Quote:
How about DAC19MkIII PMD100?
anyone compare DAC19-DSP with DAC19MkIII PMD100?
Hi audio-hunter,
I had the dac19mkIII with both the DF1704 and the PMD100 for a few months then I upgraded to the dac19 dsp.
During the time I had the dac19mkIII, I kept going back and forth between the DF1704 and PMD100.
With the PMD100, the sound was warm, soft and "analog" like.
With the DF1704, the sound was fast, dynamic and slighlty on the bright side of neutral.
The PMD100 was very good with 16/44 material and excellent with HDCD material.
The DF1704 was OK with 16/44 material and excellent with 24/96 material (upsampling from 16/44 to 24/96 made an improvement to pure 16/44).
Overall, I found that both filters strengths and weaknesses using the HD650 with a silver cable upgrade. But, none of them was neutral in the sense that both had a different sonic signature. That is why I decided to get the DAC19DSP as it is was suppose to fall right between the 2 in the tonal balance.
Well, I was very surprised by the performance of the dac19dsp: it had a clearer and more resolving sound than the DF1704 dac19mkIII, but was at the same time more natural sounding than the warmer PMD100. If I had to use one word to describe the DSP filter, I would say "realistic" sounding. If you don't need the HDCD capability of the PMD100, I would say to go for the DSP as it is a far superior digital filter than the PMD100/DF1704 which are known to be excellent sounding.
In fact, even if you have a little bit of HDCDs, it is still worth the upgrade. The latest 24/96 I got from HD Tracks are absolutely stunning of realism and beauty. The HDCD were indeed better than most CDs but those 24/96 are even better.
Since you are using the HD650, I would recommend the dac19dsp. If you were using the AKG701/702, the PMD100 could have done a good job. But pairing the PMD100 with the stock HD650, the sound gets too smooth and syrupy and not neutral at all. I hope this helps a little bit.