This weekend-- Melos SHA-Gold vs. Berning MicroZOTL at chez markl's.....
Jan 11, 2002 at 11:41 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 47

markl

Hangin' with the monkeys.
Member of the Trade: Lawton Audio
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
9,130
Likes
49
Hee hee. Stealing a page from MRael's playbook, I'd thought I'd tease you a little with a little face-off of my own.

My Melos SHA-Gold is here! I've got her hooked up to my Sony R10's right now. The battle is joined!

The SHA-Gold is the upgraded and newer version of the Melos SHA-1. Since Melos is kaput, it's hard finding info on the evolution of the Melos SHA line, but for the curious, here's what I was able to find out:

"The Sha-1 was a very popular Headphone/Line stage preamplifier that was actually designed to work with complete line of GRADO headphones. It had very innovative circuitry employing the use of two 6922 tubes as amplification. The early models had only two inputs one headphone output, and one set of line level outputs. The majority of them, however, had three inputs and dual headphone outputs that would cut out (automatically) the sound from the line level outs when a headphone was plugged in. It originally sold for $995.00.

The Sha-Gold was a giant step up from the Sha-1 as it employed the use of a light controlled volume and balance system called the PHO-tentiometor. Using light, there was actually no potentiometers in the signal path and making this type unit the first of it's kind anywhere. The unit was completely remote controlled and used an analog meter to check the balance level. It had six inputs and one headphone output, one line level output and one passive line level output. It also used a pair of 6922 tubes for amplification. (SHA-Gold was $2K-- markl)

The Sha-Maestro was a much more streamlined version of the Sha Gold having the same inputs but instead of passive outputs, it had two sets of line level outputs and one set of balanced outputs. It also no longer employed the use of the PHO-tentiometor circuitry. The unit was still completely remote controlled but did not use an analog meter for the balance. Both the volume and the balance controls were accessible from the front panel as well as the remote control. It too, used two 6922 tubes for amplification.
(SHA Maestro was also $2K-- markl)

This info via the MELOS AUDIO RESTORATION. They'll service your Melos and tweak it too.

My SHA-Gold's insides do not look much like the pictures of the guts of the SHA-1 that someone posted here. The board with the Headphone section in my Gold is larger and has more "stuff" on it. There's also additional boards with more componentry in the gold, presumably for the remote. I'm very technical
rolleyes.gif



I'll give you this little tidbit now, the Melos and the ZOTL are two completely different sounding amps. No doubt about it.
What a fun weekend this will be for me!

markl

BTW, having a remote volume control for your headphone amp is every bit as cool as it sounds!
 
Jan 12, 2002 at 12:53 AM Post #7 of 47
Love those smilies KR!

Not sure if this will help you, but on the OUTSIDE, the SHA-Gold looks much more like this picture of the Maestro, but the Gold has a big analog meter on it for the "photentiometer":

http://www.audiooutlet.com/catalog/i...losmaestro.jpg

Also, here's a link to a nice page for the Maestro. You'll notice that the page also describes a "Gold Reference" and according to this page, the Maestro Reference does have the "photentiometer", contradicting what Melos Audio Restoration sez:

http://www.audiooutlet.com/catalog/15.html

It's all very confusing. There's seems to be the following "versions" of the SHA:

1. SHA-1
2. SHA-Gold
3. SHA-Gold Reference
4. SHA-Maestro
5. Sha Gold Maestro
6. SHA-Maestro Reference

It appears that Melos released these products in that order, roughly thusly:

1. SHA-1 Circa '89
2. SHA-Gold Circa '95
3. SHA Maestro circa '97

My unit is just a Gold and was made in '97. Melos seems to have offered upgrade programs so some of these designations may refer to the upgraded units, not a "production" version.

AAAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHH!!!! The thing is all the Gold and Maestro variations sold for $2K, so what's the difference? Anyone know?

markl
 
Jan 12, 2002 at 1:30 AM Post #8 of 47
It's official, markl... you have way too much nice equipment for your own good. And what's up w/ the recent trend of being a tease, like Vert?
wink.gif
very_evil_smiley.gif
 
Jan 12, 2002 at 2:13 AM Post #9 of 47
Yeah, but unlike some of the other geeks here, I can't afford to keep a "collection" of equipment. For me, it's in with new and out with the old.

I can tell you this, whichever amp I decide to keep after this showdown, some head-fier will end up with a top-class amp. I've tried a LOT of amps, if you've been following my "misadventures" here and earlier at headwize.

The ZOTL bested all the others overall. The Melos has some tough competition, but it's giving as good as it gets so far. Both superb but different amps!

I have ordered some better tubes from Kevin at upscale. The stock Melos tubes (Sovtek cheapies) are absolutely SHRILL. Luckily I had a nicer set of Sovteks from my days with the EMP. These are by no means the best 6922 tubes made, but they are much better than the Melos stock. Changing the tubes made a huge difference in sound, so I'd say that the Melos benefitted even more than the ZOTL did with quality tubes.

Also, the previous owner said he barely used the Melos and never used the headphone jack, so there is doubtless some "burn-in" ahead.

I should get my new goodies from upscale on Tues. I'll post findings later next week.

markl
 
Jan 12, 2002 at 6:53 PM Post #12 of 47
I got the Russian military 6922's from the 70's that are tested by Kevin for lowest noise, highest gain, etc. He sells several levels of these tubes at different prices, but in an application like headphone amp, it's important to get the best performing samples. This particular tube is very well thought of and long-lasting and rugged.

They were $50 for the pair. In the past I used them as the output tubes in my Earmax Pro, and I think they were in part responsible for the phenomenal bass response I got out of the unit.

Going into the world of NOS tubes is a risky business. I trust Kevin and his methodologies, so he's always my first stop.

markl
 
Jan 13, 2002 at 10:29 PM Post #13 of 47
So markl, how's that review coming?
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Jan 13, 2002 at 10:45 PM Post #14 of 47
Since determining that switching tubes radically impacts sound, I am reserving my critical eval til I get my first real good set of 6dj8's from upscale mid-week. I also have to account for burn-in on the the new tubes, so maybe next weekend.

I'll let the suspense stew a litlle.
evil_smiley.gif


markl
 
Jan 13, 2002 at 11:04 PM Post #15 of 47
Oh, for crying out... that's just wrong, markl. Keep this up, and you'll be a big a tease as Vert!
mad.gif
rolleyes.gif
wink.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top