Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphone Amps › FiiO E6 - story of the tiny amp continues... (w/ review on 1st page)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

FiiO E6 - story of the tiny amp continues... (w/ review on 1st page)

post #1 of 540
Thread Starter 

Here is the new chapter for the story about FiiO's tiny amps' line-up: E6 has been in development for over a year now and ready to be launched months ago. But due to the respect for Westone, which has decided to bundle the new E6 with some of their IEM, the launch is delayed till 25th of August. Yes, the end of this month, so that Westone will have enough time to finish up the bundle pack on their end.

 

Anyway, I have had this little marvel for a few weeks now and I can't begin to tell you how impressed I am. Will it beats E11? No. But will it out-do E5 several times over? Hell yes. For those who think E5 is nothing but toy, this is where FiiO is trying to prove to you how serious a tiny amp that cost much less than a decent meal can go. I haven't had the time to review it just yet, but rest assured  the review will come. Here are some pictures for you to look at, and I'll answer any question as long as it is not overly complicated.

 


[UPDATE] FiiO E6 Review - 25th AUG, 2011.

 

E6-01.jpg

 

Tech Prelude

So E6 is using the same set of opamps as the E7, does they sound just the same?  Well, yes and no. Yes is that the general sound signature of E6 is still consistent to other FiiO’s amps, clear and mostly transparent. No is that the actual design of the circuit has been changed. As told, E6 utilizes a different power circuit to provide true +/- power for the opamp to improve the performance instead of the old charge-pump design on E7.  Well, I am not an electronic engineer so don’t ask me about the detail. All I can say is the E6 does sound better than E7 – and I will leave the detail for later.

 

SPEC

Spec is mostly the same as E5 / E7..

 

Output Power: 150mW (16Ω); 16mW (300Ω)
Headphone Impedance Range: 16 Ω ~ 300 Ω
SNR: ≥95dB (A weighted)
Distortion: <0.009% (10mW)
Frequency Range: 10Hz ~ 100kHz
Power Supply: Internal rechargeable Li-ion battery
Recharging: USB 5V DC 500mA
Size: 41mm x 40.2mm x 8mm
Weight: 16g

 

E6-02.jpg

 

Packaging, Accessories and Build Quality

As you can see on the picture, the packaging is similar to FiiO’s own E1. Blister pack isn’t my favorite but I guess one can’t be choosy on a $30 amp. Accessories wise, there is an USB cable for charging, two 3.5mm-to-3.5mm interconnecting cables (one L-to-L  three inches and one straight-to-straight 2.5 feet), and two transparent back clip. The back clip will fit into the triangular opening on the E6 and it is very secure. Also, the back clip is made out of polycarbonate and it is extremely strong (for a clip of this size). Just so you know, polycarbonate is the same stuff Mythbuster use for their blast shield most of the time. In case you do manage to break one, there is an extra clip waiting.

 

E6-03.jpg

 

E6-04.jpg

 

While the E6 does look a little cheap since it is all made out of plastic and extremely light (16g), the overall build quality, as you can expect from FiiO, is quite decent. The whole housing is glued tight and nothing is loose, including the shiny triangular slot that holds the back clip. The volume buttons feel really solid, so is the power/ EQ / hold switch.

 

One of the tests I have done is on electromagnetic Interference – basically it is the same cellphone test I have done on my E5 review. I placed the amp very close to my cellphone then I made a quick call to myself to check any RF interference. To my surprise, E6 is dead silent the whole time, not even when it was placed next to the cellphone.

 

Overall, I am pleased.  While metal housing is classier, it really is the interference that I thought will be problematic for E6. Yet E6 is able to prove it is better than E5 in that regard.

 

E6-05.jpg

Digital volume control on the side.

 

E6-06.jpg

 

Battery Life

The listed battery life is 10 hours, which is the same as E5. Though I didn’t actually do a battery drain test, I did use it for over 6 hours or so between each recharge. I think the actual run time will depend largely how you use the amp, but 8~10 hours seems perfectly achievable to me.

 

Gain and Hiss

The old E5 has a gain of 5dB (3dB is double in signal), the new E6 is said to be 2.8dB higher than E5. For the RMAA test I did, the result indicate roughly a 3dB difference between E5 and E6, so that confirms the increased gain of 2.8dB – which totals the E6 gain to about 8dB. What that means is E6 can get really loud if you want it too. However, there available power is still limited by the opamp in use, so don’t expect E6 to out shine E11 in that regard. I have tested E6 on 150 ohm IEM like the RE262 and ER4S to low impedance IEM down to 16 ohm UE200. The results are all very decent. It might not able to sound as good as $100+ amp, but the performance is admirable for such a small device.

 

Hiss is an issue to E5 when it comes to loud volume. Basically the amp (E5) stays well-behave when it is in low volume. But hiss starts to increase once the volume is set to over half of the total volume. The reason is how E5 increases its volume - it is done by increasing the gain (which is different from the common method of limiting input signal like in cmoy). The downside of gain adjusted volume is that gain increment also means the internal noise will increase as well, and that is what causes E5 to hiss when the volume is up. On E6, the volume is also controlled with gain so hiss does exist. The good news is the hiss level is about half as much as E5 and like E5, only occurs when you set the volume to very high. What that means is, as long as you have a decent level of input, you shouldn’t find hiss a problem on E6.

 

E6-07.jpg

Pushing the power switch up for 3 seconds to turn the amp on/off. Push it once when the amp is on to switch between different EQ. Push the power switch down to lock the volume setting (hold).

 

E6-08.jpg

Blue light is the power on indicator (turns red when charging). Red dot shows the amp is on EQ1 (turns to blue for EQ2, purple for EQ3 and no light for flat EQ)

 

Sound Quality and EQ

So how do E6 compared to E5 and E7? Compared to E5, E6 (flat EQ) is cleaner, In fact, even cleaner than E7. It loses a tad of warm from the mid, but becomes crisper on the treble. Overall, E6 sounds a hair more extended and revealing than E7, which also means it sounds better than E5 by a decent margin.

 

How about JDS cmoyBB and SoundMAGIC A10? For cmoyBB, as I have mentioned from my cmoyBB review – it is better than E7 but not vastly. What cmoyBB does really well is on the rendering on space, layering and air, though it also carries an extra sense of lushness (which I see it more as a kind of coloration. Note: I prefer neutral amp). To me, E6 fits nicely between E7 and cmoyBB. However, that is assuming both are on flat EQ. Once E6 is on EQ2, the two are incredibly close with the same richness in sound – those who love their amp sounding rich will definitely like this. For A10, I always consider it to be comparable to E7 but come with a very different flavor. It is warm, full and musical. To me, E6 is technically more accurate but just like how A10 compares to E7, they are very different sounding. With EQ1, E6 can actually capture some of the warm and fullness of A10, though still not quite as musical and spacious.

 

SpectrumE6.jpg

RMAA tested with 16 ohm load. Don't mind the ripple beyond 5kHz and drop off near 20kHz, it is caused by my soundcard. EQ3 was adjusted (-3dB) to show the difference to flat EQ.

 

So if you haven’t noticed, I just finish describe to you what I think really makes E6 a true gem – its EQ. It can be clean, lush, or warm and full on a push of a switch. Sure it is not going to turn into cmoyBB or A10, but the effects are still enjoyable and fun. Even without the improved sound quality from E7, the EQ on E6 alone will worth the investment. The one EQ I haven’t mentioned is EQ3, which is a 3dB reduction across the whole frequency range. Different from E7 which has a limiting input of 1.4V (any higher will clip), E6 is capable of 2V input.  But for even higher input, E6 will still clip and render the amp useless. The EQ3 is basically a feature to prevent that from happening by lowering the overall gain so the amp can take a larger signal without clipping. In RMAA test, EQ3 performs as good as flat EQ except for the lower gain. I tested E6’s EQ3 on s:flo2’s line-out (which will clip E5 and E7) and it actually sounds pretty good - very comparable to S:flo2 headphone-out. Of course this is done to proof a point rather than any real practicality since the headphone-out is pretty good already.

 

So how about E6’s big brother, the E11? Besides being a bit more forward sounding, E6 lacks the overall resolution and authority to really compete with th3e much more powerful E11, which I do consider to be a class better than E6. But putting that aside, both are better amp than what their price tags would have want you to believe in.

 

*HifiMan RE0 is used as the reference IEM in the review. Sources include Sansa Fuze (LO), iPod Nano 4G (LO) and s:flo2 (LO)

 

E6-09.jpg

E6 (left) and E5 (right)

 

Verdict

As I was told that E6 took almost a year of development to get it right. FiiO has managed to address some of the weakness in old E5 / E7 and add some very useful features to E6. While it may be just an entry level amp that cost about $30, I think FiiO is again taking the concept of entry level to a new height with E6.

 

 


Edited by ClieOS - 8/24/11 at 8:27pm
post #2 of 540
What do all the buttons do. Charged by usb?
post #3 of 540

Looks great! How is the build quality?

post #4 of 540
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExpatinJapan View Post

What do all the buttons do. Charged by usb?


Yes, charged by USB. One side is volume control (digital, much like E5), the other side is On/Off (3 seconds) and hold. On/Off also doubles as the EQ button and gain switch in single push. It goes from flat -> EQ1 (red LED on the back, 1st bass boost) -> EQ2 (blue LED on the back, 2nd bass boost) -> Gain reduction mode (red+blue LED on the back, for high output source such as T51 / S:flo2 to avoid clipping).

 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcpk View Post

Looks great! How is the build quality?

It is all plastic, so some might find it cheap compared to the full metal on E5. It is also extremely light (lighter than the battery on E11). Overall however is quite decent.
 

 

post #5 of 540

Looks like it's perfect for it's purpose.

post #6 of 540

at the 4th pic, what are that 2 clips?

post #7 of 540

I'm guessing shirt/belt clips. Nice that they include a spare.

post #8 of 540
Thread Starter 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadow84 View Post

at the 4th pic, what are that 2 clips?

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armaegis View Post

I'm guessing shirt/belt clips. Nice that they include a spare.


Correct. It is made out of plastic and removable so FiiO includes a spare in case someone broke or misplaced one.

 

post #9 of 540

If it's cheap enough, I'll buy one just because I want one more gadget.

post #10 of 540
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrProggie View Post

If it's cheap enough, I'll buy one just because I want one more gadget.

It should be around the same price as E5, last I heard.
 

 

post #11 of 540

Listed specs are same as the E5:

150 mW into 16 ohms

16 mW into 300 ohms

>= 95 dB (A)

< 0.009% (10 mW) -- though in practice, the E5 could do under 0.02% even at 15 ohms at 100mW, so this isn't much of a cherry-picked best case scenario

 

...and so on.  Same as the quoted values for the E7 actually.  E5 and E7 both use the TPA6130 output amp chip, though they use different pre-amp chips.  I'm guessing the TPA6130 is used again, especially since this part has that digital volume control built in.

 

 

I'm kind of wondering what's really different from the E5 aside from the housing and ports/buttons layout.  There's the different bass boost option.  Also, the gain reduction mode is very useful, to use with those high output sources.  So I'm going to guess that it's the gain stage that's different.  One complaint about the E5 was that the maximum possible gain was like 6 dB (or so, I forget exactly).  If you had a high output source, the E5 would clip the input.  On the other hand, if you had a pretty low output source like many portables, the gain was not always sufficiently high to make use of the E5's max output power.

 

Is the gain in the normal mode higher than for the E5?  That would be great.

 

edit: originally I put 3dB, but on second thought I think it was more like 6dB.  My E5 is currently plugged into my TV, so I don't feel like moving it to test, sorry.  tongue_smile.gif


Edited by mikeaj - 8/9/11 at 9:32am
post #12 of 540
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeaj View Post

Listed specs are same as the E5:

150 mW into 16 ohms

16 mW into 300 ohms

>= 95 dB (A)

< 0.009% (10 mW) -- though in practice, the E5 could do under 0.02% even at 15 ohms at 100mW, so this isn't much of a cherry-picked best case scenario

 

...and so on.  Same as the quoted values for the E7 actually.  E5 and E7 both use the TPA6130 output amp chip, though they use different pre-amp chips.  I'm guessing the TPA6130 is used again, especially since this part has that digital volume control built in.

 

 

I'm kind of wondering what's really different from the E5 aside from the housing and ports/buttons layout.  There's the different bass boost option.  Also, the gain reduction mode is very useful, to use with those high output sources.  So I'm going to guess that it's the gain stage that's different.  One complaint about the E5 was that the maximum possible gain was like 6 dB (or so, I forget exactly).  If you had a high output source, the E5 would clip the input.  On the other hand, if you had a pretty low output source like many portables, the gain was not always sufficiently high to make use of the E5's max output power.

 

Is the gain in the normal mode higher than for the E5?  That would be great.

 

edit: originally I put 3dB, but on second thought I think it was more like 6dB.  My E5 is currently plugged into my TV, so I don't feel like moving it to test, sorry.  tongue_smile.gif

 

Gain is definitely higher on the E6, but I don't have an exact dB. Also, I can't confirm this yet - I think E6 is using the same opamp as E7 amp section, but the power supply section has been redesigned to give the better performance. I haven't have the time to compare it to E7 yet, but to E5, E6 sounds more transparent and dynamic.

post #13 of 540

So tiny, cute, and affordable. Hard not try one just like the E5 esp. since it should be a bit more amp and less volume booster. Design is pretty sweet with the small size/light weight, loop/clip choice, and extra clip. This can be a comfortable little necklace style amp unlike the E5 which is a bit weighty or the E3( a bit thick and no loop or clip).

post #14 of 540

This looks pretty awesome.  If it's basically just a better version of the E7 as a portable amp, then I'm all over it...it's a bit of a pain to carry the E7 around everywhere.


Do you know where it will be sold at first?

post #15 of 540
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBomb77766 View Post

Do you know where it will be sold at first?

It should be everywhere. For what I know, FiiO is overstocking E6 because of the Westone bundle deal. So this time we won't need to wait very long before most dealers get their hand on E6.
 

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Headphone Amps
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphone Amps › FiiO E6 - story of the tiny amp continues... (w/ review on 1st page)