Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Shure srh940 vs the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii. (james mcprogger here you go)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shure srh940 vs the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii. (james mcprogger here you go)

post #1 of 24
Thread Starter 

I'm going to try and keep this short and simple.

 

 

I had james mcprogger ask me to compare these a month ago.

 

 

 

Lets begin

 

The shure srh 940

These are meh, the vocals sound atrocious. Every thing else sounds great however. They are great for rock and metal due to the mids and highs emphases. They are bad for electronic.

 

They are not bassy and to many lack bass. Vocals are very fake sounding. They sound muffled to me. This are smooth and non fatiguing. These are hard to drive and perform poorly from a portable source like an iphone.

 

Sennheiser hd 25 1 ii

These are imo the best portables under $200. The bass is emphasized enough to give it a good thump for electronic. The highs are well extended and the mids are well presented. These are v shaped frequency curve headphones. They can be however harsh on many recordings and source matters. These are relatively easy to drive and any portable player should handle it fine.

 

 

For rock and metal music

For you metal heads out there the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii  is vastly superior. Much funner and more realistic sounding.

 

 

For electronic and bass music

Again the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii is much superior but thats to be expected.

 

 

For acoustic, folk, classical, and jazz

Here is where the shure srh940 does well. But be warned if there is any vocals in the track it will sound awkward.

 

 

Overall conclusions

The hd 25 1 ii is a much superior headphone in every aspect except sound stage.

 



Personal opinion?

Avoid the shure srh940 like the plague. It's shures version of the beats. About 2x over priced for what it is.

post #2 of 24
Woot woot. Can't wait to get my HD25 1 II in the mail. But please do not compare these to the beats... they are at least 4X better than beats Studio, for same price.
post #3 of 24
Can you say a bit more about how the HD25 beats the SRH940 for rock/metal?
post #4 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PomPWNius View Post

Woot woot. Can't wait to get my HD25 1 II in the mail. But please do not compare these to the beats... they are at least 4X better than beats Studio, for same price.


I was comparing it as they are both over priced. The beats being 3x overpriced while the shure srh940 is 2x overpriced.

post #5 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PomPWNius View Post

Can you say a bit more about how the HD25 beats the SRH940 for rock/metal?


It's got more aggressive bass. It's got shiny highs. And smooth mids. They do exceptionally well.

post #6 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcasey25raptor View Post



It's got more aggressive bass. It's got shiny highs. And smooth mids. They do exceptionally well.

lol whatever that means. i dont know this audio vocabulary haha. Well, my pairs coming on friday. I'll see for myself smily_headphones1.gif
post #7 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PomPWNius View Post


lol whatever that means. i dont know this audio vocabulary haha. Well, my pairs coming on friday. I'll see for myself smily_headphones1.gif


The highs/treble is well extended with a recession from 3-5 khz.

post #8 of 24

I just got my HD 25s in the mail today. Haven't really took them off yet. Best headphones I bought in my life (noob headfier). I heard the Shures before, they where OK.

post #9 of 24

a proper amp maybe? Heard the shures sound much better with a decent desktop amp

post #10 of 24
They are very different cans. The shures are hardly designed as portables, and have a far more neutral sound than the 25's. That said, the senns are more fun.
post #11 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcasey25raptor View Post



The highs/treble is well extended with a recession from 3-5 khz.

So basically, in rock, cymbals will just be a bit softer?
post #12 of 24

Until you hear it, it's really hard to describe the difference between forward/aggressive headphones and laid back ones.  For rock, though, a pair of aggressive sounding headphones offer a lot more excitement.

 

Unfortunately, the opposite is true for some other genres, gaming, and symphonic recordings.

post #13 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelpearce View Post

Until you hear it, it's really hard to describe the difference between forward/aggressive headphones and laid back ones.  For rock, though, a pair of aggressive sounding headphones offer a lot more excitement.

Unfortunately, the opposite is true for some other genres, gaming, and symphonic recordings.

Is the SRH940 laid back? If so, I am really up to a complete change in sound signature. I am still at the beginning stages of audiophilism, finding the sound signature that I like. wink.gif
post #14 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PomPWNius View Post


Is the SRH940 laid back? If so, I am really up to a complete change in sound signature. I am still at the beginning stages of audiophilism, finding the sound signature that I like. wink.gif


The srh940 is imo laid back

 

post #15 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcasey25raptor View Post



The srh940 is imo laid back

Cool. I want it to sound bad to you guys lol. A week ago I wouldn't :P. Now that they are gone I do. I wasn't very impressed by them, compared to my ETY HF5 which I bought for $98. Only difference I heard was louder cymbals, and some random things in songs I didn't hear before.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Shure srh940 vs the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii. (james mcprogger here you go)