W3 vs. UM3X - Very Interesting Comparison...
May 15, 2011 at 7:53 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 5
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Posts
854
Likes
56
I just took this from Westone's FAQ - Source
 
Although both models feature three drivers, the sound signatures are tuned for different applications. The UM3X was designed for musicians to use as an in-ear musicians’ monitor while performing live onstage. The Westone 3 was specifically designed for personal listening to prerecorded and processed music.
 
The UM3X’s three drivers provide detailed sound across all frequencies, but also feature increased low end response as compared to the Westone 3. The additional low end is necessary for musicians since live sound is not as refined as prerecorded and mastered music. Many times the musician needs to have more headroom in the low frequency to replicate their instrument accurately. This is particularly true for drummers and bassists. While the UM3X will also work well for personal listening applications, the potential purchaser should be aware that the sound signature does favor the performing musician.
 
The Westone 3 offers a sound signature that was designed for the high-end audiophile who is looking for a well balanced sound across the frequency response without accentuating any particular frequency band.
 
Isn't this the complete opposite with the UM3X being the more 'balanced' universal and the W3 having the increased low end response? Hmmm...

 
May 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM Post #2 of 5
I think most people WOULD prefer the W3.  UM3X is truly a musicians stage monitor.  Fairly balanced but generally geared towards the lower frequecies, I would take the W3 in a heartbeat for representing music better.  I find UM3X kind of dull and dead sounding.  W3 more lively, sparkly, engaging,....
 
May 15, 2011 at 11:38 PM Post #3 of 5


Quote:
I think most people WOULD prefer the W3.  UM3X is truly a musicians stage monitor.  Fairly balanced but generally geared towards the lower frequecies, I would take the W3 in a heartbeat for representing music better.  I find UM3X kind of dull and dead sounding.  W3 more lively, sparkly, engaging,....


I thought the same thing, but Westone's comparison of the two is the opposite.
confused.gif

 
May 16, 2011 at 12:53 AM Post #4 of 5
With this kind of reasoning, it is amazing the W4 is as good as it is. That's a weird way to describe the W3. Not "accentuating any particular frequency band." Ha!
 
Quote:
 
The Westone 3 offers a sound signature that was designed for the high-end audiophile who is looking for a well balanced sound across the frequency response without accentuating any particular frequency band.



 
 
May 16, 2011 at 9:47 AM Post #5 of 5
The UM3X has a mid range bump to provide better response in the male vocal and guitar frequency response.  I use them all day long at work for music, while i do agree they are a bit boring for mastered audio.  They are still very accurate though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top