Burma Jones
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2009
- Posts
- 203
- Likes
- 17
Quote:
Quote:Quote:Quote:Just another perspective as I had owned SE535 almost 5 months.
Perhaps a flip flop in preference since I did have rave reviews for SE535 but after many months with them...I have sold SE535 and came back to W3 and definitely prefer it and here is why.
Shure clearly capitalizes on the fact that most of the music falls in the midrange frequency and that is fine. But I tend to listen on the loud side (not sure my opinion would change much if I didn't listen loudly) and a forward midrange definitely gets fatiguing on the (my) ears over time. It's the "shouting at you" factor. Granted the SE535 treble is improved over the SE530 but it is often difficult to distinguish it because the midrange literally bleeds into the highs and lows. What it seems like you end up with is an IEM that really plays it safe by giving you 60% of your sound from a benchmark forward midrange and 20% on bass and treble.
After 10 -15 minutes back with W3 I didn't feel the midrange was really recessed. Vocals actually sounded fine. But what I really noticed was a clear and articulate much further extension on top (crispness) and bottom that is just not there with SE535. Or it may be there but it is a little in the background due to so much midrange being presented. I would almost gauge W3 as 35% bass and treble and 30% midrange which (to me) is much more exciting and engaging. Don't get me wrong....SE535 is a fine IEM...very refined and smooth sounding but certainly a personal preference thing of what I describe above. Just my $0.02
I completely agree. I've tried everything (Eq, tips, volume) and I just can't find a happy place with the 535's. I can tame my W3's anytime I want, but I can't add what I feel is missing in the 535. The extension is there with the Shure's, but I find the decay is too short on the bottom end. The W3's are boomtastic, but their decay is spot on. They are as close to a dynamic (IEM/headphone/speaker) as I've heard in a BA. Even the W2, which lacks in extension compared to both the W3 and 535, has a more natural decay than the 535's. If I don't go the custom route, I'll probably pick up another pair of W2's and be done with IEM's.
Hey Joey, I see that you had owned the IE 8. Can you tell me the difference in the bass (quality and quantity) between the IE 8 and the W3? Thanks.
The IE8 is a dynamic IEM, so it literally moves air. That gives it an edge in the thump factor. However, I prefer the bass of the W3. Westone nailed the decay of the W3. It sounds more like a dynamic than a BA. The W3 has great range and impact (you'll swear they are moving air) and they are much more detailed than the IE8. Some people claim that the W3 has a mid-bass hump like the IE8. I disagree. I hear a mid-bass presence (that can easily be EQ'd if you find it overwhelming) that doesn't effect the lower mids like the IE8. While I loved certain aspects of the IE8 (bass thump - soundstage), they lacked detail throughout and couldn't satisfy me with their mids and highs (I heard the veil). The W3 has the best bass I've heard in an IEM.
Hey thanks for your advice Joey. I did auditioned the SE 535 but I prefer the sound signature from my FA DBA-02 and my Null Audio Lune cable TF-10. The SE 535 are excellent universal IEM, but I just find them too genre specific for what I'm looking for. Now that my recabled TF-10 has become very balanced I just want something fun and dynamic to add to my collecton. I've also auditioned the Klipsch X-10i, they are also very good but not in the same caliber as the others. So, in the end it's between the W3 and IE8 because I listen to every genre from baroque classical music to electronica and soundstage is just important as details to me.