Differences between Audio-gd "Reference 5.32" and "SA-1.32"?
Oct 13, 2012 at 12:40 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 5

MoonUnit

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Posts
103
Likes
24
I was wondering if someone could help me understand the differences between the sound of the Audio-gd "Reference 5.32" and "SA-1.32" DACs. They're both the same price. (I realize that the former is balanced, with single-ended outputs, and the latter is just single-ended. I would be using either one single-ended.) 
 
The Audio-gd website is cryptic about what the differences are. It basically says "The SA-1.32  retains rich details and high clarity with its abundant music flavor with wide and deep sound stage... The Reference 5.32 sound dead neutral and monitor." How big of a difference, relatively speaking, would this be?
 
I was looking at the "SA-2", which is probably related to the sound of the "SA-1.32", and the website says: "Musical (coloration ) but detail , smooth but not too warm." I assume that this is a darker coloration? What causes the coloration? Are the high frequencies intentionally rolled off or something like that?
 
What I'd just like is a PCM1704 DAC that's competently designed. I don't want something intentionally colored. On the other hand, if both units have a competent analog stage and the only difference is just a minor difference in sound due to the execution of the two types of circuits, I think I'd go with the slightly warmer one. It's really hard for me to choose right now though. Can anyone help?
 
Oct 20, 2012 at 2:58 PM Post #2 of 5
Sorry to post again in the same thread I started, but I was wondering if anyone could give any feedback on the sound of the Audio-GD SA-1, even if they haven't heard both units?
 
I noticed at least two SA-1s were bought and sold on the for sale forum, so some people must have heard this :) 
 
Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM Post #3 of 5
Oct 23, 2012 at 6:19 PM Post #4 of 5
Thanks for your comments on the SA-1!
 
By the way, I asked Kingwa and he said that the SA-1 rolls off the high frequencies by -2dB at 20 kHz (versus -0.5 dB in the current reference line). This is probably part of the warmer sound. I'm not sure that's something I find desirable... it's okay with a higher order filter, like some of the filters on the PWD, but with a low-order analog filter, almost the whole top octave is going to be affected. Also, it makes listening to high resolution music a lot less interesting.
 
Oct 24, 2012 at 2:47 AM Post #5 of 5
If your deductions are right, I can probably console myself with arguments like:
  • I have a disadvantage at hi res music (less than 0,5% of what I hear) and an advantage at the rest
  • At my age, high frequencies are not much audible anyway!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top