Sturdy budget earphones, best bang for the buck? (Mostly for text)
Sep 6, 2012 at 7:38 PM Post #16 of 26
Quote:
The JVC HA-Fx40 has great detail if you don't mind plenty of treble. The Panasonic RP-HJe355 has a bit less detail than the JVC HA-FX40, but it also doesn't have the excessive treble of the HA-FX40.

Hm...
 
Earlier ( http://www.head-fi.org/t/611337/jvc-ha-fx40-vs-panasonic-rp-hje355#post_8466177 ) you said you liked the Panasonic more. It also has a better build quality. (Good point.) So now which one? If I chose only one?
 
By the way price comparison in Germany:
http://www.amazon.de/Panasonic-RP-HJE355E-K-In-Ear-Koph%C3%B6rer-105-schwarz/dp/B005OJY6DO
http://www.amazon.de/JVC-HA-FX40-S-E-Marshmallow-Clarity-In-Ear-Kopfh%C3%B6rer/dp/B005TZ4ESK
 
Sep 6, 2012 at 10:23 PM Post #17 of 26
Do you like a large amount of treble? If so, pick the JVC. If plenty of treble hurts your ears, pick the Panasonic. I like both, however with some music that has plenty of treble, the HA-FX40 hurts my ears. With recording that are treble deficient though, the HA-FX40 really shines.
 
Sep 7, 2012 at 4:03 AM Post #18 of 26
I don't know. I'm not that expert in it. I mostly listen to rock, electronic and text. :)
 
Also count the fact that here in Europe I can buy the JVC for much more expensive than the Panasonic! Also the build quality matters for me to last it long.
 
Sep 16, 2012 at 7:28 PM Post #21 of 26
Sep 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM Post #24 of 26
Thanks for your recommendation JK1!
 
I bought the Panasonic (HJE355). It's OK. Does it require burn in? I can't compare it to other IEM s since I usually own one pair of IEMs the one I but after the previous one is broken. I can only compare it to the Koss PortaPro: It's clearly detailed and also has a metallic feel to its sound. :)
 
Sep 24, 2012 at 4:55 PM Post #25 of 26
The Panasonic RP-HJE355 doesn't seem to change that much with burn in.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top