Quote:
Originally Posted by Noumenon /img/forum/go_quote.gif
In your system, you left out the need of a OS which would be another $170, and further you left out the need of a HD TV, which would be $$$ more.
|
Linux, free. Or find a copy of Windows/OSX from an old computer. And what about an HD TV? o.O I just said that it can send an HDMI signal, which the iPad can't. It could use ANY TV as a monitor. Or any PC monitor. Or you can ask a friend to use theirs, set it up once, and just use a remote.
Quote:
Now, you say, "well most people already have a TV, so I didn't add that cost". Yes, you're right, and in fact that was my point to YOU,... "Anyone who would consider [a iPad as music source] in the first place obviously already owns a computer", and yet is still considering it, so there must be circumstances where it would be more convenient and appropriate than a computer, i.e., as an instant on stand alone headphone system, or interfaced into an existing sound system, etc. Your question; "WHY would you want to get away from a computer?", is not relevant to the discussion, as it's based on the presumption that there could be no such possible reason, which is absurd. |
...wat. You make very little sense. I'm saying that there aren't circumstances, as a computer is instant on, and can easily provide better sound, capacity, and reliability.
Quote:
Even using just 32GB, you can still get 100+ of the most listened-to albums in ALAC. Of course you can change albums easily. |
Even if you were able to dedicate all 30gbs of available space to music, it wouldn't hold a varied collection. Also 'changing albums easily' means plugging it into a computer, using the slow and tired iTunes interface, hoping it actually works out how you want it to, and then unplugging it, and plugging it back into your Wadia. Doesn't sound as easy as browsing to another folder on a computer.
Quote:
False. The Wadia 171i uses a CABLE, not a dock.The iPad is ALL ABOUT user interface, that's the entire point of it. |
I have no idea the exact details of the 171i, so excuse me. I went by the looks of the 170i, and the pricing of it plus $20, which is a very conservative guess. Also, the 'iPad' is all about milking more money from iPod fanboys.
Quote:
The iPad as source will not prevent me from using my existing computer. |
Didn't say it would...?
Quote:
True, there is the added cost of a Wadia to get a digital signal to a external DAC/AMP. |
Large added cost, small capacity, interface requiring direct interaction...
Quote:
Yes, it would beat it on cost, but clearly that is not exclusively what motivates most on this Head-Fi forum. In terms of SQ, you still haven't explained HOW your clunky home theater system would "sound better" than a iPad->Wadia 171i->external DAC/AMP setup. |
What should/does motivate the Head-Fi forum is best for your dollar. What does and SHOULDN'T motivate the Head-Fi forum (and apparently yourself) is the product fanboyism. Think past the iPod/Mac.
I don't think anyone has done a direct comparison, but, I'd bet almost anything that the Hiface would outperform the Wadia as a digital transport, especially the BNC version, to the LD-DAC-I's BNC receiver. Competition makes better products, and I don't think the Wadia has much competition in this area.
Also, the HTPC system isn't very clunky at all. If it's plugged into a TV, just use a wireless mouse to access your entire library from your comfy chair.