Review || JVC HA-FXT90, Fischer Audio Tandem & Radius HP-TWF21 aka DDM2 [Updated 01/16/12]

Nov 10, 2011 at 9:51 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 22

-y0-

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Posts
902
Likes
26
Intro
I've always been intrigued by dual dynamic earphones ever since I read about the DDM [HP-TWF11] by Radius. It just seemed so interesting that 2 tiny speakers can be fit into an earphone. I never got around to getting the DDM due to reading about the fit issues. As time went by, Radius came out with the DDM2 [HP-TWF21] which stated improvement in sound and fit but it was much too expensive. Recently JVC and Fischer Audio got into the game with the HA-FXT90 and Tandem with much more affordable prices. I really wanted to compare the 3 side by side so I decided to get all 3 and I'd like to thank Dimitri @ Musica Acoustics and David @ Frogbeats for making it happen. Below are pictures of how the dual dynamics are implemented:
 
  
 
The DDM2 Nightmare
As much as I wanted to hear how the DDM2 was, it never happened. I don't know what's up with Radius and their quality control but here's what happened. My first set came with a faulty right channel where it produced no bass and had less volume. The 2nd pair that Dimitri sent even after he tested it was also faulty. This time it worked for the first 30 seconds then the left channel lost bass and produced lower volume. Dimitri was kind enough to send yet another set and I figured third times a charm. Boy was I wrong, the right channel was faulty from the start. I don't know about you but for retailing around $250, you'd expect it to have a better build quality and quality control. It reminds me how bad Monster products were. This whole experience should be noted for anyone that's interested in getting the DDM2, be very careful because you may receive a defect. So the DDM2 will be reviewed on everything except the sound since I never got to hear its capabilities.
 
Packaging & Accessories
  1. DDM2Comes in a nice packaging consisting of 6 pairs of eartips, L-plug adapter, wiping cloth, and a nice clamshell zippered case. I felt the packaging was very bulky and could've been smaller considering it doesn't really come with that many accessories.
  2. FXT90: Comes in a small clear plastic case with 3 pairs of eartips, shirt clip, cord winder, and clamshell zipper case. Packaging was simple but it would've been nicer if more eartips were included.
  3. Tandem: Comes in a small paper packaging with 10 pairs of eartips and a cloth pouch. While the nice amount of eartips is nice, the pouch is pretty useless. A clamshell or some kind of small hard case would've been better.
 
   
   
 
Comfort & Isolation
  1. DDM2: Comfort is alright, the half earbud style sometimes bothered me. Isolation wasn't that great due to the shallow insertion.
  2. FXT90: Very comfortable to wear hours at a time so no problems there. Isolation was pretty average.
  3. Tandem: Not as comfortable as the FXT90 but still able to be worn for extended amount of time. Isolation was about the same as the FXT90.
 
Build & Cable
  1. DDM2: I was not impressed at all. The all plastic build looked cheap especially for the price. The cable is a joke, tangle-prone and microphonic.
  2. FXT90: It's mostly made of plastic but did not feel cheap but rather solid. The cable was easy to handle, soft, and reminded me of the cable on the IE8.
  3. Tandem: Like the FXT90, plastic build but felt solid. The cable is cloth-covered and was quite nice, very easy to handle.
 


 
Sound
  1. DDM2: A very fun, musical sound. Relaxed treble, full mids, and powerful, deep bass with a large soundstage. It's not the most detailed or analytical earphone but the other attributes sure makes up for it.
  2. FXT90: Such an exciting sound. Crisp treble, great mids, strong bass. It has a fun, musical, in-your-face type of sound. Easily one of my favorite earphones I've had to this day. Makes listening to music a joy and just sounds great with all types of music.
  3. Tandem: Has a very laid-back, relaxing sound. I can easily listen to music through it without fatigue for hours and hours. Treble, mids, bass all sound so smooth and is very easy to listen to. Doesn't really do anything bad, just an all-around great earphone to listen to.
 
Conclusion
The FXT90 and Tandem are some of the best I've heard in its price range which is <$150. I see them as great complements to each other, FXT90 being fun, exciting, musical and the Tandem being laid-back, relaxing, smooth. If I had to choose one, I'd pick the FXT90 due to the musicality and exciting sound. I was highly impressed by both. Not only because of the price, but also due to the excellent sound they produce. Really can't go wrong with either one. The DDM2 being around $250 or so isn't the best priced earphone but it certainly had a unique sound. It had a large soundstage with deep,powerful bass and relaxed treble which I really liked. If it wasn't for the fit and build issues, the DDM2 would've been my favorite out of the three.













 
 
Nov 10, 2011 at 10:13 PM Post #2 of 22
Great review as always and I love the pictures. I never realized that you can see the dual dynamics on the FXT90s.

Looks like Radius really need to step up their quality control.
 
Nov 10, 2011 at 10:38 PM Post #4 of 22


Quote:
Sounds like we hear the fxt90 and tandem similarly. Any thoughts on the fx700 in comparison with the fxt90?


To me, they have a similar spark in their treble with the FX700 being slightly more detailed. FXT90s mids are more prominent but the FX700s is clearer and the bass on the FX700 is definitely more powerful, just sounds great. I just don't know why JVC didn't make the cable length on the FX700 the same as the FXT90, it'd be much more convenient when traveling with it. Right now, I use the FX700 on my desk or just nearby in general.
 
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 7:50 AM Post #6 of 22


Quote:
To me, they have a similar spark in their treble with the FX700 being slightly more detailed. FXT90s mids are more prominent but the FX700s is clearer and the bass on the FX700 is definitely more powerful, just sounds great. I just don't know why JVC didn't make the cable length on the FX700 the same as the FXT90, it'd be much more convenient when traveling with it. Right now, I use the FX700 on my desk or just nearby in general.
 


That's how I would describe the difference.  I hope JVC makes a successor to the FX700 one day.
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 9:03 AM Post #7 of 22
Hi shotgunshane,
 
I saw on your gear-list that you own the Zo. Are you using it together with the FXT90?
I'm particularly interested how much extra bass can be pumped out from the FXT90, I dont know
what are the limits of a tiny 5mm driver (even if it is tuned for bass)
 
Could it satisfy a bass-head (like the FX700) or it will start to distort earlier?
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM Post #8 of 22


Quote:
Hi shotgunshane,
 
I saw on your gear-list that you own the Zo. Are you using it together with the FXT90?
I'm particularly interested how much extra bass can be pumped out from the FXT90, I dont know
what are the limits of a tiny 5mm driver (even if it is tuned for bass)
 
Could it satisfy a bass-head (like the FX700) or it will start to distort earlier?



Yes I think it could satisfy you.  First of all, what I really like about the FXT90 is that I do not need to use the zo to be satisfied with the bass quantity.  However I did find that using the first few steps of the zo did give more sub bass presence, bringing it closer to the level of the FX700 and I noticed no distortion.  
 
I have the zo v1, which is not produced any longer.  They just released v2 of the zo but it has some issues that they are fixing: hiss and problems with volume being too loud.  They've discovered the problem and a solution and should have it fixed soon.  So if you want to pick up a zo v2, I'd recommend waiting about a month to make sure they've ironed out all the issues from the first batch run of the new release.
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 12:54 PM Post #10 of 22
-y0- nice review. Could you pleas compare the Tandem sound to some other IEM I might be familiar with in general. I'm trying to get a better handle on what you mean when you say the sound is more smooth? Is the bass significantly lacking? Is it pretty much a neutral sound? Thanks in advance.
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 1:19 PM Post #11 of 22


Quote:
-y0- nice review. Could you pleas compare the Tandem sound to some other IEM I might be familiar with in general. I'm trying to get a better handle on what you mean when you say the sound is more smooth? Is the bass significantly lacking? Is it pretty much a neutral sound? Thanks in advance.


Thanks, I'd say has more of a midrange focused sound in general. What I mean by smooth is that none of the sound is aggressive, all very easy on the ears. The bass isn't lacking at all but the GR07 and FXT90 has more rumble. Vocals sounds pretty good on the Tandem without being forward, I enjoyed many vocal dependent tracks on it.
 
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 8:20 PM Post #12 of 22


Quote:
Thanks, I'd say has more of a midrange focused sound in general. What I mean by smooth is that none of the sound is aggressive, all very easy on the ears. The bass isn't lacking at all but the GR07 and FXT90 has more rumble. Vocals sounds pretty good on the Tandem without being forward, I enjoyed many vocal dependent tracks on it.
 


Agree with this.  Bass isn't lacking at all but does have less rumble and power of the other two.  I think vocals sound pretty sublime on Tandem and are more forward than on the FXT90.  Treble isn't as laid back as say the Atrio M5 but it's definitely smooth and non-fatiguing without any issues with placement queues and clarity.
 
Nov 11, 2011 at 11:44 PM Post #13 of 22
I hear smooth used a lot when talking about the Realvoice IEM. How does the Tandem compare to the Spyder Realvoice?
 
Nov 13, 2011 at 10:56 PM Post #15 of 22
Fun read. Definitely worthy of an addition to the FXT90 thread. 
 
I've heard the two but didn't compare them directly. I think Joker perhaps has. The Realvoice is very similar to the Tandem, both smooth and midrange oriented. The Tandem probably has the edge for being more refined in the bass. I didn't like the Realvoice at all in the beginning, but it grew on me. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top