What's the best quality audio file?
May 2, 2011 at 3:16 AM Post #76 of 89
You just get a big file which sounds the same
 
 
37.2 MB (39,021,032 bytes)   FLAC Normalized
9.38 MB (9,838,222 bytes)     Mp3 before a FLAC was made
 
May 2, 2011 at 3:31 AM Post #77 of 89


Quote:
How do I encode mp3 to flac?



If you're smart, you don't.
L3000.gif

 
May 2, 2011 at 10:01 AM Post #81 of 89
Flac sounds same as Wave and will be 50% to 80% size.
 
 
May 2, 2011 at 2:26 PM Post #82 of 89


Quote:
.WAV sucks. :p  The cases in which an uncompressed file is needed for storage are almost negligible.  Though most conversion programs seem to convert compressed files to WAV before converting to another format, at least the ones I use do.

 
IME WAV sounds every bit as good as FLAC and AIFF, and a bit better then ALAC at times (but I think that had more to do with the ripping software than the format).  But I'd agree with the general disregard for that format, not because of SQ, but because it does not support metadata, and becomes a royal PITA to move around files or restore from backup, etc.  I would definitely stay away from WAV for that reason alone.  It also takes up a whole lot more space than other lossless options.  Though storage is certainly cheap, I'm pushing 1.5tb currently (mix of FLAC, AIFF and ALAC) and that is growing, since I put more priority on music than on gear.  If my stuff were in WAV I'd be pushing 3tb and probably be using multiple drives.  As it stands I can get by with a 2TB RAID, but wonder how long that will last. 
 
 
 
May 2, 2011 at 3:52 PM Post #83 of 89
May 2, 2011 at 4:27 PM Post #84 of 89
Quote:
sml1226 said:


Quote:
MaxwellDemon said:


The bigger the better, right?
tongue.gif


So by that logic, is a Laserdisc better than a BluRay? Wouldn't that have sucked if that format took off? LP sized digital discs everywhere.  


Imagine what a Redbox machine would look like. 
rolleyes.gif

 
May 2, 2011 at 10:36 PM Post #85 of 89


Quote:
I've heard a lot of 320kbps mp3 files that sounded horrible, they must have been radio rips or something, I don't even know.
 

 
I've found that mp3 files from albums recorded before 1990 are sometimes recorded from cassette tapes (particularly demo tapes, although that's pretty self explanatory). Buying CD's really is the best (and legal) way to go 
etysmile.gif

 
 
 
May 2, 2011 at 10:39 PM Post #86 of 89


Quote:
 

And I have 60+ in my closet that are deteriorating as we speak.
confused_face.gif

 

 
Ah, gotta love good old laser rot 
evil_smiley.gif
 The only Laserdiscs I've actually seen in person are in my high school physics classroom, and they look like they were probably made in the 1970s
 
Quote:
Imagine what a Redbox machine would look like. 
rolleyes.gif


It would probably be the size of Wal-Mart 
biggrin.gif

 
 
Aug 15, 2019 at 11:20 AM Post #88 of 89
Hi guys. Hope the evening is treating you well & you guys have a little bit of whiskey planned for the evening ahead.

Hope this is the correct place to ask a question of you guys.

I recently installed Foobar 2000 onto my iPhones (iPhone 6S Plus & iPhone 8 Plus - I'm uncertain whether this makes a difference) & loaded quite a lot of new music onto the stock iPhone music application as well as a few FLAC & AIF tracks onto the Foobar 2000 Media Folder on iPhone via iTunes.

Track Listing As Follows:

First Album: HD Tracks Presents: The Sound Of The Future | Format: AIF.

1. Full Moon In Paris (Amber Rubarth)
2. Ain't We Got Fun (Alexis Cole)
3. Wayfaring Stranger (The New Appalachians)
4. Check Point Charlie (Jazz In The New Harmonic)
5. Indian Summer (Kenny Barron & Mark Sherman)

Second Album: Thriller by Michael Jackson | Format: FLAC.

I have listened to these albums using the KZ ZSN Pro & the KZ ZST. As a bit of side information, I have listened to some EDM, Trance & Vocal Trance using the stock iPhone Music App & with the Foobar 2000 App.

I have noticed that the airiness & breathing space of the Foobar 2000 playback is slightly better, more so on the KZ ZSN Pros. The playback of music from the Foobar 2000 App also sounds a little less veiled or subdued, almost a little more dynamic. Is this something that is possible? My apologies for such a long drawn out post. I have tried to provide as much information as possible.

Would there be a difference in the equalisation between the stock iPhone Music App & the Foobar 2000 App? Or perhaps a difference between the way these two applications utilise the the DAC on the device itself? Also, what do you guys think of the DAC's being used by Apple devices in general? Great? Or just good enough?

Any & all comments are welcomed!

Hope I didn't waste your time!

Cheers!

:beers:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top