My esw9 pads just came in from audio Technica..

will compare now..
Good news and bad news (sort of )..
Bad news is Audio Technica chose to update to thinner lambskin area,
Good news is that it IS a leather wich actually preserves the sound qualities like the original.
.edit: I am seeing same newer pads on recent esw9 photos so looks like lambskin phased out.
So on to the comparison.
I was using the ws55 pads wich I considered a noticeable increase in comfort and sound.
I do not remember what qualities of sound but my ears perceived a noticeable improvement over stock pads.
Now onto the new version of the esw9 pads...
At first I did have the bias that they would not be up to par.
And I was really sore and pissed off that there was no more lambskin surface for the ear.
But from memory I knew that the lambskin does not seal a good as these.
So after extensive A/B comparison to the ws55 pads.
There is a distinct difference in the mids.
The mids are more clear, while the slightly larger ws55 pads do not convey this clarity.
What the ws55 pads did do, was give the bass a slightly more pronounced effect.
While the sub bass remained unaffected.
So it looks like the new esw9 pads are actually better than the ws55 pads.
I am now going to test these two pads on the es700,
Which I consider share many similar qualities in upper mids and trebles to the es10. (The es10 Lil brother)
Edit:
Confirmed same results on the es700. .