ericp10
Sits up all night comparing IEMs.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Posts
- 7,465
- Likes
- 1,063
Quote:
Yes I do @ iponderous. It's somewhere in this thread under my first impressions. But briefly, I said some things the Copper does better than the e-Q7, and some things the e-Q7 does better than the Copper making them about equal in enjoyment. For example, Copper treble work with cymbals (and I'm not a treble guy really) and reference-like details blow me away.
On the other hand, the e-Q7 realistic, clear and life-live resolution of bass drums, lower register percussion and strings blow me away.
If I had to choose just one, I would narrowly choose the e-Q7, but I wouldn't want to be put in that postion. I would choose the Copper, however, over the IE8 (and I like the IE8 a lot). I have spent much of the last week and a half with the Copper and the e-Q7 (more Copper). I haven't listened to the IE8 at all during that time period.
| Originally Posted by iponderous /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks ericp10. How do you rate the Copper against the e-Q7 or do you already have a comparative post somewhere around here? |
Yes I do @ iponderous. It's somewhere in this thread under my first impressions. But briefly, I said some things the Copper does better than the e-Q7, and some things the e-Q7 does better than the Copper making them about equal in enjoyment. For example, Copper treble work with cymbals (and I'm not a treble guy really) and reference-like details blow me away.
On the other hand, the e-Q7 realistic, clear and life-live resolution of bass drums, lower register percussion and strings blow me away.
If I had to choose just one, I would narrowly choose the e-Q7, but I wouldn't want to be put in that postion. I would choose the Copper, however, over the IE8 (and I like the IE8 a lot). I have spent much of the last week and a half with the Copper and the e-Q7 (more Copper). I haven't listened to the IE8 at all during that time period.
