I'd just buy a cable from Monoprice.

Brilliant. I wonder where I can get one in Taiwan. I may pop into the computer market here and look for one...

Also - being in Taiwan - it is very common here to build DIY desktops...rather than buy brand names..
 
So it makes sense to pop this baby into my desktop...for notebook - that would be more of a problem...
 
I will still buy a quality cable for USB anyway ...more than likely the Kimber Kale...

I've owned the Kimber USB cables, and now own a Cardas Clear USB.  The Kimber is very nice and worth every penny.  If you cant hear the difference, (whether you find it an improvement or not is another matter) your deaf as my bronze book ends.  The Cardas is much more neutral and natural, where as the Kimber was warmer and fuzzier. 

Ah....I see - well that was what I was wanting to know more about...

You bet!

This is a good question, one that audiophiles never have an absolute answer to. This is not unlike the Tube vs. Solid State issue which gave birth to the "hybrid" component extolling the "best of both worlds." Some audiophies have even rebuffed these issues as "auto-suggestion." There is a bit of truth to that, but one should beware of at least to constant variables that every other audiophile cannot account for. The first is that hearing varies from person to person and people have different preferences and responses for and to sound. Secondly, every audio component, including cables, has its own sonic signature. You have to know which sonic signature you like and the only way to know that is to experiment and rely on your own ears.
 
To answer your question directly, I happen to have the Kimber usb cable and I would recommend it if you want a warm analog, as opposed to digital, sound. The Kimber doesn't sound digital and I would also characterize it as neutral. My experience with Cardas is with their analog cable which has a warm and dynamic sonic signature, but I would consider it to be neutral. But all of this sounds good to my ear and on my system. I use the Kimber in between my computer and a dac which is connected "optically" to a sample rate converter which is connected to my pre-amp via analog (rca) cables. However, my music is stored on an external hard drive which is connected to the computer with an Audioquest usb cable. The Audioquest is detailed, but it is also bright and lacks the warm and "fullness" of the Kimber. I am considering purchasing the Cardas as an experiment to comapre it to the Kimber and also to determine whether a Kimber/Cardas combination has some sonic benefit. If I find I the Cardas sounds better I will replace the Kimber. I believe the Musicdirect description of the Cardas usb is accurate. It is how I would describe Cardas analog cables.
 
Happy listening

 
Quote:

p a t r i c k said:

I'm not forcing my opinion on anyone.
I'm giving very good advice to anyone that wishes to take it.
The reported differences in these expensive interconnects and USB cables etc is auto-suggestion.
Auto-suggestion is massively powerful in hearing and of course people want to flatter themselves that they are amongst a privileged few who can hear some difference in some silly cable.
Well, they've been conned plain and simple.
If you take apart one of these expensive cables you will see that the manufacturing costs were a fraction of the asking price.
Remember that the manufacturers have absolutely no research and development costs.
The people who claim to be able to hear differences with this cables have not demonstrated this in good blind ABX tests.
I recommend that people spend money on honest manufacturers of sensible well made cables. Not voodoo rubbish.
BTW I have listened to music with a great many types of interconnect in my time. Unlike you (I suspect) I remember well before these ridiculous cables arrived, I was even taken in by them myself when they arrived (about 30 years ago).
It's just auto-suggestion.
Don't waste money on this nonsense.

Click to expand...