GeoffW
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2003
- Posts
- 253
- Likes
- 22
Quote:
Logically, this makes complete sense. However, I have spent *hours and days* comparing the sound of the DAC's in a 1990 Yamaha CX-1000 preamp to the CD sound of a new (highly touted) toshiba 3960 dvd player through my CD3000's. I've listened very carefully for details, tonality, bass, etc, and after all that time, the only difference I can discern is that the CX-1000 has a slightly larger soundstage, perhaps due to it's tighter integration of the DAC with super-high quality analog circuitry. They both sound very good. The toshiba has a modern 24-bit Burr-Brown DAC, while the CD-1000 has twin 18-bit DAC's with 8x oversampling and other optimizations. Go figure...
Originally Posted by markl Here's a fun little read on why older CDPs typically suck: http://www.stereophile.com/artdudley.../204listening/ In general, DACs have come a LOOOOOOOOONG way since the early CDPs. |
Logically, this makes complete sense. However, I have spent *hours and days* comparing the sound of the DAC's in a 1990 Yamaha CX-1000 preamp to the CD sound of a new (highly touted) toshiba 3960 dvd player through my CD3000's. I've listened very carefully for details, tonality, bass, etc, and after all that time, the only difference I can discern is that the CX-1000 has a slightly larger soundstage, perhaps due to it's tighter integration of the DAC with super-high quality analog circuitry. They both sound very good. The toshiba has a modern 24-bit Burr-Brown DAC, while the CD-1000 has twin 18-bit DAC's with 8x oversampling and other optimizations. Go figure...