Quote:
Well, I meant the bar when I said filter. That may be Heirs intent but Hifiman never mentioned that, they probably just noticed it sounds better with this filtered tip and that's it. Anything that is placed in the bore is going to have an effect, basic acoustics, I will not bother, so take it as you will.
I will take as I will. The tip has a bar, the auditory effect of it is
unknown. We'll leave it at that... Heir Audio says the bar is used to hold a filter between the nozzle and the tip. I know you feel different because you don't trust manufacturers in the first place.
Your statement that it boosts something still bothers me though. Basic acoustics, heck physics 101 teaches this too, teaches that placing something in front of sound will attenuate it.
I'm assuming that the resonant frequency won't make a difference because, well after calculating it, the resonant frequency of a rubber string (this is basically what the bar is) is fn = nv/2L where v is the velocity of sound and L is the length, and is an integer in [1,inf]. The length is no more than 5mm or .005m
This gives us:
fn = (331/(2*.005)) * n
fn = 331/.01 * n
fn = 33100 Hz
So the resonant frequency is 33.1 kHz. Not audible, don't even try to claim you can hear it. The longer the string, the lower the resonant frequency... So if it's smaller, it puts that number up.
Now, basic test using a bar on my speaker with a calibrated microphone, the bar is about 12-13cm and has a resonant around 1.3 kHz. Notice that in general, the frequency will only go down. There is no major boost anywhere... There is a cut in the frequency response though at 5kHz and the resonant frequency plays little roll.
Your turn to show some sort of data that says that there is better extension due to a bar.