder than all the others in the 6-10 khz range. I suppose it's possible that my ears are idiosyncratic, or that some aspect of the HD800's geometry and driver placement means that the average listener doesn't perceive that spike, or that the HD800 just has the must accurate portrayal of sound in that range and everyone else messed it up. I don't find any of these explanations convincing, however, and my experience of the other headphones is that they sound more accurate in that range. There's no Analixus mod for the LCD-3, after all.
I think the simplest explanation for the "sonic microscope" characterization of the HD800 is that (i) the soundstage/instrument separation from the ring driver and the driver speed make it easier to identify particular recording details and (ii) the hyped treble makes those details stand out even more. It's easy to view (i) and (ii) as intertwined aspects of the HD800's character, but I view (i) as a virtue and (ii) as a flaw, judged solely from the perspective of accurate sound reproduction. Fortunately for me, (ii) is easy to fix.
Apparently if you register your HD800 at: http://en-uk.sennheiser.com/club-orpheus-registration and bought the HD800 from an authorised UK dealer, Sennheiser sends you an email saying that you have a 10 year extended warranty.
Some UK dealers also mention a 10 year extended warranty:
- http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/sennheiser-hd800-open-back-headphones-hd-800-audiophile-prodid-4538.html
[also mentioned in this post: http://www.head-fi.org/t/654416/sennheiser-hd800-new-product-announcement#post_9235760 ]
- http://www.audiovenue-shop.co.uk/details.asp?id=465&type=Products
Anyone else heard anything about this?
They certainly are a pair of phones that keep surprising with each upgrade. I am finding I don't want to upgrade, but I also want to see how far I can push them, as the saying goes 'welcome to head-fi, sorry for your wallet'.
...
I for one think the 800's picky, sensitive ways as to whats in the chain is great!
It brings me to the edge of my seat when I upgrade or swap out this or that.
You never know how it will agree or disagree to what you've done and I think that is pretty neat.