Headphony
1000+ Head-Fier
I've been asked about the Mytek Stereo96 DAC a few times by PM, so I'm posting some comments here. There are 3 versions of the DAC: the original with AES and SPDIF in, the 2nd version with 2x SPDIF, AES, and Toslink in, and now a third version that adds USB in and some other new features. (not yet released, AFAIK) I have the 2nd version. I originally bought the Stereo96 DAC for use at work due to the small DVD case-sized footprint and inconspicous appearance. It turned out to be overkill for that application though. Here is a picture next to the Lavry DA10 and Benchmark DAC1 USB:
The features, designed purpose, and overall performance of this DAC is very similar to the Lavry DA10 and Benchmark DAC1. Each is excellent. The Mytek seems to have a slightly forward mid-range in comparison, giving the overall sound an immersive liquid quality. Very detailed and resolving but with a sense of ease and forgivingness compared to the other two DACs. For this reason, I find the Stereo96 DAC to be the best one-box solution of the three. The sound has a visceral and slightly analog quality that a nice sounding separate amp might bring - still very transparent and accurate though.
The trade-off vs the Lavry and Benchmark to my ears is in the sound-stage, which is slightly less well defined, and in the behavior of the treble. Electric guitars don't have quite the same crunch, percussion doesn't have quite the same punch and sizzle, which is not necessarily a bad thing. W5000's and Grado's sound very good straight from the headphone amp. Depending on the source material this is not so much the case with the other 2 DAC's. The Lavry DA10 in comparison sounds slightly more neutral, dry, with better defined soundstage, while the DAC1 sounds unforgivingly analytical - particularly with the W5000's.
I acquired the Stereo96 DAC around the same time as the Rudistor RPX33 amp. Listening to the Stereo96 DAC originally with the Graham Slee "Green" Solo, I was seriously thinking of selling the Lavry DA10 and getting another Mytek to use at home. The relatively dry and neutral sound of the Lavry works very well with the character of the Rudistor amp combined with the W5000's IMO. The overall sound signature of the Mytek reminds me a bit of the Pico dac/amp, due to the slightly forward mid-range, but overall performance, resolution, and satisfaction is significantly better.

The features, designed purpose, and overall performance of this DAC is very similar to the Lavry DA10 and Benchmark DAC1. Each is excellent. The Mytek seems to have a slightly forward mid-range in comparison, giving the overall sound an immersive liquid quality. Very detailed and resolving but with a sense of ease and forgivingness compared to the other two DACs. For this reason, I find the Stereo96 DAC to be the best one-box solution of the three. The sound has a visceral and slightly analog quality that a nice sounding separate amp might bring - still very transparent and accurate though.
The trade-off vs the Lavry and Benchmark to my ears is in the sound-stage, which is slightly less well defined, and in the behavior of the treble. Electric guitars don't have quite the same crunch, percussion doesn't have quite the same punch and sizzle, which is not necessarily a bad thing. W5000's and Grado's sound very good straight from the headphone amp. Depending on the source material this is not so much the case with the other 2 DAC's. The Lavry DA10 in comparison sounds slightly more neutral, dry, with better defined soundstage, while the DAC1 sounds unforgivingly analytical - particularly with the W5000's.
I acquired the Stereo96 DAC around the same time as the Rudistor RPX33 amp. Listening to the Stereo96 DAC originally with the Graham Slee "Green" Solo, I was seriously thinking of selling the Lavry DA10 and getting another Mytek to use at home. The relatively dry and neutral sound of the Lavry works very well with the character of the Rudistor amp combined with the W5000's IMO. The overall sound signature of the Mytek reminds me a bit of the Pico dac/amp, due to the slightly forward mid-range, but overall performance, resolution, and satisfaction is significantly better.