BigBadWulf
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2014
- Posts
- 59
- Likes
- 15
Thanks. I'm honestly not sure what to take away from this though when considering I'd essentially be paying $999 for a slight alteration. Sub bass makes action movies much more immersive, but midbass is way better for music (IMO). How is the TH-900 sound stage; do they sound as "open" as the ADs? If not, then I'd probably not even consider them and would look more towards the HD800 (although if the 6khz spike is really that bad, maybe not. I couldn't stand the Ultrasone 900s that did something similar). Plus, having "heard" the horrid mids of the Ultrasones, I'll never go back to a V shaped sound again if I can help it. Good mids are very important for vocals or dialogue.
Yesterday I started to play with the HD800, later I switched to the Beyerdynamic DT 990. Well, I will start to make these changes everytime I play, because it really shows the difference. One Point was, that I can`t find a Beyerpeak. The 800 is more aggressive. I get used to the sharpness of the HD800 and that still can be extreme, when you hear very loud music. When you game it is an advantage and absolutely not annoying (except damaging volumes).
If you hear a lot of loud music, the HD800 can be exhausting, but when you game and especially competitive games, it will be the maximum you can get.
I can imagine, that the TH900 Bass will make a game to a great movie, but the 800 will be better in competitive gaming.
Switching to the DT 990 felt like hearing the 800 through a pillow, but the midbass increased a lot and I still could do my job the same way, but with less comfort and much less quality.
Tested with COD BO2 HC SnD with IFI IDSD connected with USB 3.0 without any surround simulation on.
Btw. the HD800 needed less power to reach the same volumes, than the 990 Pro 250 ohms.
Well, the next test will be vs. the Sony MDR MA900 (with T-90 pads). I love that lightweight.